UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the(RULE 14a-101)
Securities Exchange Act of 1934INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
(AmendmentSCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
¨ | Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ | ||
No fee required. | ||
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of American Greetings Corporation. The meeting will be held at 2:30 p.m., Cleveland, Ohio time on Friday, June 26, 2009,15, 2012, at our World Headquarters, One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144.
The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement describe the items to be considered and acted upon by the shareholders.
If you own shares of record, you will find enclosed a proxy and voting instruction card or cards and an envelope in which to return the card(s). Whether or not you plan to attend this meeting, please sign, date and return your enclosed proxy and voting instruction card(s), or vote over the phone or Internet, as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. You can revoke your proxy before the Annual Meeting and issue a new proxy as you deem appropriate. You will find the procedures to follow if you wish to revoke your proxy on page 2 of the Proxy Statement. Your vote is very important. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Sincerely,
Zev Weiss
Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Time and Date: | 2:30 p.m., Cleveland, Ohio time June | |
Place: | American Greetings Corporation World Headquarters One American Road Cleveland, Ohio 44144 | |
Purpose: | 1. | |
2. | ||
| ||
Who can vote: | You can vote on the proposals above if you are a shareholder of record on | |
Directions: | The World Headquarters campus may be entered from the private road off Memphis Avenue, or from American Road off Tiedeman Road. As you approach from either the private road or American Road, there will be signs directing you to the meeting place. The principal address of American Greetings is One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144. | |
How you can vote: | It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether you plan to attend the meeting. YOU CAN VOTE BY PROXY IN ONE OF THREE WAYS: | |
• By completing and returning your proxy and voting instruction card in the enclosed envelope; or | ||
• By telephone using the toll-free number on your proxy and voting instruction card; or | ||
• Over the Internet, by visiting the Web site noted on your proxy and voting instruction card. |
By order of the Board of Directors,
CATHERINE M. KILBANE
|
Secretary
Dated May 11, 2012
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR SHAREHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 26, 2009: 15, 2012:
Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at
http://investors.americangreetings.com
PROXY STATEMENT
GENERAL INFORMATION
Proxy Solicitation
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of American Greetings Corporation (which is referred to in this Proxy Statement as “American Greetings,” the “company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has ordered solicitation of the accompanying proxy and voting instructions in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Friday, June 26, 2009,15, 2012 at 2:30 p.m., Cleveland time, at our World Headquarters, One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144, to consider and act upon the matters specified in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Copies of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice and proxy and voting instruction card, along with our Annual Report to Shareholders, are first being sent or given to shareholders on or about May 18, 2009.11, 2012.
The expense of soliciting proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling and mailing the Notice, Proxy Statement and proxy and voting instruction card, will be borne by us. Besides solicitation by mail, our officers and other regular employees may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, electronic mail and facsimile. We have asked brokerage houses, banks and other persons holding shares in nominee names to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares held by such nominees, and we will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses.
How to Vote
Registered Holders. If your shares are registered in your name, then you are a “registered holder” and you may vote in person or by proxy. If, after reading the proxy materials, you decide to vote by proxy, you may do so in any ONE of the following three ways:
1. By telephone. With your proxy and voting instruction card in front of you, you may call the toll-free number1-800-690-6903and follow the simple instructions.
2. Over the Internet. With your proxy and voting instruction card in front of you, you may use a computer to access the Web site www.proxyvote.com where you can follow the simple instructions that will be given to you to record your vote.
3. By mail. You may mark, sign and date your proxy and voting instruction card and return it in the enclosed prepaid and addressed envelope. You do not need to mail the proxy and voting instruction card if you have voted by telephone or over the Internet.
The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast and allow shareholders to appoint a proxy and to confirm that their actions have been properly recorded. Specific voting instructions are set forth on the accompanying proxy and voting instruction card.
- 1 -
Participants in the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. One of the investment alternatives in the American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan is a fund consisting of our Class A common shares. Participants investing in the American Greetings stock fund are allocated units that represent an interest in such shares. If you invest in the American Greetings stock fund of the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, the plan’s independent trustee, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, will vote the Class A common shares allocated to your account according to your directions. Participants may give voting directions to the plan trustee in any ONE of the three ways set forth above under “Registered Holders.” The trustee will vote shares for which it has not received instructions in accordance with instructions that it receives from us. We will direct the trustee based on the direction of the plan’s administrative committee, which is a committee consisting of our employees.
Nominee Shares. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” through a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee that holds the shares on your behalf, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by obtaining a legal proxy from the nominee that holds your shares. In addition to voting in person, you may vote by proxy by completing and signing the voting instruction card provided to you by the nominee that holds your shares, or by voting via the Internet or by telephone as permitted by the nominee that holds your shares. As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted, youmust provide voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from them. Because the election of directors at the Annual Meeting is considered a non-routine matter under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), brokers, banks or other nomineesmay not vote on this matter unless they have received specific voting instructions from beneficial owners. Such shares that brokers do not have the authority to vote in the absence of timely instructions from the beneficial owners result in what is commonly referred to as “broker non-votes.”
Changing or Revoking Your Proxy
You have the right to change or revoke your proxy prior to the closing of the polls as indicated on your proxy and voting instruction card and may do so in any one of the following four ways:
1. send a written notice to the American Greetings’ Secretary stating that you want to change your proxy vote;
2. submit a properly signed proxy and voting instruction card with a later date;
3. enter later-dated telephone or Internet voting instructions; or
4. vote in person at the Annual Meeting.NOTE: Because your Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan shares are held in a qualified plan, you are not able to vote the shares allocated to your account in the plan in person at the Annual Meeting.
Your presence at the Annual Meeting, without more, will not revoke your proxy. However, you may revoke your proxy in the manner described above at any time before it has been exercised.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please check the attendance box on the enclosed proxy and voting instruction card or indicate so when prompted if you are voting by telephone or over the Internet.
If you are a beneficial shareholder only, that is if your shares are not registered in your name but are held by a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee, you will have to check with your broker, trustee, bank or other nominee to determine how to change your vote. Also note that if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will not be able to vote in person at the meeting any of your shares held by a nominee unless you have a valid proxy from the nominee.
Cumulative Voting
If cumulative voting is invoked as described below, a shareholder may cumulate votes for the election of a director nominee by casting a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of votes to which the shareholder is entitled. The shareholder also may distribute his or her votes between or among two or more nominees on the same basis.
- 2 -
Shareholders have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors ifif:
(i) any shareholder gives notice in writing to the President, a Vice President or the Secretary of American Greetings, not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for the holding of the Annual Meeting, that he or she desires that the voting at such Annual Meeting be cumulative, and
(ii) an announcement that a shareholder has given American Greetings notice of cumulative voting is made upon the convening of the Annual Meeting by the Chairman of the Board or the Secretary or by or on behalf of the shareholder giving such notice.
2
Unless otherwise indicated by the shareholder, where cumulative voting is invoked, the persons named in the accompanying proxy and voting instruction card will vote, in their discretion, for one or more of the nominees for whom authority to so vote was not withheld and will cumulate votes so as to elect the maximum number of nominees proposed by the Board.
If cumulative voting is not invoked at the Annual Meeting with respect to the election of directors, the proxies will vote the number of shares on the proxy and voting instruction card for only those Board nominees for whom authority has not been withheld.
How Shares Will Be Voted
The shares represented by your proxy will be voted in accordance with your instructions indicated on the proxy and voting instruction card or with the instructions you provided by telephone or over the Internet. If you return an executed proxy and voting instruction card without any such instructions, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’Board’s recommendations.
Required Vote
The presence at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of not less than 25% of the total voting power of American Greetings on the record date will represent a quorum, permitting the conduct of business at the meeting. If a quorum is present at the meeting, the
The nominees for election as directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast for the election of directors at the meeting by the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be elected directors. Abstentions with respect toIf you withhold your vote from one or more of the nominees, the vote will be treated as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, butquorum; however, broker non-votes with respect to one or more nominees will not be treated as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Neither withhold from voting votes nor broker non-votes will be counted as votes cast with respect to the election of one or more directors and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Similarly, shares that brokers do not have the authority to vote in the absence of timely instructions from the beneficial owners (commonly referred to as “broker non-votes”), if any, will be treated as present for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast and, accordingly, will not affect the outcome of the vote in the election of directors.
Approval of Proposal Two requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting and requires that the total vote cast on Proposal Two represent over 50% in interest of all securities entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal Two. If the Amendment to the American Greetings Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan is not approved by our shareholders, it will not become effective. However, the Board reserves the right, subject to all applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange listing standards, to adopt such other compensation plans and programs as it deems appropriate and in the best interests of American Greetings and its shareholders.
Voting Securities and Record Date
As of May 1, 2009,April 30, 2012, there were outstanding, excluding treasury shares which cannot be voted, 35,919,77232,256,484 Class A common shares entitled to one vote per share and 3,497,2102,842,748 Class B common shares entitled to ten votes per share upon all matters presented to the shareholders.
- 3 -
Holders of record of such shares at the close of business on May 1, 2009,April 30, 2012 are the only shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.
Shares Included on the Proxy and Voting Instruction Card
If you are both a registered shareholder of American Greetings and hold shares through the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, you may have received one proxy and voting instruction card that shows all American Greetings common shares registered in your name, including all shares you have (based on the units credited to your account) under the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Accordingly, your proxy and voting instruction card also serves as your voting directions to the independent trustee of the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan.
Please note, however, that unless the identical name or names appeared on all your accounts, we were not able to consolidate your share information. If that was the case, you received more than one proxy and voting instruction card and must vote each separately.
If your shares are held through a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee, you will receive either a voting form or a proxy card from the nominee with specific instructions about the voting methods available to you. As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted, youmust provide voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from them. Under the rules of the NYSE, your broker cannot vote your shares on the election of directors if you do not timely provide instructions for voting your shares.
3
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Shareholders elect the Boardmembers of Directorsthe Board to oversee their interestinterests in the long-term health, and the overall success and the financial strength of our business. The Board serves as our ultimate decision-making body, except for those matters reserved to or shared with the shareholders. The Board selects and oversees the members of senior management who are charged by the Board with conducting our business.
The Board follows, both formally and informally, corporate governance principles designed to assure that, through its membership, composition, and committee structure, the Board is able to provide us informed, competent and independent oversight. The Board has reviewedreviews and, as appropriate, from time to time revises our corporate governance policies and committee charters to assure that the Board continues to meet fully its responsibilities to our shareholders. Below is a description of the measures in place to assure that objective is achieved.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines, which may be found in the investors section of our Web site atwww.corporate.americangreetings.com and will be made available in print upon request by any shareholder to our Secretary. www.corporate.americangreetings.com. These corporate governance guidelines are intended to assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities and to serve best the interests of the company and its shareholders. The guidelines aim to assure that director qualifications, committee structure and overall Boardboard processes provide good corporate governance and independent oversight of management.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics to govern our directors, executive officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer. A current copy of the code is available on the investors section of our Web site atwww.corporate.americangreetings.com and will be made available in print upon request by any shareholder to our Secretary. www.corporate.americangreetings.com. We will disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of the code of business conduct and ethics for executive officers and directors on our Web site.
Independent Directors
The New York Stock ExchangeNYSE rules require listed companies to have a Boardboard of Directorsdirectors with at least a majority of independent directors. Under the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE rules, a director qualifies as “independent” upon the Board’s affirmative determination that the director has no material relationship with
- 4 -
American Greetings (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with American Greetings). In assessing the materiality of a relationship, the Board has not adopted categorical standards beyond the New York Stock Exchange criteria, but rather broadly considers all relevant facts and circumstances. In addition to the independence standards established by the NYSE, we have adopted additional criteria for determining whether our directors, including the directors serving on each of our Audit Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee (which we also refer to herein as the “Compensation Committee”) and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (which we also refer to herein as the “Nominating Committee”) are independent. These additional criteria are set forth in our corporate governance guidelines, which may be found in the investors section of our Web site at www.corporate.americangreetings.com. Under our corporate governance guidelines, at least two-thirds of our directors must also satisfy these additional independence criteria. The Board of Directors has determined that Drs. Cowen and Thornton and Messrs. Dunn, Hardin, MacDonald, Merriman and Ratner are independent under the New York Stock Exchange standards. Mr. Stephen Hardis, whose term as director expired on June 27, 2008, was also considered by the Board of Directors to be independentNYSE rules and under the New York Stock Exchange standards.
additional standards described in our corporate governance guidelines. In the course of the Board’s determination regarding the independence of each non-management director, the Board considered the following transactions, relationships and arrangements in determining that the director is independent:
1. Dr. Cowen is a director of, and Mr. Ratner is chairman of the board, a greater than 10% shareholder and the former president and chief executive officer of, Forest City Enterprises. A subsidiary of Forest City Enterprises rents retail store space in various shopping malls to us pursuant to lease agreements in the ordinary course of business. We sold our retail store operations to Schurman Fine Papers in April 2009, and since the time of the sale, we have subleased or assigned the retail store locations to Schurman Fine Papers. In addition, Mr. Ratner has a 10% indirect ownership interest, through a trust, in a Cleveland,
4 Ohio shopping mall that leased space to us for one retail store that is now under sublease to Schurman Fine Papers. During fiscal 2010, 2011 and a portion of fiscal 2012, that shopping mall was managed by RMS Investment Corporation (“RMS”). Each of Mr. Ratner’s four children has a 4.28% ownership interest in RMS. 2. Dr. Thornton is a member of the board of directors of Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., a company from which we purchase products and services from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Until February 2012, Mr. Dunn was the Chief Executive Officer and owner of 5% of the common equity of HIT Entertainment Limited, a company from which we license certain character properties in the ordinary course of business. 3. We made discretionary charitable contributions to charitable and other non-profit organizations where each of Messrs. MacDonald, Merriman and Ratner and Drs. Cowen and Thornton serves or has served as an executive officer, director or trustee. 4. Under the charitable matching contribution program that we established in fiscal 2012, in a given fiscal year, we will match up to $10,000 of contributions made by an independent director to a charitable or other non-profit organization. Under this program, we made matching contributions of $10,000 to charitable or non-profit organizations on behalf of Mr. Merriman and Drs. Cowen and Thornton in fiscal 2012. |
|
All of the transactions, relationships or arrangements listed above were entered into, and payments were made or received by us, in the ordinary course of business and on competitive terms. Aggregate payments that were made to, or that we received from, each of the relevant organizations, including any charitable organizations,organization in which a non-management director served as an executive officer, did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues for each of the most recent three completed fiscal years. Accordingly,years and did not directly result in a change in the compensation received by the director from that organization. The Board has determined that these transactions, relationships and arrangements are not material, do not create a material relationship between American Greetings and any of Messrs. Dunn, Hardin, Hardis, MacDonald, Merriman and Ratner or Drs. Cowen or Thornton and that the independent judgment of these directors has not been and will not be compromised by such transactions, relationships and arrangements.
- 5 -
In addition, based on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE independence standards, the Board determined that (1) Messrs. Zev, Jeffrey and Morry Weiss are not independent because they are executive officers of American Greetings,Greetings.
Board Leadership Structure
We separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and (2)Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. As Chief Executive Officer, Zev Weiss is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the company.
As the Chairman of the Board, Morry Weiss provides guidance in such critical functions as mergers and acquisitions and other strategic initiatives, works with the Chief Executive Officer in developing the company’s long-range strategic plans, provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management and presides over meetings of the full Board. In addition, the duties and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board include the following:
determining an appropriate schedule of Board meetings seeking to ensure that the independent directors can perform their duties responsibly while not interfering with the flow of the company’s operations;
seeking input from all directors as to the preparation of the agendas for Board meetings, preparing agendas for Board meetings, and providing input, as appropriate, to the committee chairs regarding agenda items for committee meetings;
assessing the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from our management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties, advise management as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties;
5
directing, in consultation with the independent directors, the retention of consultants who report directly to the Board;
ensuring that the Nominating Committee oversees compliance with and implementation of our corporate governance policies and ensuring that the chairperson of the Nominating Committee oversees the process to recommend revisions to our corporate governance policies;
ensuring that the Compensation Committee oversees compliance with and implementation of our policies and procedures for evaluating and undertaking executive and incentive-based compensation, including stock options;
requiring at least three executive sessions of the Board’s independent directors per year;
recommending the membership of the various Board committees and ensuring that the independent directors select committee chairs for the Audit and Compensation Committees; and
providing the independent directors the authority to retain counsel or consultants as the independent directors deem necessary to perform their responsibilities as committee members.
Because Mr. MerrimanMorry Weiss, our Chairman, is not independent, because heour Board has servedappointed Mr. Ratner to be the “presiding director” at the executive sessions of the “non-management” directors, as defined under the rules of the NYSE. The Board believes that this structure provides an effective leadership model for the company.
In addition, to further enhance its governance, during fiscal 2013, the Board expects to appoint one of its independent directors as a “Lead Independent Director.” The Lead Independent Director will be designated annually by the independent directors of the Board. The Lead Independent Director will be responsible for coordinating the activities of the independent directors of the Board as follows:
assisting in the determination of an appropriate schedule of Board meetings to help ensure that independent directors of the Board can attend meetings and perform their duties responsibly;
seeking input from all directors of the Board as to the preparation of agendas for Board and committee meetings;
advising the Board as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from our management that is necessary for the independent directors of the Board to effectively and responsibly perform their duties;
coordinating, developing the agenda for, and moderating executive officersessions of American Greetings within the past three years.Board’s independent directors when necessary, and, when necessary, act as a liaison between the independent directors of the Board and the Chairman of the Board and/or Chief Executive Officer on sensitive issues; and
retaining such counsel or consultants as the Lead Independent Director deems necessary to perform his or her responsibilities.
Board Oversight of Risk
The Board, as a whole and also at the committee level, is responsible for oversight of risks that could affect the company. The Board, committees or both receive regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the company, including sales, operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic risks. The Audit Committee oversees the company’s enterprise risk assessment and risk management policies. In addition, the Compensation Committee evaluates risks associated with the company’s compensation policies and practices and discusses these risks with the Audit Committee. The Board focuses on the most significant risks facing the company and the company’s processes to enable the organization to identify, manage and mitigate risks. Although the Board oversees the company’s risk management, company management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. The company does not believe that the Board’s role in the oversight of risk has an effect on the Board’s leadership structure.
6
Board of Directors and Committees
Mr. Joseph S. Hardin, Jr., whose term as director will expire at the Annual Meeting, will not be standing for re-election to the Board. Mr. Hardin has served on the Board with distinction since 2004 and we will miss his wise counsel in helping direct our growth and wish him well in the future.
The Board met eightfour times during fiscal 2009.2012. The Board has a standing Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation and Management Development Committee (which we also refer to herein as the “Compensation Committee”).Committee. Each member of the Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation and Management Development Committees is independent as defined under the current listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.NYSE and under the additional standards adopted by the Board, as outlined in the company’s corporate governance guidelines.
Executive Committee
Morry Weiss | ||
William E. MacDonald, III | Jerry Sue Thornton | |
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | Jeffrey Weiss | |
Charles A. Ratner | ||
Zev Weiss |
The Executive Committee has the same power and authority as the Board between meetings of the Board except that it may not fill vacancies on the Board or on committees of the Board. The Executive Committee held no meetingsone meeting during fiscal 2009.2012.
Audit Committee
William E. MacDonald, III | Jeffrey D. Dunn | |
Scott S. Cowen | Michael J. Merriman, Jr. |
The Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member is financially literate under the current listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.NYSE. The Board also determined that each of Mr. MacDonald and Mr. Merriman qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. Shareholders should understand that the designation of each of Mr. MacDonald and Mr. Merriman as an “audit committee financial expert” is an SEC disclosure requirement and that it does not impose upon them any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than those generally imposed on them as members of the Audit Committee and the Board. In addition, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE rules mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, members of the Audit Committee must have no affiliation with the issuer, other than their board seats, and receive no compensation in any capacity other than as a director or committee member. Each member of the Audit Committee meets this additional independence standard applicable to Audit Committee members of New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listed companies.
The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by: (1) monitoring the integrity of our financial statements; (2) monitoring the integrity of our auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally; (3) monitoring the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit department; (4) monitoring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (5) reviewing the adequacy of and compliance with our financial policies and procedures and systems of internal control; (6) preparing the Audit Committee Report to be included in this Proxy Statement; and (7) making regular reports to the Board and keeping written minutes of its meetings. The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying transactions with related persons, as described below in the “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” section of this Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee has the sole authority to engage and replace the independent registered public accounting firm.
- 6 -
The Audit Committee met fivenine times during fiscal 2009. A2012. The current copyversion of the Audit Committee charter is available onin the investors section of our Web site atwww.corporate.americangreetings.com and will be made available in print upon request by any shareholder to our Secretary. www.corporate.americangreetings.com.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Charles A. Ratner | Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | |
William E. MacDonald, III | Jerry Sue Thornton |
The purposes of the Nominating and Governance Committee are to (1) assist the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and to recommend to the Board the director nominees for each annual meeting of
7
shareholders; (2) review and recommend to the Board qualifications for committee membership and committee structure and operations; (3) recommend to the Board directors to serve on each committee and a chairpersonchair for each such committee; (4) develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance policies and procedures; and (5) lead the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance. The Nominating and Governance Committee met threetwo times during fiscal 2009.2012. A current copyversion of the Nominating and Governance Committee charter is available onin the investors section of our Web site atwww.corporate.americangreetings.com and will be made available in print upon request by any shareholder to our Secretary. www.corporate.americangreetings.com.
It is the policy of the Nominating and Governance Committee to consider individuals recommended by shareholders for membership on the Board. If a shareholder desires to recommend an individual for membership on the Board, then that shareholder must provide a written notice on or before January 1911, 2013 to our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or Secretary at American Greetings Corporation, One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144, for consideration by the Nominating Committee for that year’s election of directors at the Annual Meeting. It is the policy of the Committee not to evaluate candidates recommended by shareholders any differently from candidates recommended from other sources.
The Nominating and Governance Committee determines, and reviews with the Board on an annual basis, the desired skills and characteristics for directors as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment considers the nominee’s qualification as independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange,NYSE, as well as diversity, age, skill and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. When the Nominating Committee considers diversity, it views diversity in the broadest sense, including a person’s age, gender, race, national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. The Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board and the Nominating Committee believe that it is essential that the Board members represent diverse viewpoints and skills, which contribute to a more effective decision-making process. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating Committee considers the entirety of Directors.each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards. The Nominating Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective director nominees. American Greetings believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions.
The biography of each current and nominated director set forth below in Proposal One contains information regarding the person’s service as a director of our company, director positions at publicly-held companies held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating Committee and the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for American Greetings.
The Nominating Committee will recommend prospective Board members who have the highest personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and who the Nominating Committee believes will be effective, in conjunction with the other members of the Board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the shareholders. When seeking candidates for the Board, the Nominating Committee may consider candidates proposed by our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or shareholders and may also solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management and third-party search firms, although the Board has not engaged a third-party search firm at this time.
Compensation and Management Development Committee
Scott S. Cowen | Charles A. Ratner | |
Jeffrey D. Dunn | Jerry Sue Thornton |
The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board reviews and approves the compensation for our executive officers generally and reviews and approves our executive and employee compensation plans (including the plans for our executive officers, including our named executive officers identified in the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table in the “Information“Fiscal 2012 Information Concerning Executive Officers” section below and our other executive officers)below); reviews and approves grants and awards to executive officers and other participants under our equity-based compensation
8
plans; and oversees the annual evaluation of management. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for producing the Report of the Compensation and Management Development Committee included in this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee met sixseven times during fiscal 2009. A2012. The current copyversion of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the investors section of our Web site atwww.corporate.americangreetings.com and will be made available in print upon request by any shareholder to our Secretary. www.corporate.americangreetings.com.
Use of Consultants
- 7 -
From time to time, the Compensation Committee uses outside compensation consultants to work with the Compensation Committee and management. During fiscal 2009,The Compensation Committee has engaged Mercer Human Resource Consulting,(US) Inc. (“Mercer”), a global human resources consulting firm, was engagedwholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”), to provideassist it in setting executive and non-employee director compensation levels, designing and implementing incentive plans for executives and non-employee directors, and providing industry data and peer group pay practices to assist management in making recommendations regarding the compensation of our executive officers and non-employee directors. Prior to engaging Mercer, we had engaged Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. (“Towers Perrin”) as our global human resources consulting firm and theThe industry data and recommendations previously provided by Towers PerrinMercer were used as one of the resources in making compensation decisions during fiscal 2009.2012. Mercer’s fees for executive compensation consulting to the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2012 were $171,877. The use of an independent consultant provides additional assurance that our executive compensation programs are reasonable and consistent with company objectives. Although management, particularly the Senior Vice President of Human Resources, works closely with Mercer, the consultant is ultimately accountable to the Compensation Committee on engagements relating to the compensation of our executive officers and our outside directors. During fiscal 2009,2012, Mercer periodically participated in Compensation Committee meetings and advised the Compensation Committee with respect to to:
compensation trends and best practices;
changes to the peer group that we use for compensation purposes;
plan design;
compensation practices plan design,in our peer group as well as in the overall marketplace; and
the reasonableness of individual compensation awards. From time to time Mercer and Towers Perrin have assisted management in evaluating the broad based compensation programs that we provide to all of our employees, specifically with respect to compensation trends, best practices and plan design.
Additional information on the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation is included in the “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis section below, and for consideration of non-employee director compensation is included in the “Director Compensation” section below.
American Greetings and its subsidiaries also separately retain Mercer and other affiliates of MMC to provide services and products that are unrelated to the services provided to the Compensation Committee on matters relating to the compensation of our executive officers and non-employee directors (the “Unrelated Company Services”). In fiscal 2012, the Unrelated Company Services included such products and services as: insurance coverage, including officer and director insurance, group life insurance, workers compensation insurance and salary continuance insurance; motor vehicle, marine transit, and corporate travel insurance; advisory and administrative services with respect to employee pension plans; and general purpose compensation surveys. During fiscal 2012, we paid Mercer or other affiliates of MMC an aggregate of $153,291 for these Unrelated Company Services, which amount does not include fees passed on by the affiliates of MMC to unrelated third parties for payment of insurance premiums on policies for which the MMC affiliate only provided brokerage or other advisory services. The decisions to engage Mercer or other affiliates of MMC for Unrelated Company Services in fiscal 2012 were made by employees of the company or its subsidiaries. However, the Compensation Committee follows a policy requiring that management receive the Compensation Committee’s prior approval to engage a compensation consultant or an affiliate thereof to provide non-executive compensation services to the extent such engagement, individually or in the aggregate, involves the payment of fees to such consultant or affiliate in excess of $50,000. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee approved in advance the engagement of Mercer and other affiliates of MMC to provide the Unrelated Company Services during fiscal 2012.
9
Mercer has advised us that none of its principals or employees who provided advice to the Compensation Committee had any direct or indirect involvement in providing the Unrelated Company Services, or in the company’s selection of, or negotiation of arrangements with, Mercer or other affiliates of MMC to provide such services. In addition, none of Mercer’s principals or employees who provided advice to the Compensation Committee received any direct or indirect compensation as a result of Unrelated Company Services, other than to the extent that employees of Mercer benefit from the overall success of MMC and its affiliates generally. The Compensation Committee does not believe that Mercer’s ability to provide it with objective advice was impaired by the Unrelated Company Services provided to the company and its affiliates.
In addition, American Greetings has practices and procedures for ensuring the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant is independent and for minimizing potential conflicts of interest including the following:
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and dismiss Mercer at any time;
Mercer reports directly to the Compensation Committee and has direct access to the Committee through the Committee chair;
Each engagement of Mercer by the Compensation Committee is documented in an engagement letter that includes a description of the agreed upon services, fees and other matters considered appropriate; and
As described above, management must receive the Compensation Committee’s prior approval to engage a compensation consultant or an affiliate thereof to provide Unrelated Company Services to the extent such engagement, individually or in the aggregate, involves the payment of fees to such consultant or affiliate in excess of $50,000.
Attendance
During fiscal 2009,2012, each incumbent director attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the respective committees on which he or she serves, except for Mr. Dunn and Mr. Hardin, who were absent due to unusual circumstances.serves. We have established a formal policy requiring director attendance at all Board meetings (and committee meetings of committees of which the director is a member), absent unusual circumstances. We expect our directors to attend the annual meetings of shareholders (which are usually held the same day as a meeting of the Board). Each director attended the 20082011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, except for Mr. DunnMessrs. Morry Weiss, Merriman and Ratner, who waswere unable to attend.
Communications to the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors believes that it is important for shareholders and other interested parties to have a process to send communications to the Board. Accordingly, shareholders and interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board, of Directors, an individual director, the presiding director of non-management director executive sessions, or the non-management or independent directors as a group can mail a letter to the Board, of Directors, individual director, presiding director, or group of non-management directors (as applicable) c/o Secretary, American Greetings Corporation, One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Board Communication” or “Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author and clearly state the intended recipients. The Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulate them to the appropriate director or directors; however, the Secretary will not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or if it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic. The individual directors are not spokespeople for American Greetings and people should not expect a response or a reply to any communication.
Executive Sessions
In accordance with New York Stock ExchangeNYSE rules, non-management directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. Mr. Ratner has been appointed as the presiding director by the non-management directors to preside at these sessions.
- 8 -
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Code of Regulations, the Board is comprised of Directors comprises three classes of directors, each class consisting of not less than three directors and having a three-year term. In accordance with our Amended and Restated Code of Regulations, the Board of Directors has fixed the board size at nine (9) members, with each Class having three (3) directors, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting.directors. Class II members are to be elected at the June 26, 2009 Annual Meeting.
It is proposed that the shareholders re-elect the following nominees for Class II directors: Charles A. Ratner, Jerry Sue Thornton and Jeffrey Weiss. In addition, due to the fact that Mr. Hardin is not standing for re-election to the Board, to ensure that each Class of directors consists of at least three members, it is proposed that Mr. Charles A. Ratner, who is currently a Class III director with a term expiring in 2010, be nominated as a Class II director. If he is elected as a Class II director by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, he will simultaneously resign as a Class III director, leaving three directors in each Class. The term of office to be served by each nominee in Class II, if elected, will be three years, until the 20122015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Each of these nominees for Class II director has agreed to stand for election.re-election.
If for any reason any of the nominees is not a candidate when the election occurs (which is not expected), the Board of Directors expects that proxies will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee designated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; provided, however, proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.
Vote Required
The nominees who receive the greatest number of votes cast for the election of directors at the Annual Meeting by the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be elected directors.
The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” all of the following nominees.
The biography of each of the nominees and continuing directors below contains information regarding the individual’s service as a director for American Greetings, business experience, and director positions at other publicly-traded companies that the individual holds currently or has held at any time during the last five years. In addition, the experiences, qualifications and attributes or skills that caused the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for the company are also included.
Nominees for Election to Term Expiring in 2012Ending 2015
(Class II)
Charles A. Ratner
Director (2000),
Mr. |
- 9 -
The Board chose to nominate Mr. Ratner as a director because of his extensive executive management experience, with a particular emphasis in real estate development, along with particular strengths with respect to leadership, management and corporate governance skills gained from more than 40 years of senior management experience at Forest City Enterprises, Inc. as well as his experience on other boards of directors. In addition, Mr. Ratner has acquired a deep understanding of our products and our company during his more than ten years of service on our board and provides the board a valuable perspective as a member of the boards of several prominent local non-profit organizations. | ||
| Jerry Sue Thornton
Director (2000), member of the
Dr. Thornton is the President of Cuyahoga Community College, Cleveland, Ohio | |
The Board chose to nominate Dr. Thornton as a director because of her extensive management experience and her experience serving on boards of directors of public companies. In addition, as the president of Cuyahoga Community College, Dr. Thornton has demonstrated management expertise and is a recognized leader in the local community, which, among other things, provides the board a valuable perspective on engagement with the public sector and the communities in which we operate. Dr. Thornton also provides the Board a valuable perspective as a member of the boards of several local non-profit organizations. | ||
| Jeffrey Weiss
Director (2003), member of the Executive Committee
Mr. Weiss is President and Chief Operating Officer of American Greetings, a position he has held since |
The Board chose to nominate Mr. Weiss as a director because of his extensive executive management and leadership skills, together with his significant knowledge of the social expressions industry, gained through his 20-plus years of experience at the company. In addition, as our President and Chief Operating Officer, his day-to-day exposure to the company’s activities provides Mr. Weiss with an exhaustive understanding of our operations and an in-depth knowledge of our corporate strategies.
- 10 -
12
Continuing Directors with Term Expiring in 20102013
(Class III)
Scott S. Cowen
Director (1989),
Dr. Cowen is President and Seymour S Goodman Professor of Management and Professor of Economics, Tulane University, a position he has held since 1998. Prior to that, Dr. Cowen served as Dean and Albert J. Weatherhead, III Professor of Management, Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Cowen | ||
The Board selected Dr. Cowen because of his breadth of knowledge in economics, finance and management, extensive experience in the public sector and his cumulative service on boards of directors in industries that are relevant to our operations. As the president of Tulane University, a national research university, Dr. Cowen also brings valuable management and leadership experience. In addition to the leadership skills he possesses as a result of his work at Tulane University, Dr. Cowen has gained extensive crisis management experience from his leadership in the rebuilding of Tulane following its devastation by Hurricane Katrina. He also played a leadership role in the rebuilding of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, and in major New Orleans civic and business organizations, including chairing the Southeast Louisiana Regional Airport Authority and a committee charged with reforming and rebuilding the New Orleans public schools following Hurricane Katrina. |
| William E. MacDonald, III
Director (2007),
Mr. MacDonald was Vice Chairman and member of the Office of the Chairman of National City Corporation |
13
The Board selected Mr. MacDonald because of his valuable experience and insights into banking and capital markets gained during his thirty-eight year career in increasingly significant management positions with National City Corporation. Mr. MacDonald’s experience in leading a large corporate organization, structuring complex financial solutions, and his expertise in economic issues provide the Board with valuable expertise and qualifies him as a “financial expert” on the Board’s Audit Committee, as described above under the section “Audit Committee.” In addition, Mr. MacDonald’s service as a director on boards of other public companies has enhanced his understanding in areas of executive management, corporate governance, strategic planning and executive compensation, which has made him a valuable resource to the company. Mr. MacDonald also brings a valuable perspective as a member of the boards of several prominent local non-profit organizations.
| Zev Weiss
Director (2003), member of the Executive Committee
Mr. Weiss became Chief Executive Officer of American Greetings in | |
The Board selected Mr. Weiss because of his extensive executive management and leadership skills gained through his 18 years of experience at the company. Mr. Weiss has extensive knowledge of the social expressions industry in general and the company’s business in particular and, as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Weiss’s day-to-day leadership of American Greetings gives him critical insights into our operations and strategies, and provides an important link between management and our Board, facilitating the Board’s ability to effectively perform its oversight function with the benefit of management’s perspective on the business. |
As noted above, Mr. Charles A. Ratner, who is currently a Class III director, has been nominated as a Class II director. If Mr. Ratner is elected as a Class II director by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, he will simultaneously resign as a Class III director.
- 11 -
Continuing Directors with Term Expiring in 20112014
(Class I)
| Jeffrey D. Dunn
Director (2007), member of the Audit Committee and
Mr. Dunn | |
The Board selected Mr. Dunn as a director because of his expertise in the areas of children’s entertainment, intellectual property, digital content and licensing as well as his international business experience. In addition, during his career, among other significant achievements, Mr. Dunn implemented business strategies for the successful development of worldwide children’s entertainment brands and other intellectual property rights, which has provided the Board a valuable resource on a variety of matters, including the marketing, development and merchandising of the company’s entertainment properties, such as Care Bears and Strawberry Shortcake. | ||
| Michael J. Merriman, Jr.
Director (2006), member of the Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Executive Committee
Mr. Merriman has been an operating advisor with Resilience Capital Partners, LLC (a private equity firm) since |
- 12 -The Board selected Mr. Merriman as a director because of his financial acumen, his significant public accounting experience, his service on boards of directors of other publicly-traded companies and his product development expertise. Mr. Merriman has significant finance, financial reporting and accounting expertise and was formerly a
15
certified public accountant, which provides the Board with valuable expertise and qualifies him as a “financial expert” on the Audit Committee, as described above under the section “Audit Committee.” In addition, because of his wide range of management experience, including as a former partner at Arthur Andersen & Co. and his service as chief financial officer of American Greetings, Mr. Merriman provides valuable insight into the company’s operations as well as its interactions with investors and financial analysts.
Morry Weiss
Director (1971), Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Mr. | ||
The Board selected Mr. Weiss as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors because of his 50 years of extensive experience in the social expressions industry, holding positions of ever-increasing executive responsibility at the company, including accomplished roles as American Greetings’ President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer. As a member of our company’s founding family and member of senior management for over 30 years, Mr. Weiss has extensive knowledge of our industry as well as our business and history that provides the Board valuable insight into our operations and strategies. In addition, Mr. Weiss has served on various boards of directors of other companies and organizations, providing the Board with an array of valuable perspectives and insights. |
- 13 -
PROPOSAL TWO
APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION
2007 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
At the annual meeting held on June 22, 2007, the shareholders of American Greetings adopted the American Greetings Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) pursuant to which 2,800,000 Class A common shares and 700,000 Class B common shares were reserved for issuance to key employees, non-employee directors and consultants of American Greetings and its subsidiaries. On April 17, 2009, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors adopted, subject to shareholder approval, an amendment to the Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan by an additional 1,600,000 Class A common shares and 400,000 Class B common shares (the “Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan”). The Board of Directors has directed that the proposal to approve the Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan be submitted to our shareholders for their approval at the Annual Meeting.
The reason for this increase is to ensure that sufficient shares of American Greetings Class A and Class B common shares are available under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to attract, retain and motivate top quality management, employees, officers and non-employee directors. As of May 4, 2009, there were 712,850 Class A common shares and 81,072 Class B common shares remaining for future awards, which would increase to 2,312,850 Class A common shares and 481,072 Class B common shares if the Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan is approved.
The Board of Directors believes that the Omnibus Incentive Plan is an integral part of our compensation philosophy and programs. Our ability to attract, retain and motivate top quality management, employees, officers and non-employee directors is material to our success, and the Board of Directors has concluded that our expanded ability to achieve these objectives has been enhanced by the ability to make grants under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. In addition, the Board of Directors believes that the interests of American Greetings and its shareholders will be advanced by continuing to offer our employees, officers and non-employee directors the opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interests in American Greetings.
The material terms of the Omnibus Incentive Plan are summarized below. This summary of the Omnibus Incentive Plan is not intended to be a complete description of the Omnibus Incentive Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended, attached as Exhibit A.
Material Features of the Omnibus Incentive Plan
General. The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides that awards may be in any of the following forms: (1) incentive stock options; (2) nonstatutory stock options (incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options are together referred to as “options”); (3) appreciation rights; (4) share awards; (5) restricted shares; (6) deferred shares; (7) performance bonuses; (8) performance shares; (9) directors shares; (10) performance units; and (11) dividend equivalents.
Dividend equivalents may be granted in connection with share awards (other than options and appreciation rights). Awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan may be settled in cash, our common shares, or a combination of cash and shares, as provided in the terms of each award agreement.
Subject to adjustment in certain circumstances as described below, the Omnibus Incentive Plan authorizes up to 2,800,000 Class A common shares and 700,000 Class B common shares. If approved, the Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan would increase this to 4,400,000 Class A common shares and 1,100,000 Class B common shares. Shares subject to grants will become available again for purposes of the Omnibus Incentive Plan: (1) if and to the extent options and appreciation rights granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan terminate,
- 14 -
expire or are cancelled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered after the effective date of the Omnibus Incentive Plan without being exercised; or (2) if any share awards or dividend equivalents are forfeited, terminated or otherwise not paid in full after the effective date of the Omnibus Incentive Plan. In addition, any portion of an award that is payable only in cash pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement will be immediately available again for purposes of the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of common shares, or its equivalent, that can be the subject of awards made to an individual during any fiscal year is 500,000 Class A and 500,000 Class B common shares, but not to exceed 500,000 common shares collectively, subject to adjustment as described below (the “Individual Limit”). In addition, the number of performance shares and units awarded to an individual may not exceed an aggregate value of $5,000,000 as of the Grant Date (determined based on the fair market value of our Class A common shares as of the grant date).
Where two or more awards are granted in relation to each other so that the exercise and payment of one award automatically affects the number of shares that may be issued in connection with the exercise of the related award, only the maximum amount that can be issued in connection with both related awards in the aggregate will be counted against the number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan.
If approved by the shareholders, the Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan will become effective as of April 17, 2009, the date it was approved by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of our Board of Directors.
Management. The Omnibus Incentive Plan is managed and interpreted by the “Committee.” Except to the extent required by law, the Committee means the Board or the Board’s Compensation and Management Development Committee, or such other committee or designee appointed by the Board or the Committee’s delegate. The Committee has the authority to (1) determine the individuals to whom grants will be made under the Omnibus Incentive Plan; (2) determine the type, size and terms of the grants; (3) determine the time when grants will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability; (4) amend the terms of any previously issued grant, subject to the limitations described below; (5) adopt guidelines separate from the Omnibus Incentive Plan that set forth the specific terms and conditions for grants under the Omnibus Incentive Plan; and (6) deal with any other matters arising under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The determinations of the Committee are made in its sole discretion and are final, binding and conclusive. The Compensation and Management Development Committee presently consists of Scott S. Cowen, Joseph S. Hardin, Jr., Jeffrey D. Dunn and Charles A. Ratner, each of whom is a non-employee director of American Greetings. Day to day administrative functions of the Omnibus Incentive Plan are performed by our employees. Moreover, the Committee may delegate to our officers or managers the authority to grant awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan from a preauthorized pool of shares to individuals authorized to receive awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Eligibility for Participation. Key employees (including executive officers and members of the Board of Directors), non-employee directors and consultants of American Greetings and our subsidiaries selected by the Committee are eligible for grants under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. As of May 1, 2009, approximately 402 employees and 7 non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Types of Awards. The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides that awards may be in any of the following forms:
Stock Options. The Committee may grant options intended to qualify as incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or so-called “nonstatutory stock options” that are not intended to so qualify or any combination of incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options. Anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan may receive a grant of nonstatutory stock options. Only our employees may receive a grant of incentive stock options. No more than 2,800,000 Class A common shares and
- 15 -
700,000 Class B common shares may be issued as incentive stock options under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. If approved, the Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan would increase this to 4,400,000 Class A common shares and 1,100,000 Class B common shares.
The Committee fixes the exercise price per share for options on the date of grant. The exercise price of any incentive stock option granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan will be equal to or greater than the fair market value (the closing price of our Class A common shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange) of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant.
The Committee determines the term of each option; provided, however, that the term may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The vesting period for options commences on the date of grant and ends on such date as is determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, which is specified in the grant letter. Options may be exercised while the participant is employed by or providing service to us or within a specified period of time after termination of such employment or service, as determined by the Committee. A participant may exercise an option by delivering notice of exercise to us or our designated agent. The participant may pay the exercise price and any withholding taxes for the option in several ways: (1) in cash or by check; (2) by delivering common shares already owned by the participant and having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the exercise price or through attestation to ownership of such shares; (3) with respect to Class A common shares by delivery of a properly executed notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to us the amount of sale proceeds to pay the exercise price and related withholding taxes on the settlement date that occurs after the date specified in the notice of exercise; (4) with respect to Class B common shares, through attestation of the ability to pay the exercise price followed by immediate tendering of such shares to us and our immediate repurchase of such shares in accordance with our amended and restated articles of incorporation; or (5) by such other method as the Committee may approve, to the extent permitted by applicable law. The Committee may provide that an option will be substituted with an appreciation right that will be subject to the same number of underlying shares as the substituted option.
Appreciation Rights. The Committee may grant appreciation rights to anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Appreciation rights may be granted in connection with, or independent of, other awards. Upon exercise of an appreciation right, the participant will receive an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of our common shares on the date of exercise over the base amount set forth in the grant letter. Such payment to the participant will be in cash, in common shares, or in a combination of cash and common shares, as determined by the Committee. The Committee will determine the period when appreciation rights vest and become exercisable. Appreciation rights may be exercised while the participant is employed by or providing service to us or within a specified period of time after termination of such employment or service, as determined by the Committee.
Deferred Shares and Restricted Shares. The Committee may grant share awards to anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Committee may require that participants pay consideration for the share awards and may impose restrictions on the share awards (referred to in the Omnibus Incentive Plan as “restricted shares”). If restrictions are imposed on share awards, the Committee will determine whether they will lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Committee determines appropriate. The Committee determines the number of common shares subject to the grant of share awards and the other terms and conditions of the grant. The Committee will determine to what extent, and under what conditions, a participant will have the right to vote common shares and to receive dividends or other distributions paid on such shares during the restriction period. The Committee may determine that a participant’s entitlement to dividends or other distributions with respect to share awards will be subject to the achievement of performance goals or other conditions.
Performance Units. The Committee may grant performance units to anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Performance units may be granted in connection with, or independent of, other awards. Each performance unit provides the participant with the right to receive an amount based on the value of a
- 16 -
common share if specified performance goals are met. The Committee determines the number of performance units that will be granted, the performance goals, the target amount that will be paid, and the other terms and conditions applicable to the performance shares. Payments with respect to performance units will be made in cash, in common shares, or in a combination of cash and common shares, as determined by the Committee.
Performance Shares. The Committee may grant performance shares to anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Performance shares may be granted in connection with, or independent of, other awards. Each performance share provides the participant with the right to receive a common share or an amount based on the value of a common share, if specified performance goals are met. The Committee determines the number of performance shares that will be granted, the performance goals, the target amount that will be paid, and the other terms and conditions applicable to the performance shares. Payments with respect to performance shares will be made in cash, in common shares, or in a combination of cash and common shares, as determined by the Committee.
Other Share Awards. The Committee may grant other types of share awards that would not otherwise constitute options, appreciation rights, deferred shares, restricted shares, performance shares or dividend equivalents. The Committee may grant other share awards to anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. These grants will be based on or measured by common shares, and will be payable in cash, in common shares, or in a combination of cash and common shares. The terms and conditions for these grants will be determined by the Committee.
Directors Shares. Directors may elect to receive Class A or Class B common shares in lieu of any fees owed to them for services performed while on the Board. Such shares shall be in an amount equal in value to such fees, based on the closing price of our Class A common shares reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the last trading day of the calendar quarter immediately prior to the payment of such fees. Directors who elect to receive shares in lieu of fees may also elect, pursuant to our Outside Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, to defer the receipt of such shares for a period specified in such plan. Shares reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan will be used to satisfy our obligation to deliver director shares, including deferred shares and any dividend equivalents accrued on deferred shares, following the effective date of the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Performance Bonus. The Committee may grant a performance bonus in cash or shares to participants in incentive compensation plans maintained by us, including the American Greetings Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. These grants will be payable in cash, in common shares, or in a combination of cash and common shares. The Committee will decide whether a performance bonus will become payable if specified performance goals or conditions are met.
Dividend Equivalents.The Committee may provide dividend equivalents in share awards (other than options or appreciation rights), which permit the grantee to receive with respect to shares subject to an award the equivalent value of dividends paid on our common shares. Dividend equivalents are payable in cash or common shares and may be paid currently or accrued as contingent obligations. Dividend equivalents may accrue interest. The terms and conditions of dividend equivalents are determined by the Committee.
Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The Omnibus Incentive Plan permits the Committee to impose and specify objective performance goals that must be met with respect to awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Committee will determine the performance periods for the performance goals. Forfeiture of all or part of any such grant will occur if the performance goals are not met, as determined by the Committee. Prior to, or soon after the beginning of, the performance period, the Committee will establish in writing the performance goals that must be met, the applicable performance periods, the amounts to be paid if the performance goals are met, and any other conditions.
The performance goals, to the extent designed to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, will be based on one or more of the following measures: revenue; gross margin; product line contribution; operating and other expenses; operating earnings; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
- 17 -
amortization; earnings before interest and taxes; pre-tax or after-tax profits; net income; earnings per share; cash flow; productivity; return on assets; return on capital; return on equity; cash flow/net assets; debt/capital ratio; return on net capital employed; sales growth; stock price appreciation; or total shareholder return (share appreciation plus dividends as if reinvested), and may be absolute in their terms or measured against or in relationship to other companies comparably, similarly or otherwise situated. The foregoing measures may be based on the employee’s business unit or the performance of American Greetings or American Greetings’ subsidiaries independently or as a whole, or a combination of the foregoing.
Deferrals. The Committee may permit or require participants to defer receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of common shares that would otherwise be due to the participant in connection with a grant under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Committee will establish the rules and procedures applicable to any such deferrals.
Adjustment Provisions. If there is any change in the number or kind of common shares by reason of: (1) a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split, or combination or exchange of shares; (2) a merger, reorganization or consolidation; (3) a recapitalization or change in par value; or (4) any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding common shares as a class, or if the value of outstanding common shares is substantially reduced as a result of a spin-off, split-up or American Greetings’ payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the number of common shares available for grants, the limit on the number of common shares for which any individual may receive pursuant to grants in any year, the number of shares covered by outstanding grants, the kind of shares to be issued or transferred under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such grants will be appropriately adjusted by the Committee to reflect any increase or decrease in the number or kind of issued common shares in order to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of the rights and benefits under such grants.
Foreign Participants. If any individual who receives a grant under the Omnibus Incentive Plan is subject to taxation in countries other than the United States, the Omnibus Incentive Plan provides that the Committee may make grants to such individuals on such terms and conditions as the Committee determines appropriate to comply with the laws of the applicable countries.
Repricing of Options and Reloads. The Omnibus Incentive Plan includes a restriction providing that, without shareholder approval, neither the Committee nor the Board of Directors can (1) authorize any option grant to provide for “reload” rights, the automatic grant of options to the participant upon the exercise of options using shares or other equity, or (2) amend or replace options previously granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan in a transaction that constitutes a “repricing” as that term is defined under the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. Adjustments to the exercise price or number of common shares subject to an option to reflect the effects of a stock split or other extraordinary corporate transaction will not constitute a “repricing.”
Amendment and Termination of the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation and Management Development Committee may amend or terminate the Omnibus Incentive Plan at any time, subject to shareholder approval if such approval is required under any applicable laws or stock exchange requirements. No grants may be issued under the Omnibus Incentive Plan after February 12, 2017.
The last sales price of our Class A common shares on May 1, 2009, was $7.73 per share. There is no public market for our Class B common shares.
New Omnibus Incentive Plan Benefits
It is not possible to determine specific amounts that may be awarded in the future under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended. As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, subject to shareholder approval of the amendment to the Omnibus Incentive Plan at the Annual Meeting, the Committee approved a performance share award program under which, on April 17, 2009, the Committee granted on an aggregate basis 1,458,000 performance shares to a total of 95 employees of the
- 18 -
company, including the named executive officers. If the amendment is approved, participants (including named executive officers) who receive performance share award grants may earn all or a portion of such shares based on the company achieving certain performance goals during the next two to three years and the satisfaction of time-based vesting requirements following the achievement of such goals. Any award not earned will be forfeited. The number of the performance shares that may be earned pursuant to the April 17, 2009 grant are not determinable at this time because they are performance-based and subject to time-based vesting requirements, such that, depending on the company’s performance and satisfaction of the applicable vesting requirements, all, some or none of the shares will be earned and issued. The market value of the shares underlying the April 17, 2009 grant as of May 1, 2009 was $7.73 per share.
Our awards of options to purchase Class A or Class B common shares and our cash incentive compensation payments (under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan) are not subject to shareholder approval of the proposed amendment to the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Information Concerning Executive Officers” sections of this Proxy Statement for information regarding those awards.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The federal income tax consequences arising with respect to awards granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan will depend on the type of the award. The following provides only a general description of the application of federal income tax laws to certain awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. This discussion is intended for the information of shareholders considering how to vote at the Annual Meeting and not as tax guidance to participants in the Omnibus Incentive Plan, as the consequences may vary with the types of awards made, the identity of the recipients and the method of payment or settlement. The summary does not address the effects of other federal taxes (including possible “golden parachute” excise taxes) or taxes imposed under state, local, or foreign tax laws.
From the recipients’ standpoint, as a general rule, ordinary income will be recognized at the time of payment of cash or delivery of actual common shares. Future appreciation on common shares held beyond the ordinary income recognition event will be taxable at capital gains rates when the shares are sold. As a general rule, we will be entitled to a tax deduction that corresponds in time and amount to the ordinary income recognized by the recipient, and we will not be entitled to any tax deduction in respect of capital gain income recognized by the recipient.
Exceptions to these general rules may arise under the following circumstances: (1) if common shares, when delivered, are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture by reason of failure to satisfy any employment, service or performance-related condition, ordinary income taxation and our tax deduction will be delayed until the risk of forfeiture lapses (unless the recipient makes a special election to ignore the risk of forfeiture); (2) if an employee is granted an option that qualifies as an “incentive stock option,” no ordinary income will be recognized, and we will not be entitled to any tax deduction, if common shares acquired upon exercise of such option are held more than the longer of one year from the date of exercise and two years from the date of grant; (3) we will not be entitled to a tax deduction for compensation attributable to awards granted to one of our named executive officers, if and to the extent such compensation does not qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and such compensation, along with any other non-performance-based compensation paid in the same fiscal year, exceeds $1 million; and (4) an award may be taxable to the recipient at 20 percentage points above ordinary income tax rates at the time it becomes vested, plus interest, even if that is prior to the delivery of the cash or common shares in settlement of the award, if the award constitutes “deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, and the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code are not satisfied.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a publicly-held corporation’s tax deduction for compensation paid to its chief executive officer or any of its three other most highly compensated officers (other than the chief financial officer) in excess of $1 million in any year. Compensation that qualifies as
- 19 -
“performance-based compensation” is excluded from the $1 million deductibility cap, and therefore remains fully deductible by the corporation that pays it.We intend that options and appreciation rights granted at the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant will qualify as performance-based compensation. Deferred shares, share awards, performance shares, dividend equivalents, other share awards and dollar-denominated awards granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan will only qualify as “performance-based compensation” when the Committee conditions such grants on the achievement of specific performance goals in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides that we have the right to require the recipient of any award under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to pay to us an amount necessary for us to satisfy our federal, state or local tax withholding obligations with respect to such grants. We may withhold from other amounts payable to such individual an amount necessary to satisfy these obligations. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, a participant may satisfy our withholding obligation by having shares acquired pursuant to the grant withheld, provided that the number of shares withheld does not exceed the individual’s minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal, state and local tax liabilities. The Omnibus Incentive Plan also provides that the Committee may permit a participant to satisfy our withholding obligation that exceeds the minimum applicable withholding tax rate by transferring to us previously acquired common shares.
Availability of Omnibus Incentive Plan Document
The full text of the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan as amended by the Amendment to Omnibus Incentive Plan is included as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors believes that the adoption of the Amendment to the American Greetings Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder will enable American Greetings to continue to provide significant equity-based and other incentives to employees, non-employee directors and consultants who are expected to contribute materially to our future success.Accordingly, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends approval of the Amendment to the American Greetings Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan by the shareholders.
- 20 -
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OverviewExecutive Summary
During fiscal 2012, our total revenue, operating results and cash flows were impacted by the multiple strategic actions we executed during the year to support both our short-term and long-term business goals, including:
continuing to drive product leadership initiatives;
driving growth in our product leadership, primarily our new Web site, Cardstore.com, through increased marketing spending;
deploying additional capital to fund our multi-year information technology systems refresh project intended to drive efficiencies in our business and add new capabilities;
expanding our international footprint through the acquisition of Watermark Publishing Limited in the United Kingdom;
supporting the expanded relationships and distribution with our retail partners through additional investment and rollout activities; and
strengthening our balance sheet by refinancing our debt.
Although these strategic actions, along with the continued instability in the global economy, brought volatility to our earnings, we believe that these actions will help us grow our business over the long term. Moreover, to mitigate the impact that some of these activities had or may have on our earnings, we continue to seek to improve efficiencies and streamline our supply chain and back office processes in order to reduce our supply chain and general and administrative expenses. To this end, our financial performance generally met or exceeded our expectations for fiscal 2012, where we exceeded our revenue and earnings per share goals and met our earnings before interest and taxes goal under the American Greetings Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. We accomplished these goals despite these activities as well as changes during the fiscal year that caused us to absorb unanticipated events and costs.
In fiscal 2009,2012, we continued with the same executive compensation philosophy that we have had in place for several years. We use this philosophy to determine the compensation programs and practices for all our executive officers, including our named executive officers who are listed in the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. The fundamental principle of this philosophy is performance – performance of the organization and its business units, and performance of the individual – compared to financial goals, strategic initiatives and individual goals. The compensation decisions we made in fiscal 20092012 were based on this principle.
In Accordingly, during fiscal 2009, in addition to our financial goals,2012, we measured our executive officers’ performance based, in part, on their contributions to achieving our major corporate initiatives, which were:
to increase revenue by enhancing our core product offerings, through new product and business development, and by exploiting growth opportunities in areas that are directly in, or adjacent to, our existing businesses;
optimization of our capital structure;
business process redesign, where we continue to redesign the processes and systems we use to develop, source and deliver our products;
continued cost savings, at the supply chain level and by reducing expenses through such activities as rationalizing certain business units and product lines; and
human capital development and improving the diversity of our workforce.
We did not make any significantmade few material changes to the structure of ourprincipal compensation programs for fiscal 2009 from the programsthat we had in place during fiscal 2011. However, beginning with grants made in fiscal 2008. Although2012, we adjustedrevised our equity compensation program to eliminate the granting of stock options so that our regular annual equity grant program now consists of all restricted stock units, or RSUs, rather than a combination of RSUs and stock options. The actual number of RSUs granted to each of our named executive officers’ base salariesofficers during fiscal 2012 was at the target level or higher, which was determined by the individual’s performance rating for fiscal 2011 and the target grant size for his position. The number of RSUs granted in May 2008,fiscal 2013 to our named executive officers was also at the target level or higher, which was determined by the individual’s performance rating for fiscal 2012 and the target grant size for his position. Additionally, in an effort to control costs foreliminate compensation programs offered by the company that are not widely utilized, yet are administratively burdensome to operate, in fiscal 2010, we have decided2012, the Compensation Committee determined to suspendfreeze our salary increase program for salaried associates for fiscal 2010,Executive Deferred Compensation Plan such that participants, including for the named executive officers.officers, are no longer permitted to make new deferral elections under this plan. In addition, we did not change the named executive officers’ target stock option grant levels or target cash incentive levelseffective in fiscal 2009 from2013, additional matching and profit sharing contributions under the prior year. However, becauseExecutive Deferred Compensation Plan’s maximizer and restoration benefits will not be provided.
As described below, the actual cash incentive payments are based on financial performance compared to the goals for the respective fiscal year, the actual payments we makemade to our named executive officers under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan may vary from year to year. As described below, in April 2012 were based on our fiscal 2009 American Greetings failed to achieve the minimum threshold2012 financial performance, levels for its corporate and business unit performance goals underwhich met or exceeded the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. As a result, we did not make any paymentsPlan’s earnings per share, or EPS, target of $2.40 per share,
17
Total Revenue target of $1,669.7 million and Corporate earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT, target of $180.2 million (or EPS target of $2.51 per share, Total Revenue target of $1,651.7 million, and Corporate EBIT target of $183.0 million, in each case as adjusted by the factors described below under “Key Management Annual Incentive Plan – General”), resulting in payouts to the named executive officers under the corporate and business unit components of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan at 105.2% and 100% of the target incentive percentages for their specific positions, respectively. In addition, under our salary increase program for North American salaried associates, in fiscal 2009. The actual number of stock options granted to2012, each of our named executive officers was at the target level or higher, which was determined by the individual’sreceived a base salary increase ranging from 3% to 14% based on his individual performance for fiscal 2009 and the target grant size for their position.other factors described below.
General Philosophy
We believe that our executive compensation program should enable us to attract, reward and retain those talented executives we need in our organization to achieve our objectives.key objectives and ultimately increase shareholder value. We also believe that our compensation program should reward our executives for achieving their goals. We believe that these goals should include components from corporate-wide, business unit and individual performance initiatives and that these goals should align the efforts and interests of the executives with the interests of American Greetings and, most importantly, the interests of our shareholders. Under our programs, executives who achieve their individual performance goals and who play a role in achieving the corporate and appropriateapplicable business unit goals may be awarded both cash and equity-based incentives.
We believe the elements ofthat our compensation program, individually and collectively,in total, should be competitive with compensation programs offered by other employers of similar size and in similar industries. We also believe
- 21 -
that the compensation grantedpaid to any one individual executive should be differentiated from that grantedpaid to our other executives based on the executive’s skills and experience, overall performance contributions, and performance compared to specific goals and objectives.
Board Processes
Although many compensation decisions are made in the first quarter of the fiscal year, our compensation planning process neither begins nor ends with any particular Compensation Committee meeting. Compensation decisions are designed to encourage and reward executives for accomplishing our fundamental business objectives and strategic goals within the principles of our compensation philosophy. Business planning, succession planning, evaluation of management performance and consideration of the business environment are year-round processes. Consequently, our compensation process is also a year-round process.
In establishing the compensation for fiscal 2009,2012, the Compensation Committee conducted a review of the compensation and performance of the Chief Executive Officer. After reviewing marketOfficer, and reviewed compensation data on similar positions in the marketplace, the Compensation Committee establishedprovided by Mercer, our independent compensation consultant, when establishing the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level.level, as described below in “Setting Compensation.” The Chief Executive Officer and/or the President and Chief Operating Officer conduct reviews ofreviewed the performance of the remaining executive officers (other than the Chairman).officers. They makethen made initial determinations of each executive officer’s individual performance and changes to base salary, subject to the review and approval of the Compensation Committee (which consulted from time to time consults with the Senior Vice President of Human Resources). The, which itself reviewed the compensation data provided by Mercer. Although management makes recommendations about designs for and, if warranted, changes to our compensation programs, in establishing the compensation for fiscal 2012, the Compensation Committee approvesapproved all management incentive and equity programs, all equity grants, and all retirement benefit programs in which executive officers or directors participate,participated, as well as all equity grants and any modificationcash payments made to a benefit or compensation program that has a material economic impact on American Greetings, aneach executive officer or a director.director made under any of these programs. Management recommendsrecommended for approval of the Compensation Committee allthe fiscal 2012 business performance targets upon which payments to executive officers arewere based. TheAs it relates to compensation for fiscal 2012, the Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources workworked with the Compensation Committee chair in establishing the agenda for Compensation Committee meetings.meetings and typically attended committee meetings (but were not present during executive sessions unless requested by the Committee). Management also preparesprepared meeting information and supporting materials for each Compensation Committee meeting. From time to time, executiveExecutive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the
18
President and Chief Operating Officer, the Chairman, and the Chairman, participateSenior Vice President of Human Resources, regularly participated in Compensation Committee meetings to provide:
background information regarding the compensation of our employees;
evaluations of the performance of executive officers;
recommendations with respect toon compensation proposalsplans and as toprograms and the actual compensation of executive officers; and
other information as may bewas requested by the Compensation Committee.
Setting Compensation
Compensation of Executive Officers Generally
To setIn connection with setting the actual compensation levels for each of our executive officers, generallyfrom time to time we first collect information from the marketplace on how other employers compensate people in similar positions. We use overallpositions, using industry data, consumer products industry data and, depending on the position, data from industry segments or specific companies.individual companies, specifically to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices. We usually relyfocus more heavily on data from consumer products companies because: (1) our core business is consumer products focused – we create, manufacture, market and distribute social expressionexpressions products sold to consumers; and (2) we often recruit employees from consumer product companies, or from companies that support or otherwise service the consumer products industry. Generally, for both the overall industry and consumer products market data, we look at companies with revenue that approximates our revenue. We typically obtain this data from broad-basedcompensation surveys that are published by such nationally recognized consulting firms, and in fiscal 2012, we used compensation data provided by Mercer to help assess and establish the compensation of our named executive officers, as Towers Perrin and Mercer.described below. Alternatively, as described below, we may commission a custom study by one of these consulting firms, using data held in their databases or information included in the
- 22 -
proxy statements and other public filings of companies similar to us. While information developed solely from public filings covers only those individuals for whom compensation information is disclosed publicly, generally these positions correlate to our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer and certain of our Senior Vice Presidents.
To determine the compensation to be paid to new executive officers, we take into account the market data for their specific position (to the degree it is available), their relevant experience and expected contribution to our business, and the compensation we believe will be required to attract and retain that individual. In general, compensation realized by executives from prior awards or grants made by us, such as gains from previously awarded stock options or equity awards, areis not taken into account in setting current compensation levels. We believe that our executive officers should be fairly compensated each year compared to market pay levels, internal equity among other executive officers and their own individual performance contributions.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer
To determine the overall amount ofIn setting compensation to be paid to each of our named executive officers in fiscal 2012, we reviewed compensation data provided by Mercer, which compared the compensation that we pay our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer, we consider compensation related information for similarnamed executive officers to that paid to executives with comparable positions in industrythe companies included in general as well asour fiscal 2012 comparison peer group described below. Mercer compared the compensation of these named executive officers against the companies in a selectour fiscal 2012 comparison peer group listed below to assist the Compensation Committee in its assessment of consumer products companies that we consider to be our peer group. To assist us in this evaluation, in March 2008, we engaged Towers Perrin to provide compensation related information from its proprietary databases for similar positions in industry in general and in companies that we consider to be our peer group. As it relateswhether any adjustment to the total compensation decisions we made in April 2008 concerningor any particular element of the compensation provided to our named executive officers was appropriate. Based on this analysis, Mercer determined that total cash compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer during fiscal 2009,named executive offers was above the peer group median, while long-term equity compensation was below the peer group median, resulting in total direct compensation generally falling below the peer group median. The Compensation Committee took these findings into account in setting fiscal 2012 compensation for our named executive officers, as described below under “Analysis of Compensation Elements Paid to Named Executive Officers.”
Although the peer groups that we evaluated consisted of the following companies: Callaway Golf Company, Columbia Sportswear Company, Revlon, Inc., Aeropostale, Inc., L.L. Bean, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Tupperware Brands Corporation, The Warnaco Group, Inc., Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, The J.M. Smucker Company, Brown-Forman Corporation, Mary Kay, Inc., AnnTaylor Stores Corporation, Brown Shoe Company, Inc., Wendy’s International, Inc., Coach, Inc., Tiffany & Co., Jack In The Box Inc., The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company,utilize are generally consistent from year to year, we periodically review and Hasbro, Inc. Ourupdate these peer group wascompanies to reflect changes in the companies themselves (such as resulting from bankruptcies or changes in control), changes in the marketplace and changes within American Greetings. Because there are few comparable greeting card companies with publicly available information, we selected these companies in consultation with Towers Perrin and chosenMercer because the nature of their businesses is similar to ours, in this case primarily in the housewares and specialties categories or otherwise with similar product lines, and they are considered representative of the companies with which we compete for executive talent. Our We also strive for the
19
peer group companies were also chosen from among companies with which we compare ourselves for compensation purposes consistingto collectively have median revenues, market value and/or a ratio of companies that resembled American Greetings in revenue size – havingmarket value to revenues that when established, were generally between one-half and two and one-half timesare similar to those of American Greetings. Based on the foregoing, we used the following peer companies for purposes of assessing the compensation paid to our named executive officers in fiscal 2012. The median peer group revenue, market value and ratio of market value to revenue considered when assessing compensation paid at the peer group companies set forth below relative to the compensation paid to our named executive officers for fiscal 2012 were $1,597 million, $955 million and 0.76, respectively, compared to our revenue, market value and market value to revenue ratio of $1,636 million, $898 million and 0.55, respectively:
Fiscal 2012 Comparison Group | ||
• Alberto-Culver Company | • Herbalife, Ltd. | |
• Blyth, Inc. | • JAKKS Pacific, Inc. | |
• Callaway Golf Company | • Jarden Corporation | |
• Central Garden & Pet Company | • Libbey Inc. | |
• Church & Dwight, Inc. | • McCormick & Co. | |
• CSS Industries, Inc. | • Revlon, Inc. | |
• Lifetime Brands, Inc. | • Scholastic Corporation | |
• Elizabeth Arden, Inc. | • The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | |
• Energizer Holdings, Inc. | • Tupperware Brands Corp. | |
• Hasbro, Inc. |
During fiscal 2012, we modified our peer group, removing three of the companies (Alberto-Culver Company, McCormick & Co. and Herbalife, Ltd.) that were considered in setting compensation for fiscal 2012, either because, in the case of Alberto-Culver Company, it is no longer a publicly-traded company, or, in the case of McCormick & Co. and Herbalife Ltd., the nature of their products and their valuations were not consistent with the other companies in our peer group. In fiscal 2012, we also added two companies, Spectrum Brands, which was previously in our peer group but was removed as a result of its bankruptcy, and Nu Skin Enterprises, both of which we added because they fit within the size parameters and the industry/product context of the other peer group companies. The median peer group revenue, market value and ratio of market value to revenue considered in establishing the peer group companies set forth below for compensation paid to our named executive officers in fiscal 2013 were $1,530 million, $891 million and 0.54, respectively, compared to our revenue, market value and market value to revenue ratio of $1,593 million, $863 million and 0.54, respectively.
Fiscal 2013 Comparison Group | ||
• Blyth, Inc. | • Jarden Corporation | |
• Callaway Golf Company | • Libbey Inc. | |
• Central Garden & Pet Company | • Lifetime Brands, Inc. | |
• Church & Dwight, Inc. | • Nu Skin Enterprises | |
• CSS Industries, Inc. | • Revlon, Inc. | |
• Elizabeth Arden, Inc. | • Scholastic Corporation | |
• Energizer Holdings, Inc. | • Spectrum Brands | |
• Hasbro, Inc. | • The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | |
• JAKKS Pacific, Inc. | • Tupperware Brands Corp. |
Elements of Executive Compensation
The compensation program for our named executive officers generally consists of the following elements:
Base salaries;
Annual cash incentive awards;
Long-term equity compensation, principally stock options;compensation;
Benefits;
Perquisites; and
Termination and/or change in control protection.
20
We have selected these compensation elements to create a flexible package that bases much of its payout on the performance of the individual executive, the business unit to which that executive is assigned and the total corporation.
In arriving at our decision on 2012 executive compensation, we took into account the affirmative shareholder ‘say-on-pay’ vote at the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. Because a substantial majority (over 90%) of our shareholders approved the compensation program described in our proxy statement in 2011, we continued to apply the same principles in determining the amounts and types of executive compensation and did not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a result of the shareholder advisory vote. After consideration of the voting results of the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, and based upon our prior recommendation, we elected to hold say-on-pay votes on a triennial basis. Accordingly, we expect to hold our next say-on-pay vote in connection with our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.
- 23 -
Allocation Among Elements
Under our compensation structure, the mix of base salary, annual cash incentive and equity compensation as a percentage of total direct compensation varies depending upon the position’s level in management. However,We reviewed compensation data provided by Mercer in setting fiscal 2012 compensation for our named executive officers, but we generally target the market median for each component, and we target the market median foralso evaluated the total compensation paid to our named executive officers. officers considering a number of factors in addition to market pay levels. For example, in considering total compensation, as well as the allocation among the elements of compensation, we consider such factors as company performance, internal equity among other executive officers, retention and each executive’s individual performance contributions. Each of these factors is assessed qualitatively and there are no specific weightings given to any criteria. Based on the compensation data provided by Mercer and described above in “Setting Compensation,” we found that the target total cash compensation (generally base salary plus the target cash bonus under our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan) paid to our named executive officers was generally above the market median, while long-term equity compensation paid to our named executive officers as a group was generally below the market median, resulting in total direct compensation paid to our named executive officers as a group being below the market median.
There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocationallocating between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. In allocating compensation among these elements, we believe that the compensation of our most senior most levels of management – the levels of management having the greatest ability to influence American Greetings’ performance – should have a significant portion of their compensation at risk, and should be paid only on the accomplishment of pre-established goals and objectives. We believe that lower levels of management should receive a greater portion of their compensation in base salary – with less variability – because they have less of an ability to significantly affect the financial performance of the business. In applying the principle
Analysis of compensation at riskCompensation Elements Paid to the compensation of our ChiefNamed Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer, we used information gathered from our peer group of companies described above. For our other named executive officers we used information gathered from overall industry data, consumer products industry data and, depending on the officer, specific industry segments or companies.Officers
Base Salaries
General.General. Base salaries are provided to compensate the executive for performing the essential responsibilities of the job. To determine individualhis or her job, as well as to provide market-competitive compensation to attract, retain and motivate exceptional executive talent. We evaluate each named executive officer’s base salaries,salary annually, and when making changes we consider:
the market data on comparable positions;
the executive officer’s qualifications, relevant experience and future potential;
the executive officer’s contributions to the organization, including accomplishment of individual goals and objectives;
the company’s financial results; and
internal pay equity.
The market data on comparable positions is based on overall industry data, consumer products industry data and, depending on the executive officer, data from industry segments or specific companies. We do not perform comprehensive studies of total compensation programs in the market every year. However, we do gather data on incremental changes occurring in the industry segments described above annually, primarily changes to base salaries. We evaluate each executive officer’s base salary annually, and when making changes – increases or decreases – we consider:
the executive’s individual annual performance, compared to pre-established goals and objectives;
any changes in responsibilities and roles;
any significant differences between the executive officer’s base salary and the base salaries of comparable executives in the market;market, specifically among our peer group; and
any changes in base salaries that other consumer products companies generally are making for their executives in comparable positions.internal pay equity.
Salary adjustments, if any, normally take effect on May 1st, of each year, based on performance in the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Named Executive Officers. In April 2008, the Compensation Committee approved base salary increases for Mr. Zev Weiss, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Jeffrey Weiss, our President and Chief Operating Officer, of approximately 3% each, to $921,459 for Mr. Zev Weiss and $721,268 for Mr. Jeffrey Weiss – effective May 1, 2008. As described in our Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2008, these salary increases were based on fiscal 2008 performance, including the officers’ individual performance during fiscal 2008, their roles in achieving our overall corporate goals for fiscal 2008 and, as
- 24 -
described above underNamed Executive Officers. To determine the heading “Setting Compensation,” the compensation data we gathered with respect to companies in the peer group. In addition, their salaries were increased as part of the Compensation Committee’s fiscal 2006 determination to move their base salaries closer to the market median of comparable consumer product companies over several years. After giving effect to the April 2008 increases, Mr. Zev Weiss’s salary was at a level slightly below and Mr. Jeffrey Weiss’s salary was at a level above the median base salary of comparable positions in our peer group.
In April 2008, we increased Mr. Goulder’s base salary by 5%, bringing his salary to $477,735. As described in our Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2008, this increase was based on fiscal 2008 performance, including his overall individual performance and achievement of individual performance goals during fiscal 2008 as well as competitive salary practices. In setting Mr. Smith’s base salary, we considered both specific market and industry data, and his additional responsibilities, skills and prior experience. Effective May 1, 2008, Mr. Smith’s salary was increased by 8%, bringing his salary to $386,100. As described in our Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2008, this increase was based on fiscal 2008 performance, including Mr. Smith’s overall individual performance and achievement of individual performance goals during fiscal 2008, as well as market data on comparable positions with other employers.
When the role of Mr. Morry Weiss as Chief Executive Officer was transitioned to Mr. Zev Weiss in June 2003, Morry Weiss remained in the position of the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Because of the continued executive oversight and responsibilities maintained by Morry Weiss as the Chairman, beginning in fiscal 2004, Mr. Weiss’s base annual salary was set at $400,000, and, as described below, his target stock option grant level was set at options to purchase 18,000 Class B common shares and his target incentive under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan was set at 50% of his annual base salary. During fiscal 2009, Morry Weiss’s base annual salary remained fixed at $400,000.
In assessing the individual performance of the Chief Executive Officer for purposes of both evaluating his base salary to be paid to himthe Chief Executive Officer in fiscal 2010,2012, as well as in determiningto determine his compensation under the individual performance component of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan and his optionequity grant level, the Compensation Committee assessed the Chief Executive Officer’s performance during, fiscal 2009 and his contributionscontribution to our results in, fiscal 2009. In particular, the2011. The Compensation Committee primarily considered our financial performance, including objectives based on achieving financial goals established under our earnings per share and cash flow performance, as well as2011 Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee also considered the Chief Executive Officer’s other individual performance goals established for fiscal 2011, which were based on his contributions to the achievement of our major corporate initiatives, as described above, including:
to increase revenue by enhancing our coredriving product offerings, through new productleadership;
completing the integration of the Papyrus wholesale business and business development, and by exploiting growth opportunities in areas that are directly in, or adjacent to, ourRecycled Paper Greetings into the existing businesses;
optimization of our capital structure;developing new, and growing existing, businesses;
business process redesign, where we continuecontinuing to redesign the processes and systems we use to develop, source and deliver our products;products to improve efficiency and execution;
continuedcontinuing to achieve supply chain cost savings, at the supply chain level and by reducing expenses through such activities as rationalizing certain business units and product lines; and
developing our human capital development and improving the diversity of our workforce.
Each of these goals is primarily assessed qualitatively and there are no specific weightings given to any criteria. However, due to American Greetings’ failure to meet its financial goals, coupled with the impact of, and future uncertainty resulting from, the global recession, theThe Compensation Committee determined not to changethat for fiscal 2011, Mr. Zev Weiss exceeded these objectives. Also, in assessing the base salary ofto be paid to the Chief Executive Officer forin fiscal 2010. Similarly, because American Greetings failed to achieve its financial goals under both2012, the corporate and business unit components ofCompensation Committee considered the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan and because Mr. Weiss achieved only some of his personal goalscompensation data provided by Mercer, as described above Mr. Weiss received no payments under “Setting Compensation,” where it found that Plan. However, because oftarget total cash compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer was above the market median, while long-term equity compensation continued to be below the market median, resulting in total direct compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer being below the market median. Based on Mr. Zev Weiss’s achievementsperformance, and in such areas as optimizing our capital structure and creating opportunities throughconsideration for the recent acquisitioncompetitiveness of Recycled
- 25 -
Paper Greetings,his total cash compensation, effective May 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined thatincreased Mr. Zev Weiss had met enough of his objectives for purposes of awarding a stock option grant at 100% of the target grant level as described below under the heading “Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”Weiss’s salary by 4%, from $949,103 to $987,067.
In assessing the base salaries to be paid in fiscal 2010 to each named executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer in fiscal 2012, the Compensation Committee considered the compensation data provided by Mercer and described above under “Setting Compensation.” Also in assessing the Chairman,base salaries to be paid in fiscal 2012 to each named executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer, as well as in determining such officer’s compensation under the individual performance component of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan and their optionhis equity grant level, the Compensation Committee considered the Chief Executive Officer’s proposalproposed change to keep each named executive’s base salary, the same for fiscal 2010, together with his assessment of each other named executive officer’s performance during fiscal 20092011 relative to the officer’s individual performance objectives established at the beginning of the year.objectives. Our named executive officers’ individual performance goals are developed to ensure that the officers and the business units for which they are responsible are driving those resultsactions and initiatives that will ensure that the business units and the corporationcompany achieve their short-term financial objectives and their long-term strategic goals. These goals are designed to be internally consistent across business units and to collectively drive the achievement of our short- and long-term goals and strategies. These goals are generally assessed qualitatively, with no specific weightings given to any criteria.
The fiscal 20092011 goals for Mr. Jeffrey Weiss included objectives based on achieving the Corporate EPS goal and the Corporate EBIT goal described belowfinancial goals under the heading “Keyour 2011 Key Management Annual Incentive Plan,” as well as driving revenue growthreducing costs and improving efficiency through the strategic cardprocess improvement, beginning implementation of an enterprise resource planning system, beginning a globalization initiative, obtaining new retail customers, coreand improving product and new product development, and growing American Greetings’ entertainment business.yield. Mr. Jeffrey Weiss’s goals also included drivingincluded:
the integration of Recycled Paper Greetings and the Papyrus wholesale business;
introducing initiatives to support the company’s product leadership efforts;
expanding retail distribution channels; and
developing new and existing character properties.
22
Based on his exceeding most of his individual performance goals, and considering the compensation data provided by Mercer and described above under “Setting Compensation,” where it found that his target total cash compensation was above the market median, while long-term equity compensation continued cost savings and supply chain efficiencies, as well as human capital development and improvingto be below the diversity of our workforce. market median, resulting in total direct compensation paid to be below the market median, effective May 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Jeffrey Weiss’s base salary by 4%, from $742,906 to $772,622.
The fiscal 2011 goals for Mr. Smith included:
objectives based on achieving the financial goals under our 2011 Key Management Annual Incentive Plan;
integrating Recycled Paper Greetings’ finance functions;
implementing audit governance best practices, procedures and control mechanisms;
strengthening the annual financial planning and performance processes;
implementing new payroll and other shared services administrative practices;
executing capital structure changes, such as buying back common shares; managingchanges;
overseeing significant tax benefits related to strategic changes; and
developing our human capital and improving workforce diversity.
The fiscal 2011 goals for Mr. Beeder included:
objectives based on achieving the financial operations ofgoals under our 2011 Key Management Annual Incentive Plan as well as achieving revenue growth in core accounts and business segments;
improving yield, business processes, and merchandising and planning functions;
strengthening business development through renewing, revising, and executing customer agreements and improved customer planning and management activities;
growing, harvesting and/or exiting specialty businesses;
improving retail productivity at core accounts;
implementing marketing activities to strengthen the company, including corporate brand;
leveraging the company’s inbound licensing activities;
improving the effectiveness of the finance departmentsales and reducing costs; successfully managing the conversion of new scan-based trading retail customers;marketing analytics; and
developing our human capital development and improving the diversity of our workforce. workforce diversity.
The fiscal 2011 goals for Mr. Goulder included:
effectively executing cost reduction in the supply chain as well as identifying future cost cuttingsavings initiatives;
improving productivity while decreasing costs;
partnering with commercial teams to improve yield, manage costs and grow sales and profitability;
improving service levels, including by manufacturing on time and by improving the retail point of sale fulfillment;fulfillment while minimizing inventory costs;
driving continuous improvement in the field sales organization; managing a cost efficient internal consulting group that supports cost-out programs, growth efforts and the identification and development of corporate strategic goals; implementing strategies to drive profitable growth;and
supporting key human resources, sustainability and human capital development and improving the diversitycorporate initiatives.
23
Based on Mr. Smith meeting most of our workforce. Thesehis individual performance goals, are generally qualitative in nature and there are no specific weightings given to any criteria.
Mr. Morry Weiss’s base salary has been fixed at $400,000 since fiscal 2004 when his role as Chief Executive Officer was transitioned to Mr. Zev Weiss. In fiscal 2007 the Committee evaluated whether his compensation, including his base salary should remain fixed at $400,000. In this regard, the Committee considered general market pay information provided by Towers Perrin for compensation paid by other companies to the positions of executive chairman, non-executive chairman and lead director. The Committee also considered Mr. Morry Weiss’s responsibilities as a member of the board of directors. Due to the executive duties that Mr. Morry Weiss performs in addition to his responsibilities as a director, including his significant role in such critical functions as mergers and acquisitions and other strategic initiatives, as well as his significant involvement in developing the company’s long-range strategic plans and counseling senior management,effective May 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined thatto increase Mr. Morry Weiss should be classified as an executive chairman for purposesSmith’s salary by 3%, from $424,711 to $437,453. Based on Mr. Beeder significantly exceeding most of compensation. Accordingly, the Committee determined his base salary should remain at $400,000, his target stock option grant level should remain fixed at 18,000 Class B common shares, and his target incentive award under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan should remain fixed at 50% of his annual base salary.
Although the individual performance goals, of the named executive officers were considered, because of American Greetings’ failure to meet its financial goals, coupled with the impact of, and future uncertainty resulting from, the global recession,effective May 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined not to changeincrease Mr. Beeder’s salary by 4% from $492,000 to $511,680. In addition, during the base salariesfirst half of anyfiscal 2012, Mr. Beeder assumed additional responsibilities over our AG Interactive operations. As a result of these increased responsibilities, together with the named executive officers. Becausesignificant contributions made to the organization since joining American Greetings failedin 2008, effective July 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Beeder’s salary by 10% from $511,680 to achieve its financial goals under both the corporate and business unit components of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, no named executive officer received any payments under these components of the Plan. Similarly, because Mr. Jeffrey Weiss and
- 26 -
$562,900. Based on Mr. Goulder did not achieve all of their personal goals, there was no payment to them under the individual component of the Plan. However, because the committee determined that Mr. Smith met or exceeded allmeeting most of his personal objectives, he was awarded a partial payment underindividual performance goals, effective May 1, 2011, the individual component of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan and was awarded a stock option grant at 115% of the target grant amount for his position. Based on their achievement of at least some of their personal objectives,Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Jeffrey Weiss and Mr. Goulder were awarded stock option grants at 100% of the target grant amounts for their positions.Goulder’s salary by 3% from $492,067 to $506,829.
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan
General.General. Consistent with our emphasis on pay for performance,pay-for-performance, we have established the American Greetings Corporation Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, under which our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are eligible to receive awards based on performance against annually established performance goals. These goals include company-wide and individual business unit financial measures for individual business units and the entire corporation, andas well as individual performance objectives. This plan is an important component of our compensation package because it is designed to focus our executive officers’ efforts on, and reward executive officers for, annual operating results that help create value for our shareholders. At its target level, in fiscal 20092012 the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan award representsrepresented between 31%41% and 44%50% of a named executive officer’s total cash compensation, and between 35% and 38% of a named executive officer’s total direct compensation, depending on the executive’s position.
The corporate performance goals for the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan are determined through our annual planning process, which generally begins in the December that precedes the beginning of the fiscal year. During this process, management develops an annual operating plan that is consistent with our strategic plan, and that contains specific, quantifiable annual financial goals. These goals are established for each business unit and for the corporationAmerican Greetings as a whole. Around the beginning of each fiscal year, the full Board of Directors meets with senior management and discusses and approves the operating plan for the subsequent fiscal year. The operating plan goals form the basis for the annual incentive performance measures and goals. TheIn this manner, the Board of Directors approvesapproved the annual operating plan, and its financial goals and objectives, for each year.fiscal 2012. Similarly, for fiscal 2012, the Compensation Committee approvesapproved these operating plan goals, as adjusted by the factors described below, as the incentive plan’s financial objectives for both the corporate and business unit components of the incentive plan for executive officers each year.officers.
Any awards granted under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan are determined at year-end based on actual performance against the pre-established specific corporate, business unit and individual goals. The Chief Executive Officer reviews each named executive officer’s individual performance (other than the Chairman’s) and recommends to the Compensation Committee for its approval the level of compensation the officer should receive based on his individual performance. The Committee itself evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman does not have individual performance goals, rather the performance of the Chairman is evaluated based on our achievement of the corporate and business unit goals, although the Committee retains the discretion to lower the amount of compensation that the Chairman may receive under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. The incentive plan award payments to any named executive officer must be reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee prior to payment. The Compensation Committee may modify the recommendation provided by the Chief Executive Officer with respect to any named executive officer, which in turn affects payment under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee must approve any adjustments to the financial goals applicable to executive officers for purposes of determining if a business unit or the corporationcompany has achieved its goals. Except as otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, permitted adjustments are determined at the same time that the financial goals are initially established at the beginning of each year. These adjustments are described in a manner that can be objectively determined and are intended to account for items, events or changes in the business or its plans that, may occur during the year, such that the goals established at the beginning of the yearif included, would either (1) not be a meaningful measure of performance, without taking into account these events or other changes.(2) not appropriately incentivize management. When made, these adjustments apply to all managers, including the named executive officers, who are assigned to the business unit for which the adjustment is being granted or, in the case of an adjustment to a corporationcorporate goal, these adjustments apply to all managers, including the named executive officers. With respect to the corporate and business unit
- 27 -
business unit goals established under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal 2009,2012, these goals are calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.principles, or GAAP. However, at the beginning of the fiscal year2012, when the goals were established, the Committee determined that the following items or events, if they occur, should be excluded, and the Corporate EPS, Total Revenue and Corporate EBIT goals, as applicable, and results as measured against such goals should be adjusted accordingly, if they were not otherwise previously factored into the financial goals:
Charges related to management bonus plans;
Gains, losses or expenses for the fiscal year determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrenceoccurrence;
Gains, losses or expenses for the fiscal year related to the acquisition or disposal of a segment or business all as determined in accordance with GAAP;
Gains, losses or expenses for the fiscal year related to a change in accounting principles, allprinciple, as determinedconsistently applied;
Charges related to head count and other reductions in accordance with applicable standards established by the Accounting Principles Board;force, including severance;
Gains, losses or expenses for the fiscal year related to restructuring charges, discontinued operations and fixed asset sales;
GainsTranslational gains or losses arising from changes in foreign exchange rates;
Non-cash long-lived asset impairment charges;
Gains, losses or expenses associated with plant closings;
One-time inventoryInventory buy-back expenses incurred in connection with the conversion of a customer to a scan-based trading relationship;
The unplanned effect of acquisitions and dispositions;
The amount by which upfront payments, investments or other expenditures incurred in connection with new or amended retail contracts are in excess of revenue that areis generated from such contracts during the fiscal year;
The impact of repurchases of the company’sour debt or capital stock in the open market or otherwise; and
The effect of capital restructuring initiatives.initiatives, including refinancing of indebtedness.
Performance Measures.Measures. The terms (other than the actual performance goals, which vary from year to year, and certain other changes made to the plan) ofUnder the fiscal 20092012 Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, for our named executive officers are generally the same as the terms of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan that was in effect for fiscal 2008. Under the plan, incentives are awarded to our named executive officers based on three components: (1) corporate performance (weighted at 30%), (2) business unit performance (weighted at 50%), and (3) individual performance (weighted at 20%). To further focus our executives on achieving the corporate and business unit goals, for fiscal 2009 the Compensation Committee increased the weighting for executive officers of the business unit performance component from 40% in fiscal 2008 to 50% in fiscal 2009 and decreased the weighting of the individual performance component from 30% in fiscal 2008 to 20% in fiscal 2009.
For the named executive officers:
• | thecorporate component is based on performance compared to an earnings per share (Corporate EPS) goal |
• | thebusiness unit component is based on performance compared to a consolidated corporate earnings before interest and taxes (Corporate EBIT) goal, after adjustments for variations in net capital employed compared to the financial plan, with a charge/credit at the weighted average cost of capital; and |
• | theindividual component is generally based on the officer’s individual performance compared to performance goals and objectives that are designed to ensure the achievement of the business unit and corporate goals, as well as any longer-term strategic |
The primary measure for performance under the corporate component of our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan is earnings per share, or Corporate EPS.EPS, weighted at 90% of the 30% target award for the corporate component. Because of its direct correlation to the interests of our shareholders, we believe an EPS goal is a good measure of overall management performance. To provide an incentive for the profitable growth of
25
corporate revenue, the Corporate EPS performance measure is complemented by a total revenue performance measure, weighted at 10% of the 30% target award for the corporate component. We measure Corporate EPS and Total Revenue at the end of the fiscal year. ItCorporate EPS is calculated as the annual corporateconsolidated net income divided by the planned total number of shares outstanding as calculated on a fully diluted basis, adjusted for any shares repurchased duringby the fiscal
- 28 -
year. To provide an incentive forfactors described above in this section under “General.” Total Revenue is calculated as consolidated net sales and other revenues, including but not limited to royalties, advertising, subscriptions and other revenue streams directly related to the profitable growthconduct of corporate revenue,our principal business, adjusted by the Corporate EPS performance measure also incorporates a revenue component that provides that even if the Corporate EPS goal is attained, the payout will be increased or decreased based on whether the company achieves certain revenue growth goals. However, even if the revenue goal is attained, if the Corporate EPS goal is not achieved, there will be no payoutfactors described above in this section under the Corporate EPS goal.“General.” For fiscal 2009,2012, the Corporate EPS goal was $1.83$2.40 per share (or $2.51 per share, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General”) and the revenueTotal Revenue goal was $1,861.4 million.$1,669.7 million (or $1,651.7 million, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General”).
The performance measure under the business unit component of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan for our named executive officers is Corporate EBIT, which is consolidated corporate earnings before interest and taxes, or Corporate EBIT.as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General.” We believe Corporate EBIT is a good way to measure the operating performance of our business as a whole, and is a measure that also is in the direct interest of our shareholders. In determining performance against the Corporate EBIT goal, in addition to the factors described above in this section under “General,” we adjust the performance to reflect any variance from the planned net capital employed. We believe it is important to include such an adjustment for net capital employed because it ensures an appropriate emphasis on balance sheet management. In addition, the Corporate EBIT goal is measured on a pre-tax basis because (1) we believe a pre-tax measure more accurately reflects actual operating performance; (2) despite planning efforts, tax payments and refunds can be somewhat unpredictable; as a result, including tax as an operating metric can lead to wide swings in performance relative to goal; and (3) not allonly a few of our executives are in a position to control variables that impact operating profit on an after-tax basis. The Corporate EBIT goal for fiscal 20092012 was $160.2 million.$180.2 million (or $183.0 million, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General”).
The Compensation Committee set the Corporate EPS and Corporate EBIT goals at levels that were approximately 24% and 12%, respectively, higher than the levels established for the prior year. Although the goals for fiscal 2012 did not represent an increase over the actual, adjusted results achieved in fiscal 2011 under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, the fiscal 2012 goals were set at levels that the Committee believed reflected a stretch for management given the continuing uncertainty in the business environment at that time, while representing goals that still provided an attainable incentive.
For our named executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer, and the Chairman, the individual performance component is based on both the executive’s accomplishment of specific goals and objectives, and a comparison of the executive’s performance with that of other executive officers.officers, as well as that executive’s contribution to the achievement of our corporate and business unit goals. The performance of the Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer is evaluated based on the achievement of our corporate and business unit goals, and their achievement of their individual goals and objectives. There are no specificOur named executive officers’ individual performance goals are developed to ensure that the officers and the business units for which they are responsible are driving those actions and initiatives that will ensure that the Chairman, whose performance is evaluatedbusiness units and the company achieve their short-term financial objectives and their long-term strategic goals. These goals are designed to be internally consistent across business units, and to collectively drive the achievement of our short- and long-term goals and strategies. These individual goals are generally assessed qualitatively, with no specific weightings given to any criteria.
The fiscal 2012 goals for Mr. Zev Weiss included objectives based on achieving financial goals, including the Total Revenue and the Corporate EBIT goals described above. Mr. Zev Weiss’s goals also included:
growing our achievementproduct leadership position;
expanding our Internet and other channels of electronic distribution to make American Greetings the preferred physical and electronic greetings solution;
expanding our retail distribution channels;
strengthening performance with our retail customers and successfully integrating new customers;
26
executing initiatives to improve business processes, including the implementation of our enterprise resource planning system, as well as executing sustainable cost saving measures; and
continuing to develop our human capital and improving the diversity of our workforce.
The fiscal 2012 goals for Mr. Jeffrey Weiss included objectives based on achieving financial goals, including the Total Revenue and the Corporate EBIT goals described above, as well as the following:
executing initiatives to support our product leadership efforts;
strengthening performance with our retail customers and successfully integrating new customers;
pursuing profitable growth in our creative products division;
controlling costs and improving efficiency through process improvements;
supporting the implementation of the corporateinitial phases of an enterprise resource planning system;
expanding our Internet and other channels of electronic distribution to make American Greetings the preferred physical and electronic greetings solution;
beginning a globalization initiative;
expanding our retail distribution channels; and
developing new, and refreshing our existing, character properties.
The fiscal 2012 goals for Mr. Smith included objectives based on achieving the Total Revenue, Corporate EPS and the Corporate EBIT goals described above, as well as the following:
supporting the implementation of, and managing practices, procedures and control mechanisms around, the initial phases of an enterprise resource planning system;
assisting internal audit with audit assessments and implementing appropriate changes;
strengthening efficiencies in the finance organization, including reducing redundancies and continuing globalization efforts;
executing initiatives designed to effectively return capital to shareholders; and
developing our human capital and improving workforce diversity.
The fiscal 2012 goals for Mr. Beeder included objectives based on achieving the Total Revenue, Corporate EPS and the Corporate EBIT goals described above, as well as the following:
achieving revenue growth in core accounts and business unit goals, although the Committee retains the discretionsegments;
continuing to decrease the amount of compensation that the Chairman may receive under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. develop and implement product leadership strategies in greeting cards;
investing in profitable creative products categories;
improving sales process to create sustainable marketplace leadership and improve productivity;
developing and exploiting brand differentiation opportunities;
implementing consumer marketing strategies;
expanding into new, and grow existing, distribution opportunities throughout North America;
improving yield, business processes, and merchandising and planning functions;
implementing product and other initiatives with retail customers; and
developing our human capital.
27
The fiscal 20092012 goals for Mr. Goulder included the named executive officers are described above underfollowing:
effectively executing cost reduction in the heading “Base Salaries.”supply chain as well as identifying future cost savings initiatives;
improving productivity while decreasing costs;
partnering with commercial teams to improve efficiency and yield, and grow sales and profitability;
improving service levels, including by manufacturing on time and by improving the retail point of sale fulfillment while minimizing inventory costs;
effectively executing revisions at new and existing retail customers;
driving continuous improvement in product quality, rapid response capabilities, supply chain responsiveness to changing product/format demands and supply chain efficiencies to improve profitability
developing sourcing and manufacturing opportunities, including globalization efforts, print-on-demand capabilities and product procurement opportunities; and
supporting key human resources diversity and inclusion, sustainability and corporate initiatives.
Target Incentive and Calculation of Awards.Awards. The Key Management Annual Incentive Plan target award levels, as a percentage of base salary, for the named executive officers of American Greetings are listed below. We target these incentives at the median ofgenerally expect that our annual cash incentive awards will approximate the market data.median as described above in “Setting Compensation.”
| Target Incentive | |||
| ||||
| ||||
| | 100 | % | |
| 90 | % | ||
| 80 | % | ||
| 80 | % | ||
Stephen J. Smith | 70 | % |
The target incentive level is 80% for Mr. Goulder, 50% for Mr. Morry Weiss, and 70% for Mr. Smith. The target incentive level is higher for Mr. Goulder, as he is classified as a Senior Vice President (Executive Officer) to recognize his contributions as a significant advisor to the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as his significant responsibilities and resulting ability to impact the long-term strategic direction and success of our business.
- 29 -
Under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, an incentive equal to a multiple of the executive officer’s target incentive percentage will be paid depending on the level of performance achieved compared to the performance measures described above. The maximum bonus opportunity is 200% of the target incentive award. To earn this maximum, both the entire corporation and the business unit must achieve at least 125% of their financial goals, and the executive officer must significantly exceed his individual goals. If any of these thresholdslevels is not met, the incentive payable will vary depending on the performance under each performance component. If exactly 100% of each ofUnder the corporateCorporate EPS and business unit performance goals is met, and the officer is determined to have generally met hisCorporate EBIT component, for every 1% increase or her individual performance goals, 100% of the target incentive is earned. However, ifdecrease in the percentage of financialthe goal actually achieved, compared to the goal itself, the target award for eitherthat component will be adjusted up or down by 4% to determine the business unitactual award. Under the Total Revenue component, if revenue performance exceeds 103%, or is less than 97% of, the targeted amount, the target award for the revenue performance measure will be increased or decreased, as applicable, by 5% for each percentage by which we exceed 103%, or fall below 97%, as applicable, of the total revenue goal. While both the EPS and revenue performance measures are evaluated, and incentive awards determined, independently of one another, in no event may the combined award exceed the maximum permitted for the corporate component falls more than 10% belowof 200% of target. In the event at least 90% of the Corporate EPS or Corporate EBIT goal is not achieved, there arewill be no earningspayout under that particular component. If both corporate performance andSimilarly, if at least 95% of the participant’s business unit performanceTotal Revenue goal is not achieved, there will be no payout for the revenue performance measure. In addition, if at least at 90% of the financial goals, no incentive compensationCorporate EPS goal is earned for either the corporate or business unit component, andnot achieved, no incentive is earned for the individual performance component unless the executive officer is determined to have exceeded his individual performance goals. To retain and reward top performers, the plan provides that if the executive officer exceeds his individual performance goals, then notwithstanding the failure to meet corporate and business unitthe Corporate EPS performance goals, one-half ofgoal, the individual performance component of the incentive will be earned. If an executive officer does not meet his individual performance goals and receives the lowest individual performance rating, he will not receive any portion of the individual performance component of the incentive and will only receive 50% of the
Except for
28
incentive compensation earned by the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer, incentiveotherwise earned. Incentive compensation earned by executive officers under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan is paid entirely in cash. To align a portion of the performance-based incentive compensation for Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss more closely with the long-term interests of our shareholders, at the beginning of fiscal 2004,
Awards to Named Executive Officers. In April 2012, the Compensation Committee establishedreviewed actual results for fiscal 2012 with respect to achievement of the Corporate EPS, Total Revenue and Corporate EBIT performance goals. As to the Corporate EPS goal, target EPS was $2.40 per share (or $2.51 per share, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General”), with a multi-year programtarget Total Revenue of $1,669.7 million (or $1,651.7 million, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under which,“General”). Actual EPS and actual revenue results, in each case as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General,” were $2.54 per share and $1,650.0 million, respectively, or approximately 101.3% and 99.9% of target, respectively, resulting in a payout as a percentage of the five fiscal years endingtarget incentive of 105.2% for the combined Corporate EPS and Total Revenue target incentive measures. As to the Corporate EBIT goal, target EBIT was $180.2 million (or $183.0 million, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General”) and actual EBIT results, as adjusted by the factors described above in this section under “General,” was $183.0 million, or approximately 100% of target, resulting in a payout as a percentage of the target incentive of 100% for the Corporate EBIT target incentive.
The Compensation Committee then reviewed the Chief Executive Officer’s assessment of each of Jeffrey Weiss, Stephen Smith, Michael Goulder and John Beeder and each of their respective contributions to our results in fiscal 2008, one-half of any incentive compensation earned by2012. With respect to the Chief Executive Officer, and President and Chief Operating OfficerZev Weiss, the Compensation Committee also considered its own assessment of his performance during fiscal 2012 based on his individual goals described above as well as his contribution to our financial results in fiscal 2012. The individual goals were assessed qualitatively, with no specific weightings given to any criteria. Based on the foregoing, each of the named executive officers were determined to have met his individual performance objectives. As a result of these considerations, the Compensation Committee approved the following payout amounts for the named executive officers under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan will be paid in our Class B common shares. As a result, for upPlan.
| Target Payout as a % of Base Salary(1) | Target Award ($)(1) | Maximum Award ($)(1) | Actual Award ($)(1) | Actual Payout as a % of Base Salary(1) | |||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | 100 | % | $ | 980,740 | $ | 1,961,480 | $ | 996,039 | 102 | % | ||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | 70 | % | $ | 304,730 | $ | 609,460 | $ | 309,484 | 71 | % | ||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | 90 | % | $ | 690,903 | $ | 1,381,806 | $ | 701,681 | 91 | % | ||||||||||
John W. Beeder | 80 | % | $ | 425,501 | $ | 851,002 | $ | 432,139 | 81 | % | ||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | 80 | % | $ | 403,495 | $ | 806,990 | $ | 409,790 | 81 | % |
(1) | Amounts calculated based on base salaries actually paid or earned by the named executive officers during fiscal 2012. |
Awards made to the target incentive award levels that may be earned under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss are each eligible to receive the following amounts: (1) cash in an amount equal to one-half of the incentive compensation earned under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan and (2) up to 34,208 Class B common shares in the case of Mr. Zev Weiss and up to 25,656 Class B common shares in the case of Mr. Jeffrey Weiss. The number of shares actually earned is equal to the percentage of his target incentive award, if any, that he achievesnamed executive officers under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal 2009. If they earn a portion but less than 100% of the shares, they will forfeit the remaining portion of the shares not earned in that year. Under the program, if an incentive is not earned under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan in up to two of the five fiscal years endingperformance in fiscal 2008, the officers have the ability to earn these shares in fiscal 2009 or fiscal 2010. As a result, because Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss did not earn an incentive under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan in fiscal 2004, as part of and to implement the final year of this program, on April 22, 2008, we granted 34,208 performance shares to Mr. Zev Weiss and 25,656 performance shares to Mr. Jeffrey Weiss that could be earned based on fiscal 2009 performance; provided, however, in accordance with the program, if Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss do not earn any performance shares in fiscal 2009 (which, as described below, they did not), they can earn these shares in fiscal 2010 based on the percentage of the target incentive award they achieve under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal 2010.
The maximum number of Class B common shares that can be earned in a fiscal year was determined by dividing the dollar value of one-half of the incentive compensation earned, at their base salaries in effect on March 3, 2003, (not to exceed 100% of the target incentive) by the closing price of our Class A common shares as of March 3, 2003, discounted by one-third, which equates to $8.77 per share. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to base the number of shares received on a discount to the then actual trading price because (a) Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss2012 are not eligible to receive more than the target number of shares even if performance exceeds 100% of the target incentive (thus forfeiting potential compensation upside if performance exceeds 100% of the target incentive) and (b) if the stock price declined further than the price on March 3, 2003, the value of any shares received would be less than the dollar value of one-half of the incentive compensation earned. Under this formula, if we exceed our Corporate EPS and Corporate EBIT performance
- 30 -
goals, Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss are entitled to receive cash in an amount equal to more than one-half of the incentive compensation earned, with the level of earning based on the actual payout levels, based on performance compared to financial goals; however, they only receive the number of performance shares calculated as described above (which is based on achieving 100% of the target incentive).
Awards to Named Officers Generally. For fiscal 2009, American Greetings performed below the 90% threshold of the Corporate EBIT and Corporate EPS goals under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. As a result, in accordance with the plan, none of the named executive officers earned an incentive under either the corporate or business unit performance measure of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan and neither Zev nor Jeffrey Weiss earned any performance shares during fiscal 2009. In addition, as described above under the heading “Base Salaries,” only Mr. Smith was determined to have exceeded his individual performance objectives. As a result, only Mr. Smith received a payout under the individual performance component of the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, which amount is reflected in the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table included in the “Information Concerning Executive Officers” section below.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Our long-term incentive compensation program has historically consisted primarily of stock options. TheseHowever, in April 2009, the Compensation Committee adopted a performance share program under which certain management level employees of the company, including the named executive officers, were granted performance shares targeting key corporate performance objectives over fiscal 2010, fiscal 2011 and potentially fiscal 2012. Although this performance share program was not continued in fiscal 2012 because the corporate performance objectives were achieved in fiscal 2010 and 2011, as described below, beginning in fiscal 2013 the Committee adopted a new performance share program tied to its strategic objectives. In addition, rather than having an equity award program consisting solely of stock options, in April 2010, the Compensation Committee determined to reduce the annual option grant size for its eligible employees, including the named executive officers, and instead granted employees RSUs as well as stock options. Beginning in May 2011, the Compensation Committee determined to eliminate stock options entirely, replacing them with RSUs. Although stock options represent a useful form of incentive compensation, when granting stock options, the company incurs an expense even if the option ultimately has no value to the recipient when the exercise price remains higher than the market price of our stock. Accordingly, to ensure that the costs to the company of equity awards
29
are aligned with the objective of providing an incentive to its officers, yet maintaining an alignment of interests between the shareholders and management (including the named executive officers), beginning in May 2011, rather than including both stock options and RSUs in the annual equity grant, the Compensation Committee determined to grant only RSUs. The number of performance shares and RSUs granted is based on the participant’s position in the company and, with respect to RSUs, his or her individual performance in the prior fiscal year.
Equity awards are consistent with our pay for performancepay-for-performance principles because stock options: they:
align the interests of executives with those of the shareholders;
foster employee stock ownership;
reflect the market’s assessment of our level of goal achievement; and
focus the management team on increasing value for the shareholders. In addition,
We have historically used stock options, are inherentlyand continue to use performance based in that all the value received by the recipient from a stock option is based on the growth of the stock price above the option price. We also use stock optionsshares and RSUs, as our long-term incentive vehicle because we believe that stock options helpthe use of multiple forms of compensation helps to provide a balance between long-term and short-term awards in our total compensation package. The Key Management Annual Incentive Plan focuses on the achievement of annual performance targets, while the two yearmulti-year vesting for stock options (and three years for the Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer)our equity awards creates incentive for increases inincentives to increase shareholder value over a longer term. Finally, we believe that the vesting periodterm and encourages ongoing executive retention and the preservation of shareholder value. While the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan allows for other forms of equity compensation, the Compensation Committee and management believe that stock options as the primary vehicle to provide long-term incentive compensation to our executive officers is appropriate. However, as described below under “Performance Shares,” subject to shareholder approval of the amendment to the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan contemplated by Proposal Two, on April 17, 2009 the Committee approved a performance share award program. In addition, other types of long-term equity incentive compensation may be considered in the future as our business strategy evolves. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the amount of each award to be granted to each executive officer.retention.
Stock OptionsRSUs
Grant Terms.Terms. Stock option awards provide our executive officers with the right to purchase our common shares at a fixed exercise price for a period of up to ten years. Stock optionsRSUs are earned on the basis of continued service to usus. To align their interests with those of our shareholders, grants to our named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and generallythe President and Chief Operating Officer vest in approximately equal increments over two years following the date of grant. To further align their interests with those of our shareholders, options grantedgrant and grants to our Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer vest in approximately equal increments over three years following the date of grant. In addition, to align their interests with those of our shareholders, from time to time we grant our executive officers options with vesting provisions that accelerate if our share price reaches specified levels. Please refer to the section below entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a discussion of the change in control provisions related to stock options. Historically, all of the options we have granted have included option reload rights. Option reload rights provide for the automatic grant of additional stock options upon the exercise of stock options using then-owned common shares or other awards. Option reload rights were provided as a means to provide an additional opportunity for our executives to increase their equity ownership in American Greetings. Commencing with grants made in fiscal 2008, we discontinued granting options with reload
- 31 -
rights. In addition, the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan approved by our shareholders at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders prohibits the provision of reload rights.
Grant Timing.Timing. Our named executive officers and other executive officers receive an initial grant of stock options when joining the company or when being promoted into a position eligible for such grants. Thereafter, our executive officers and other employees are eligible to receive annual awards of stock optionsRSUs annually as well as awards in connection with promotions to higher level positions. During fiscal 2009, the exercise price of each stock option granted was based on the fair market value of our common shares on the grant date. The Compensation Committee adoptedapplies a stock option grant policy designed to ensure that stock optionsRSUs are granted at such times after we have publicly releasedrelease our quarterly or annual financial information. Under the policy, the date of grant for annual stock optionRSU awards will beis the second trading day (a day that the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE is open for trading) following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The date of grant for an individual newly hired or promoted into an eligible position is based on the month of hire or promotion, and is either granted with the annual stock optionRSU grant or on the second trading day following a quarterly earnings release.
Generally, we do not consider an executive officer’s stock holdings or previous stock optionequity grants in determining the number of stock optionsequity awards to be granted.grant. We believe that our executive officers should be fairly compensated each year relative to market pay levels of our peer group and relative to our other executive officers. Moreover, we believe that our long-term incentive compensation program furthers our significant emphasis on pay for performancepay-for-performance compensation. We do not have any requirement that executive officers hold a specific amount of our common shares or stock options.
While We do, however, prohibit transactions by our directors, officers and employees in puts, calls, hedges and other derivatives relating to American Greetings securities, including, without limitation, financial instruments, such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds, that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the majoritymarket value of stock option awards to our executive officers have been made pursuant to our annual grant program or in connection with their hiring or promotion, the Compensation Committee retains discretion to make stock option awards to executive officers at other times, including to reward executive officers for exceptional performance, for retention purposes or for other circumstances recommended by management to the Compensation Committee. The exercise pricesecurities of any such grant is the closing price of our common shares on the grant date.American Greetings.
Grants to the Named Executive Officers.Officers. Like our other pay components, long-term equity incentive award grants are determined based on an analysisgenerally expected to approximate the market median as described above in “Setting Compensation.” With respect to grants made during fiscal 2012, the size of competitive market levels. Thethe RSU grant was a fixed, targeted number of options granted dependsshares based upon the level of the executive officer’s position, with the actual grant size then being adjusted depending on the level of individual performance achieved by the executive in the prior fiscal year. However, because the value of the RSU grant both to the recipient and for purposes of calculating the expense recorded by the company could vary greatly depending on the trading price of our stock on the date of grant, beginning with grants made in
30
May 2012 (fiscal 2013), the size of the RSU grant is based on a fixed dollar value of shares, where the dollar value is based upon the level of the executive officer’s position. For annual grants, this dollar value of the grant size is in turn adjusted depending on the level of individual performance achieved by the executive, based on the executive’s achievement of individual goals and objectives in the fiscal year preceding the grant. As a result, the actual number of RSUs granted will vary in size depending not only on the executive officer’s level and performance in the prior fiscal year. Senior Vice Presidents, includingyear, but also based on the named executive officers who are Senior Vice Presidents, annually receive a target amountclosing price of options to purchase an aggregate of 22,000 Class Aour common shares or 35,000on the date of grant. The annual target grant sizes are as follows:
Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Name | Target Annual Grant (#) | Actual Annual Grant (#) | Target and Actual Annual Grant ($) | Actual Annual Grant (#) | ||||||||||||
Zev Weiss(1) | 25,000 | 28,750 | $ | 600,000 | 37,902 | |||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss(1) | 18,800 | 21,620 | $ | 450,000 | 28,428 | |||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith(2) | 5,500 | 5,500 | $ | 130,000 | 8,212 | |||||||||||
John W. Beeder(2) | 8,800 | 11,000 | $ | 210,000 | 13,266 | |||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder(2) | 8,800 | 8,800 | $ | 210,000 | 13,266 |
(1) | Equity grants in the form of Class B common shares |
(2) | Equity grants in the form of Class A common shares |
The fiscal 2012 target grant sizes set forth above were set at a level intended to maintain the aggregate accounting cost for the equity awards incurred by the company at approximately the same level as incurred when our long-term incentive program consisted solely of stock options. The dollar value of the fiscal 2013 target grant sizes set forth above was set at a level intended to approximate the aggregate target value of the RSU grants made during fiscal 2012 based on the closing price of our common shares depending on their levelthat date of responsibility. These actualgrant, May 3, 2011, which was $23.72 per share. The target grant sizes reflected in the table above may be increased or decreased based on individual performance. An executive, including aperformance in the prior fiscal year. A named executive officer who has not achieved his or her individual performance goals is eligible for aan equity grant of stock options ranging from 0% to 100% of the target grant size for his or her position for that fiscal year. AnA named executive other than the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer,officer who is determined to have exceeded his or her individual performance goals is eligible for aan equity grant of stock options of either 115% or 125% of the target grant size for his or her position. The Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer are not eligible to receive a stock option grant at more than 100% of the target grant size for their respective positions, regardless of their exceeding any individual performance goals.
The target option grant level for Messrs. Goulder and Smith is 35,000 and 22,000 Class A common shares, respectively. The annual target option grant amount for the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer and Chairman is set at options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000, 75,000 and 18,000 Class B common shares, respectively.
The Compensation Committee set the target grant size for certain of its Senior Vice Presidents in December 2003 at options to purchase 22,000 Class A common shares. With the assistance of Mercer, the Compensation
- 32 -
Committee determined that this grant size was appropriate based on the median value of options granted to comparable positions in the marketplace, consistent with our philosophy of targeting compensation at the median of the competitive data. Classified as a Senior Vice President (Executive Officer), the target grant size for Mr. Goulder was set at options to purchase 35,000 Class A common shares to recognize his contributions as a significant advisor to the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as his significant responsibilities and resulting ability to impact the long-term strategic direction and success of our business. With respect to the options granted to our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Chairman, the target grant size was set in connection with their appointments to their current positions in 2003. As described above under “Base Salaries – Named Executive Officers,” in fiscal 2007 the Committee evaluated whether Mr. Morry Weiss’s compensation should be changed and determined that his target stock option grant level should remain fixed at 18,000 Class B common shares, although the Committee retains discretion to lower the amount.
The optionsRSUs granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 20092012 that are reflected above were granted in May 20082011 and are reflected in the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation and the Fiscal 2012 Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableTables in the “Information“Fiscal 2012 Information Concerning Executive Officers” section below. The size of the award was based on the officer’s target grant size and his individual performance during fiscal 2008. The May 20082011. As described above under “Base Salaries,” the grant sizesizes to Mr.Messrs. Smith wasand Goulder were based on Mr. Smitheach of them meeting his individual performance goals for fiscal 2008,2011. The grant sizes for Messrs. Zev and the grant size to Mr. Goulder wasJeffrey Weiss were based on Mr. Goulder meeting oreach of them exceeding his individual performance goals for fiscal 2008. Each of Messrs. Morry, Zev,2011 and Jeffrey Weiss’sthe grant size to Mr. Beeder was at the target grant level described above.based on him significantly exceeding his individual performance goals for fiscal 2011.
The annual optionRSU grants to our named executive officers based on fiscal 20092012 performance were made on May 1, 2009. Messrs. Morry, Zev and Jeffrey Weiss were granted options to purchase 18,000, 100,000, and 75,000 Class B common shares, respectively, and Messrs. Smith and Goulder were granted options to purchase 25,300 and 35,000 Class A common shares.2, 2012, which is in our fiscal 2013. The size of the grants was based on each individual’s target annual stock optionRSU grant size, the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant and his individualeach individual’s performance rating, based on the officer’s individual performance assessment described above under the heading “Base Salaries.“Key Management Annual Incentive Plan – Awards to Named Executive Officers.” Because the optionsRSUs granted to each of the named executive officers were granted in fiscal 2010,2013, they are not reflected in the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation or the Fiscal 2012 Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableTables in the “Fiscal 2012 Information Concerning Executive Officers” section below.
Performance Shares
As described aboveWith the achievement in fiscal 2010 and 2011 of the goals established for the performance share program that was implemented in April 2009, no performance share grants were made to the named executive officers in fiscal 2012. In April 2012, however, the Compensation Committee approved a new performance share award
31
program under “Key Management Annual Incentive Plan,” we have also grantedwhich each year, beginning in fiscal 2013, executive officers, including the named executive officers, will be eligible to receive grants of performance shares under the American Greetings 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan that can be earned based on the achievement of long-term performance goals established by the Compensation Committee from time to time. The program is designed to reward participants for successfully executing key strategic, operational and business objectives that are intended to produce exceptional long-term performance and create significant value for our Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, which generally provide that they will receive a portion of their incentive undershareholders. The performance share program, like the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, inis intended to drive operational performance while also driving shareholder value creation, thereby better aligning the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. Performance share grants, if made, will entitle the recipient to receive common shares rather than cash.In addition, subject to shareholder approvalbased on the achievement of such performance goals as may be established by the amendment toCompensation Committee at the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan contemplated by Proposal Two, on April 17, 2009, the Committee approved atime of grant. No performance share award program. The program, which entitles participants (includinggrants have been made to the named executive officers)officers under this program prior to earn shares during the next two to three fiscal years based on American Greetings’ long-term performance, is described in Proposal Two under “New Omnibus Incentive Plan Benefits.”date of this Proxy Statement.
Benefits
To offer competitive compensation packages, during fiscal 2012, we provideprovided our executive officers a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, a Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, and an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Effective January 1, 2012, we froze the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and determined to no longer provide the maximizer benefit and restoration benefit described below.
The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is designed to provide benefits that are competitive with those offered by other comparable companies, while requiring a meaningful tenure as an officer before becoming eligible to receive benefits. Although all of our employees meeting the requisite service requirements are entitled to participate in the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, for officers at the Vice President level and above, which includes all of the named executive officers, during fiscal 2012, we offeroffered a benefit that permitspermitted those officers to contribute more than the statutory maximum ($15,50016,500 for 2008)2011) under the 401(k) savings component of the plan, and receive a corresponding match (the “maximizer benefit”) on the additional contributions (40% of the first 6% of eligible compensation deferred). Similarly, for our executives at the Vice President level and above, which includes our named executive officers, during fiscal 2012, we offer a benefit under which participants in the profit sharing component of the plan will
- 33 -
receive an additional profit sharing contribution (the “restoration benefit”) based on a portion of the executive’s base salary that exceeds the statutory compensation limits.limit. Both of these benefits arewere intended to enable officers to take full advantage of the ability to earn profit sharing contributions toward the executive’s retirement, and to save on a tax deferred basis and receive matching contributions, notwithstanding the limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code on compensation that can be taken into account for purposes of determining contributions to a qualified retirement plan, such as our Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. DueAs reflected in note 6 to the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table as well as in note 1 to the Fiscal 2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table below, based on the company’s financial performance in fiscal 2009,2012, during fiscal 2013, we did not make amade profit sharing contribution or aand matching contribution forcontributions to our employees, together with the associated maximizer and restoration benefit, to the named executive officers.
Until January 1, 2012, executive officers, including the named executive officers, under the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan.
Officers at the Vice President level and above arewere also eligible to participate in our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, where officers arewere entitled to defer compensation on a tax deferred basis. The cost of the benefit provided under the deferred compensation program iswas de minimis. Consequently, we generally dohave not considerconsidered the value of the deferred compensation program in calculating the total compensation provided to our named executive officers. These plans are described in more detail in the narrative accompanying the disclosure tables in the “Information“Fiscal 2012 Information Concerning Executive Officers” section below. In an effort to eliminate compensation programs offered by the company that are not widely utilized, yet are administratively burdensome to operate, on December 8, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined to freeze the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Accordingly, participants are no longer permitted to make new deferral elections under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferral elections made prior to December 8, 2011, however, will continue to be honored, and amounts previously deferred will remain deferred in accordance with existing deferral elections and may be re-deferred in accordance with the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. In addition, executive officers were eligible to receive and did in fact
32
receive amounts contributed by the company as additional matching and profit sharing contributions under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan’s maximizer and restoration benefits based on our performance in the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012. The maximizer and restoration benefit, however, will not be provided for future years.
Our executive officers also participate in other benefit plans provided by American Greetings, including medical, dental and life insurance. Except as described below under “Perquisites and Other Benefits,” their participation is generally on the same terms as that of other employees.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
We provide our executive officers with certain personal benefits and perquisites. The value of personal benefits and perquisites, and the related incremental cost to American Greetings, has historically not been de minimis.significant. The primary personal benefits and perquisites for our executive officers are:
Company provided car – for both business and personal use, where we also pay the operating costs, including maintenance and insurance.
Company products – allowing executive officers to purchase certain company products from our company store for personal use at no cost (all non-officer employees may purchase company products at a significant discount from the retail cost).
Executive life insurance – providing the executive officers with a universal life insurance policy of three times their annual base salary, and reimbursing them for the payment of taxes on income attributed to the executive for the value of universal life insurance premiums paid by us. Upon termination of employment, each officer may assume his or her insurance policy, including premium payment obligations, in which case such officer will be entitled to any cash surrender value attributable to the policy.
Accidental death and dismemberment insurance – providing each executive officer with a supplemental accidental death and dismemberment policy of the lesser of (1) three times his or her annual salary or (2) $3 million subject to a minimum of $250,000 for the officer, and in certain instances, $75,000 for the officer’s spouse and $25,000 for each of the officer’s dependent children.
Personal liability policy – providing a personal liability policy ranging from $3 million to $5 million for catastrophic coverage in excess of the officer’s personal coverage.
In addition to the personal benefits and perquisites described above, we also pay the membership dues for our Chairman’s membership in a local business dining club. In connection with hiring new executive officers who must be relocated, we provide financial assistance associated with such relocation, including paying for moving expenses as well as for the executive officer’s temporary housing. During fiscal 2009, none of the named executive officers received any such financial assistance. We periodically review the perquisites that our executive officers receive. In connection with this review, during fiscal 2009, we eliminated the personal liability policy described above.
• | Company-provided car – for both business and personal use, where we also pay the operating costs, including maintenance and insurance. In an effort to eliminate some of the costs and administrative burdens of administering the executive car program, beginning on the later of January 1, 2012 and the date that the executive’s company car lease expires, rather than providing a company car, executive officers will be provided an annual car allowance intended to be used for, and to cover the operating costs of, a vehicle. |
• | Company products – providing executive officers with free company products from our company store for personal use (all non-officer employees may purchase company products at a significant discount from the retail cost). |
- 34 -
• | Executive life insurance – providing the executive officers with a universal life insurance policy of three times their annual base salary, and reimbursing them for the payment of taxes on income attributed to the executive for the value of universal life insurance premiums paid by us. Upon termination of employment, each officer may assume his or her insurance policy, including premium payment obligations, in which case such officer will be entitled to any cash surrender value attributable to the policy, which has historically been de minimis. |
• | Accidental death and dismemberment insurance – providing each executive officer with a supplemental accidental death and dismemberment policy in an amount equal to $275,000 and, in certain instances, $75,000 for the officer’s spouse and $25,000 for each of the officer’s dependent children. |
As part of Mr. Morry Weiss’s overall compensation package, American Greetings and the Morry Weiss and Judith S. Weiss 2001 Irrevocable Insurance Trust (the “Trust”) entered into a split dollar life insurance agreement the subject of which was an insurance policy that provided total death benefits of $30 million upon the death of Mr. Morry Weiss, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of American Greetings, and his wife (whichever occurred later), the indirect beneficiaries of which were their children. Under the split dollar life insurance agreement, American Greetings paid a portion of the premium costs of the policy and had a collateral interest in the policy as security for reimbursement of an amount equal to the premiums paid by American Greetings. However, the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) brought into question whether American Greetings could continue to pay premiums and increase the reimbursement amount with respect to the insurance policy. The Act prohibits new loans between American Greetings and certain individuals, and certain features of the continuing split dollar life insurance arrangement could be characterized as a loan prohibited by the Act. American Greetings did not make premium payments since the enactment of the Act and any additional amount paid with respect to the policy since enactment of the Act were not subject to reimbursement by American Greetings. As a result of the potential limitations imposed by the Act on the continuation of the split dollar life insurance agreement, the split dollar life insurance agreement was terminated on February 16, 2009. In connection with its termination, the Trust paid American Greetings $1,190,913, representing the cash surrender value of the policy.
After receiving legal advice from independent counsel that Mr. Weiss could have contractual claims against the company for early termination of the split dollar life insurance agreement, the Compensation Committee determined it was in the best interests of the company to resolve such claims promptly. When calculating the economic loss Mr. Weiss would suffer as a result of the early termination of the split dollar life insurance agreement, the Compensation Committee took into account a number of factors, including the cost of Mr. Weiss obtaining a comparable life insurance policy, the tax consequences of receiving additional compensation from the company, and the impact of the termination of the split dollar life insurance program on Mr. Weiss’s overall compensation package. After reviewing the entire matter, to compensate Mr. Weiss for relinquishing his rights to the split dollar insurance benefits and to otherwise release the obligations owed by American Greetings to Mr. Morry Weiss under the split dollar life insurance agreement, the Compensation Committee approved paying Mr. Weiss installments of $2,324,155 and $1,178,166, which were paid on February 16, 2009 and April 15, 2009, respectively, and a payment of $1,178,080, which is due on March 6, 2010. The April 15 payment was, and the March 6, 2010 payment is, contingent upon American Greetings’ leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio being within the levels permitted under its Credit Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2006, as amended. If American Greetings was not within the levels as of the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately prior to the April payment date, the amount to be paid on that date would have been payable on the March 6, 2010 payment date. If American Greetings is not within these levels as of February 28, 2010, that payment will be forfeited.
• | Business travel accident insurance – providing each executive officer with a business travel accident policy of the lesser of (1) three times his or her annual salary and (2) $3 million subject to a minimum of $250,000 for the officer and, in certain instances, $75,000 for the officer’s spouse and $25,000 for each of the officer’s dependent children. |
Severance and Change in Control Agreements
We do not offer separate change in control agreements for our officers. However, Mr.each of Messrs. Beeder and Goulder has provisions in his employment agreement that provide for certain compensation and other benefits if he separates employment upon or following a change in control. In addition, when we retained Mr. Smith as our Vice President and Treasurer in April 2003, we agreed to provide him certain severance benefits if terminated by us without cause. We also have a general severance policy under which executive officers are entitled to severance benefits if they are terminated involuntarily. To encourage their retention until completion of, and to reduce distractions associated with, a change in control, and because of the increased risk that they will have to rely on the decisions and management of the acquiring company to earn the benefit to which they were granted following a change in control, any unvested performance shares granted to each of our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer vest and are deemed fully earned upon a change in control. These arrangements for our named executive officers are described in more detail in the section below entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
- 35 -
To attract the highest caliber of officers, from time to time, we have found it necessary to offer severance arrangements that compensate our officers upon a change in control or their termination by us for reasons other than cause. Additionally, when offering arrangements entitling our officers to compensation upon separation following a change in control, we have considered the nature of the position, the need to fill the position and the
33
ability to attract the senior executive officer. These severance arrangements following a change in control have been structured with a “double trigger,” meaning the severance is only paid if (1) we undergo a transaction that is deemed a change in control and (2) the officer is terminated or constructively terminated. We believe this double trigger requirement maximizes shareholder value because it ensures the officer does not receive an unintended windfall by receiving a severance payment while maintaining his salaried position. We believe these arrangements are reasonable means to protect themthe officers in the event of a change in control and align their interests with those of our shareholders in thatbecause providing change in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of senior management to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of shareholders. Relative to the overall value of American Greetings, we believe that these potential change in control and severance benefits are minor.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Limitations on deductibility of compensation may occur under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which generally limits the tax deductibility of compensation paid by a public company to its Chief Executive Officer and certain other highly compensated executive officers to $1 million in the year the compensation becomes taxable to the executive officer. There is an exception to the limit on deductibility for performance-based compensation that meets certain requirements.
Although tax deductibility of compensation is preferred, tax deductibilityit is not a primary objective of our compensation programs. We believe that achieving our compensation objectives set forth above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility, and we reserve the right to maintain flexibility in how we compensate our executive officers that may result in limiting the deductibility of amounts of compensation from time to time.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation and Management Development Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in American Greetings’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009.29, 2012.
The Compensation and Management
Development Committee
Scott S. Cowen (Chairman) | ||
Charles A. Ratner | ||
Jeffrey D. Dunn | Jerry Sue Thornton |
Except for the American Greetings’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 200929, 2012 or as expressly set forth by specific reference in any future filing, the foregoing Report of the Compensation and Management Development Committee shall not be incorporated by reference into any previous or future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
- 36 -
RISKS RELATED TO COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES
In April 2012, we conducted a risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices for our employees, including those relating to our executive compensation programs. Mercer, the Compensation Committee’s outside consultant, assisted us in conducting the assessment. Our risk assessment included a detailed qualitative and quantitative analysis of our compensation and benefit programs to which employees at all levels of the organization may participate, including our executive officers. We also considered how our compensation programs compare, from a design perspective, to compensation programs maintained by other companies. Based on our assessment, we believe that our compensation and benefit programs have been appropriately designed to attract and retain talent and properly incent employees. Although our programs are generally designed to pay-for-performance and provide incentive-based compensation, the programs contain various mitigating factors to ensure our employees, including our named executive officers, are not encouraged to take unnecessary risks in managing our business. These factors include:
Oversight of programs (or components of programs) by committees of the Board, including the Compensation Committee;
Discretion provided to the Board and the Compensation Committee (including negative discretion) to set targets, monitor performance and determine final payouts;
Oversight of programs (or components of programs) by a broad-based group of functions within the organization, including Human Resources, Finance, Audit and Legal and at multiple levels within the organization (both corporate and business unit/region);
A mixture of programs that provide focus on both short- and long-term goals and that provide a mixture of cash and equity compensation;
Customary caps on the maximum payouts available under certain programs, including the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan;
Incentives focused primarily on the use of reportable and broad-based financial metrics (such as EBIT, Total Revenue and EPS), including a mixture of consolidated and business-specific goals, with no one factor receiving an excessive weighting;
Service-based vesting conditions with respect to equity grants; and
The significant long-term ownership interests in the company held by certain of our key executive officers.
We discussed the findings of our risk assessment with the Compensation Committee. We believe that our compensation policies and practices do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on American Greetings.
35
FISCAL 2012 INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Summary Compensation
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each offor the named executive officers for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.29, 2012 (and prior fiscal years, as applicable). Amounts listed under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column below were determined by the Compensation Committee at its April 20092012 meeting and, to the extent not deferred by the executive, were paid out shortly thereafter.
Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) (1) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Option Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(5) | All Other Compensation ($)(6) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | 2009 | $ | 916,986 | — | — | $ | 442,924 | — | $ | 67,380 | $ | 36,518 | $ | 1,463,808 | |||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2008 | $ | 882,183 | — | $ | 779,543 | $ | 504,382 | $ | 600,414 | $ | 4,918 | $ | 57,758 | $ | 2,829,198 | |||||||||||
2007 | $ | 790,000 | — | $ | 709,626 | $ | 678,974 | $ | 518,082 | $ | 85,145 | $ | 46,456 | $ | 2,828,283 | ||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | 2009 | $ | 381,334 | — | — | $ | 92,045 | $ | 26,693 | $ | 27,609 | $ | 24,569 | $ | 552,251 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2008 | $ | 352,084 | — | — | $ | 112,189 | $ | 335,479 | $ | 13,960 | $ | 36,097 | $ | 849,808 | ||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2007 | $ | 248,208 | — | — | $ | 52,458 | $ | 205,811 | (7) | $ | 14,304 | $ | 29,082 | $ | 549,863 | |||||||||||
Morry Weiss (8) | 2009 | $ | 400,000 | — | — | $ | 66,039 | — | — | $ | 2,420,184 | (9) | $ | 2,886,223 | |||||||||||||
Chairman of the Board | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | 2009 | $ | 717,767 | — | — | $ | 312,690 | — | $ | 30,662 | $ | 30,352 | $ | 1,091,472 | |||||||||||||
President and Chief | 2008 | $ | 693,550 | — | $ | 584,657 | $ | 401,158 | $ | 424,827 | — | $ | 49,519 | $ | 2,153,711 | ||||||||||||
Operating Officer | 2007 | $ | 638,750 | — | $ | 532,220 | $ | 488,516 | $ | 377,003 | $ | 90,656 | $ | 44,323 | $ | 2,171,468 | |||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | 2009 | $ | 473,943 | — | — | $ | 159,743 | — | $ | 30,662 | $ | 26,247 | $ | 690,595 | |||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2008 | $ | 451,375 | — | — | $ | 189,707 | $ | 599,859 | $ | 19,020 | $ | 52,066 | $ | 1,312,026 | ||||||||||||
Executive Supply Chain | 2007 | $ | 429,880 | — | — | $ | 296,338 | $ | 519,846 | $ | 34,221 | $ | 37,323 | $ | 1,317,609 | ||||||||||||
Officer |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Option Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(5) | All Other Compensation ($)(6) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss Chief Executive Officer | 2012 2011 2010 | $ $ $ | 980,740 944,495 921,460 | $ $ $ | 648,543 368,769 674,302 | $ $ | — 630,278 233,126 | $ $ $ | 996,039 1,716,715 921,459 | $ $ $ | 544,215 125,212 449,453 | $ $ $ | 60,135 96,240 71,183 | $ $ $ | 3,229,672 3,881,709 3,270,983 | |||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2012 2011 2010 | $ $ $ | 435,329 418,276 386,101 | $ $ $ | 125,627 76,853 260,310 | $ $ | — 133,803 64,086 | $ $ $ | 309,484 502,902 513,514 | $ $ $ | 125,156 43,009 85,503 | $ $ $ | 52,834 51,823 52,870 | $ $ $ | 1,048,430 1,226,666 1,362,384 | |||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss President and Chief Operating Officer | 2012 2011 2010 | $ $ $ | 767,670 739,300 721,268 | $ $ $ | 487,705 277,315 563,572 | $ $ | — 472,709 174,845 | $ $ $ | 701,681 1,209,376 649,141 | $ $ $ | 388,822 65,681 382,573 | $ $ $ | 58,483 57,183 60,947 | $ $ $ | 2,404,361 2,821,564 2,552,346 | |||||||||||||||||
John W. Beeder Senior Vice President Executive Sales and Marketing Officer | 2012 2011 2010 | $ $ $ | 531,876 483,334 440,000 | $ $ $ | 251,254 131,270 347,081 | $ $ | — 231,377 88,657 | $ $ $ | 432,139 741,473 704,000 | $ $ $ | 116,929 71,798 22,323 | $ $ $ | 52,051 89,821 125,692 | $ $ $ | 1,384,249 1,749,073 1,727,753 | |||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder Senior Vice President Executive Supply Chain Officer | 2012 2011 2010 | $ $ $ | 504,369 489,678 477,735 | $ $ $ | 201,003 105,016 347,081 | $ $ | — 185,103 88,657 | $ $ $ | 409,790 672,857 687,938 | $ $ $ | 159,615 60,371 119,115 | $ $ $ | 42,068 49,490 45,595 | $ $ $ | 1,316,845 1,562,515 1,766,120 |
(1) | The amounts included in this column for fiscal 2012 reflect the base salaries actually paid to or earned by the named executive |
(2) | The amounts for fiscal 2012 reflect the |
(3) |
- 37 -
(4) | The amounts in this column for fiscal 2012 reflect the cash awards to the named individuals under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan, which is discussed in further detail in |
(5) | The amounts in this column for fiscal 2012 reflect the actuarial change in the present value of the named executive officer’s benefits under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan during the respective fiscal year. |
(6) | The following table describes each |
Name | Tax Payments (a) | Matching and Profit Sharing Contributions (b) | Maximizer and Restoration Benefits (c) | Value of Life Insurance Premiums (d) | Other Benefits (e) | Tax Payments (a) | Matching and Profit Sharing Contributions (b) | Maximizer and Restoration Benefits (c) | Value of Life Insurance Premiums (d) | Other Benefits (e) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | $ | 11,181 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 12,655 | $ | 12,682 | $ | 5,350 | $ | 13,583 | $ | 3,856 | $ | 11,137 | $ | 26,208 | |||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | $ | 6,087 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,342 | $ | 11,140 | $ | 3,821 | $ | 13,583 | $ | 10,856 | $ | 7,955 | $ | 16,618 | |||||||||||||||
Morry Weiss | $ | 31,997 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 41,940 | $ | 2,346,247 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | $ | 9,531 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 11,675 | $ | 9,146 | $ | 4,577 | $ | 13,583 | $ | 16,218 | $ | 9,528 | $ | 14,577 | |||||||||||||||
John W. Beeder | $ | 3,739 | $ | 13,583 | $ | 12,658 | $ | 7,784 | $ | 14,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | $ | 7,103 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 9,659 | $ | 4,172 | $ | 13,583 | $ | 3,856 | $ | 8,684 | $ | 11,773 |
(a) | Reflects amounts reimbursed for the payment of taxes on income attributed to the officer for the value of universal life insurance premiums paid by American Greetings. |
(b) | This column reports (i) company matching contributions with respect to fiscal |
(c) | This column reports the maximizer and restoration benefits contributed by us with respect to fiscal |
(d) | This column represents premiums paid by American Greetings with respect to universal life insurance |
(e) | This column includes the aggregate incremental cost to American Greetings of the following perquisites or benefits for each named executive officer during |
|
- 38 -
|
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20092012
The table below provides the following information about equity and non-equity awards granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 2009:2012: (1) the grant date; (2) the date the grant was approved by our Compensation Committee; (3) the estimated futurepossible payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards, which consist of potential payouts under our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan for the fiscal 20092012 performance period; (4) the estimated future payouts under equity incentive planall other stock awards, which consist of potential payouts under performance share awards; (5) all other option awards, which consist of the number of shares underlyingtime-based restricted stock optionsunits awarded to the named executive officers; (6) the exercise price of the stock option awards, which reflects the closing price of American Greetings’ stock on the date of grant; and (7)(5) the grant date fair value of each equity award computed under SFAS 123(R).Topic 718.
Fiscal 2012 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
Name | Grant Date | Approval Date (1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) (4) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (4) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | 4/22/08 | 4/22/08 | 3,420 | 34,208 | 34,208 | $ | 628,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
N/A | — | $ | 45,849 | $ | 458,493 | $ | 916,986 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/08 | 4/22/08 | 100,000 | $ | 18.12 | $ | 324,555 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | N/A | — | $ | 26,693 | $ | 266,934 | $ | 533,868 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/08 | 4/22/08 | 22,000 | $ | 18.12 | $ | 69,002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Morry Weiss | N/A | — | N/A | $ | 200,000 | $ | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/08 | 4/22/08 | 18,000 | $ | 18.12 | $ | 56,456 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | 4/22/08 | 4/22/08 | 2,566 | 25,656 | 25,656 | $ | 471,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NA | — | $ | 32,299 | $ | 332,995 | $ | 645,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/08 | 4/22/08 | 75,000 | $ | 18.12 | $ | 243,413 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | N/A | — | $ | 37,915 | $ | 379,155 | $ | 758,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/08 | 4/22/08 | 43,750 | $ | 18.12 | $ | 137,220 |
- 39 -
Name | Grant Date | Approval Date(1) | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | — | — | $ | 294,222 | $ | 980,740 | $ | 1,961,480 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2011 | 4/14/2011 | — | — | — | 28,750 | $ | 648,543 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | — | — | $ | 91,419 | $ | 304,730 | $ | 609,460 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2011 | 4/14/2011 | — | — | — | 5,500 | $ | 125,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | — | — | $ | 207,271 | $ | 690,903 | $ | 1,381,806 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2011 | 4/14/2011 | — | — | — | 21,620 | $ | 487,705 | |||||||||||||||||||||
John W. Beeder | — | — | $ | 127,650 | $ | 425,501 | $ | 851,002 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2011 | 4/14/2011 | — | — | — | 11,000 | $ | 251,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | — | — | $ | 121,049 | $ | 403,495 | $ | 806,990 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2011 | 4/14/2011 | — | — | — | 8,800 | $ | 201,003 |
(1) | Reflects the date on which the |
(2) | These columns show the potential value of the payout for each named executive officer under our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan at threshold, target and maximum levels. The award levels are based on a percentage of the individual’s actual base salary earned during fiscal |
(3) |
The amounts in this column reflect the annual |
38
- 40 -
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, except Mr. Morry Weiss.officers. In addition to the matters described below, each of these agreements provide for certain compensation to be paid to the named executive officer following the termination of his employment under certain circumstances. A description of these provisions is contained in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section below.
Mr. Zev Weiss’s employment agreement, dated May 1, 1997, provides for an annual base salary of not less than $70,716 plus additional compensation as the Board, of Directors, Executive Committee or the ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee may determine. Mr. Zev Weiss’s base salary as of February 28, 200929, 2012 was $921,459.$987,067. Mr. Stephen Smith’s employment agreement, dated August 14, 2003, provides for an annual base salary of not less than $175,000 plus additional compensation as the Board, of Directors, Executive Committee or the ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee may determine. Mr. Smith’s base salary as of February 28, 200929, 2012 was $386,100.$437,453. Mr. Jeffrey Weiss’s employment agreement, dated June 1, 1991, provides for an annual base salary of not less than $70,000 plus additional compensation as the Board, of Directors, Executive Committee or the ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee may determine. Mr. Jeffrey Weiss’s base salary as of February 28, 200929, 2012 was $721,268. $772,622.
Mr. John Beeder’s employment agreement, dated June 12, 2008, provides for an annual base salary of at least $440,000, which salary may be increased based on Mr. Beeder’s performance. Mr. Beeder’s base salary as of February 29, 2012 was $562,900. During his employment, he is entitled to participate in our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan at the Senior Vice President level, our equity grant plans at the Senior Vice President level, our flexible benefits program, and the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Mr. Beeder is also entitled to receive certain other benefits normally provided to other Senior Vice Presidents, including use of a company car.
Mr. Michael Goulder’s employment agreement, dated October 17, 2002, provides for an annual base salary of at least $330,000, which salary may be increased based on Mr. Goulder’s performance. Mr. Goulder’s base salary as of February 29, 2012 was $506,829. During his employment, he is entitled to participate in our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan at the Senior Vice President level, our equity grant plans at the Senior Vice President level, our flexible benefits program, and the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Mr. Goulder is eligible to receive certain other benefits normally provided to other Senior Vice Presidents, including use of a company car.
Under the terms of their agreements, each of Messrs. Zev andWeiss, Jeffrey Weiss, Smith, Beeder and Mr. SmithGoulder agreed, after leaving American Greetings for any reason, that he will not work, directly or indirectly, for any of our competitors in the United States or Canada for a period of twelve months. The agreements also contain customary confidentiality provisions.
Mr. Michael Goulder’s agreement, dated October 17, 2002, provides for an annual base salary of at least $330,000, which salary may be increased based on Mr. Goulder’s performance. Mr. Goulder’s base salary as of February 28, 2009 was $477,735. During his employment, he will be entitled to participate in our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan at the Senior Vice President level; our stock option plan at the Senior Vice President level with at least 10,000 options to be granted annually; our flexible benefits program; and the Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Mr. Goulder is also entitled to receive other benefits normally provided to other Senior Vice Presidents including use of a company car.
The benefits that the named executive officers will receive upon a termination of their employment or a change in control are discussed below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” A description of the terms of stock options and performance sharesRSUs awarded to our named executive officers is included in the “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis section.
39
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20092012 Year-End
The following table provides information on the holdings of stock options and stock awards by the named executive officers as of February 28, 2009.29, 2012. This table includes unexercised and unvested stock option awardsoptions, unvested RSUs and unvested performance shares with performance conditions that have been satisfied but that have not yet been satisfied.otherwise vested. Each equity grant is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each unvested grant is shown in the footnotes to this table, based on the option or stock award grant date. Except as otherwise noted, the options represent optionsequity awards relate to purchase our Class A common shares. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing market price of American Greetings’ Class A common shares as of February 27, 2009, the last trading day of our fiscal year,29, 2012, which was $3.73. The performance shares are subject to specified performance objectives over the performance period. The market value as of February 27, 2009, shown below, assumes the satisfaction of these objectives.$15.00.
- 41 -
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2012 Year-End Table
Option Awards | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Option Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Stock Award Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | Option Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Stock Award Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | 3/1/1999 | 12,000 | $ | 23.56 | 3/1/09 | 4/22/2008 | 3,420 | (7) | $ | 12,757 | 5/3/2004 | (1) | 66,666 | — | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/3/2003 | 33,334 | $ | 13.15 | 3/3/13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/2/2004 | 7,081 | $ | 22.26 | 4/4/11 | 5/16/2005 | (1) | 100,000 | — | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/2/2004 | (1) | 5,694 | $ | 22.26 | 4/4/11 | 7/5/2005 | (1) | 25,473 | — | $ | 26.84 | 5/3/14 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2004 | (1) | 66,666 | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | 5/15/2006 | (1) | 100,000 | — | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/16/2005 | (1) | 100,000 | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | 6/22/2007 | (1) | 100,000 | — | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/5/2005 | (1) | 25,473 | $ | 26.84 | 5/3/14 | 5/1/2009 | (1) | — | 33,000 | (2) | $ | 7.73 | 5/1/19 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2006 | (1) | 66,667 | 33,333 | (2) | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | 5/3/2010 | (1) | 20,834 | 41,666 | (3) | $ | 24.69 | 5/3/20 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/22/2007 | (1) | 34,000 | 66,000 | (3) | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | — | — | — | — | — | 4/17/2009 | (1) | 20,000 | (5) | $ | 300,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/2008 | (1) | 100,000 | (4) | $ | 18.12 | 5/1/18 | — | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2010 | (1) | 10,416 | (6) | $ | 156,240 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2011 | (1) | 28,750 | (7) | $ | 431,250 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | 4/28/2003 | 7,000 | $ | 14.45 | 4/28/13 | 5/16/2005 | 8,750 | — | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2004 | 7,700 | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | 5/15/2006 | 8,050 | — | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/16/2005 | 8,750 | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | 12/26/2006 | 15,000 | — | $ | 23.98 | 12/26/16 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/26/2006 | 15,000 | $ | 23.98 | 12/26/16 | 5/2/2007 | 22,000 | — | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2006 | 8,050 | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | 5/1/2009 | 25,300 | — | $ | 7.73 | 5/1/19 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/2/2007 | 11,000 | 11,000 | (5) | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | 5/3/2010 | 6,325 | 6,325 | (4) | $ | 24.69 | 5/3/20 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/2008 | 22,000 | (6) | $ | 18.12 | 5/1/18 | — | — | — | — | — | 4/17/2009 | 9,000 | (5) | $ | 135,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2010 | 1,610 | (6) | $ | 24,150 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morry Weiss | 3/1/1999 | 54,000 | $ | 23.56 | 3/1/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2011 | 5,500 | (7) | $ | 82,500 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | 5/16/2005 | (1) | 75,000 | — | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/5/2005 | (1) | 10,317 | — | $ | 26.84 | 5/3/14 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2006 | (1) | 75,000 | — | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/2/2007 | (1) | 75,000 | — | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/2009 | (1) | — | 24,750 | (2) | $ | 7.73 | 5/1/19 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2010 | (1) | 15,625 | 31,250 | (3) | $ | 24.69 | 5/3/20 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 4/17/2009 | (1) | 17,000 | (5) | $ | 255,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2010 | (1) | 7,833 | (6) | $ | 117,495 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/11 | (1) | 21,620 | (7) | $ | 324,300 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John W. Beeder | 5/3/2010 | 10,938 | 10,937 | (4) | $ | 24.69 | 5/3/20 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 4/17/2009 | 12,000 | (5) | $ | 180,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2010 | 2,750 | (6) | $ | 41,250 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2011 | 11,000 | (7) | $ | 165,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | 5/3/2004 | 22,000 | — | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2002 | 18,000 | $ | 14.00 | 3/1/12 | 7/26/2004 | 13,000 | — | $ | 22.82 | 7/26/14 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/3/2003 | 18,000 | $ | 13.15 | 3/3/13 | 5/16/2005 | 43,750 | — | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/2/2004 | 19,310 | $ | 22.26 | 4/2/14 | 5/15/2006 | 40,250 | — | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/2/2004 | (1) | 52,655 | $ | 22.26 | 4/2/14 | 5/2/2007 | 43,750 | — | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2004 | (1) | 18,000 | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | 5/1/2008 | 43,750 | — | $ | 18.12 | 5/1/18 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/16/2005 | (1) | 18,000 | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | 5/1/2009 | 35,000 | — | $ | 7.73 | 5/1/19 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2006 | (1) | 18,000 | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | 5/3/2010 | 8,750 | 8,750 | (4) | $ | 24.69 | 5/3/20 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/2/2007 | (1) | 9,000 | 9,000 | (5) | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | — | — | — | — | — | 4/17/2009 | 12,000 | (5) | $ | 180,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/2008 | (1) | 18,000 | (6) | $ | 18.12 | 5/1/18 | — | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2010 | 2,200 | (6) | $ | 33,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 5/3/2011 | 8,800 | (7) | $ | 132,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | 3/1/1999 | 30,000 | $ | 23.56 | 3/1/09 | 4/22/2008 | 2,566 | (7) | $ | 9,571 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/3/2003 | 25,000 | $ | 13.15 | 3/3/13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/2/2004 | (1) | 5,215 | $ | 22.26 | 4/4/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/3/2004 | (1) | 61,500 | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/16/2005 | (1) | 75,000 | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/5/2005 | (1) | 10,317 | $ | 26.84 | 5/3/14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2006 | (1) | 50,000 | 25,000 | (2) | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/2/2007 | (1) | 25,500 | 49,500 | (3) | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/2008 | (1) | 75,000 | (4) | $ | 18.12 | 5/1/18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | 5/3/2004 | 22,000 | $ | 20.51 | 5/3/14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/2004 | 13,000 | $ | 22.82 | 7/26/14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/16/2005 | 43,750 | $ | 24.73 | 5/16/15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/15/2006 | 40,250 | $ | 22.65 | 5/15/16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/2/2007 | 21,875 | 21,875 | (5) | $ | 25.57 | 5/2/17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/2008 | 43,750 | (6) | $ | 18.12 | 5/1/18 |
40
(1) | Represents (i) options to purchase Class B common |
(2) | These options vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. |
(3) | 50% of these options will vest on each of the second and third |
(4) | These options will vest |
(5) | Represents the number of performance shares credited but not vested as of February 29, 2012. These |
- 42 -
(6) |
(7) |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 20092012
The following table provides information for the named executive officers regarding option exercises and the vesting of stock during fiscal 2009,2012, together with the associated value realized, each before payment of any applicable withholding tax.
Fiscal 2012 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | ||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | 174,834 | $ | 1,707,272 | (1) | 45,209 | (2) | $ | 723,557 | ||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | — | — | 19,610 | (3) | $ | 308,189 | ||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | 49,750 | $ | 579,533 | (1) | 37,917 | (4) | $ | 602,911 | ||||||||
John W. Beeder | 17,500 | $ | 283,850 | (1) | 26,750 | (5) | $ | 425,230 | ||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | — | — | 26,200 | (6) | $ | 412,184 |
(1) |
(2) | Includes (a) |
(3) | Includes (a) 9,000 Class A performance shares that were credited to the named executive officer in April 2010 based on fiscal 2010 performance and that vested on February 29, 2012, (b) 9,000 Class A performance shares that were credited to the named executive officer in April 2011 based on fiscal 2011 performance and that vested on February 29, 2012, and (c) 1,610 Class A RSUs that vested on May 3, 2011. |
(4) | Includes (a) 17,000 Class B performance shares that were credited to the named executive officer in April 2010 based on fiscal 2010 performance and that vested on February 29, 2012, (b) 17,000 Class B performance shares that were credited in April 2011 based on fiscal 2011 performance and that vested on February 29, 2012, and (c) 3,917 Class B RSUs that vested on May 3, 2011. |
(5) | Includes (a) 12,000 Class A performance shares that were credited to the named executive officer in April 2010 based on fiscal 2010 performance and that vested on February 29, 2012, (b) 12,000 Class A |
41
performance shares that were credited to the named executive officer in April 2011 based on fiscal 2011 performance and that vested on February 29, 2012, and (c) 2,750 Class A RSUs that vested on May 3, 2011. Mr. Beeder deferred receipt of 23,600 of his credited Class A performance shares and 2,641 Class A RSUs in accordance with the terms of the Executive Deferred Compensation |
(6) | Includes (a) 12,000 Class A performance shares that were credited |
Pension Benefits in Fiscal 20092012
The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the named executive officers, including the number of years of service credited to each such named executive officer, under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan based on the assumptions described in footnote one.one below.
The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits to officers at the Vice President level and above named as participants by the Board, which currently includes the named executive officers and all of our other executive officers. As of February 28, 2009,29, 2012, there were 2829 actively employed participants in the
- 43 -
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is designed to provide benefits that are competitive with those offered by other comparable companies, while requiring a meaningful tenure as an officer before a participant is eligible to receive benefits. Accordingly, to have a vested benefit in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, a participant must have at least ten years of service with us, five of which must be as a participant in the plan.
A Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan participant with a vested benefit who retires at age 65, which is considered normal retirement, will receive 1% of final average compensation for each year of service with us, up to a maximum of 20%. Therefore, a participant who retires at age 65 with 20 years of service (at least five of which are as a participant) will receive 20% of final average compensation annually for life. Participants with a vested benefit who terminate service with us after attaining the age of 55 may receive that benefit prior to age 65; however, benefits received prior to age 65 are reduced by .24%0.24% for each month prior to age 65. A participant with a vested benefit will receive benefits upon attaining the age of 55 if the participant separates from American Greetings prior to age 55 but after his or her 45th birthday, and he or she (1) is unilaterally terminated by American Greetings; (2) is among a class of executives who are no longer eligible to participate in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan; (3) is demoted to a class not eligible to participate in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan; or (4) separates after a change in control of American Greetings occurs. Final average compensation under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is defined as the average of the two highest years of annual compensation during the participant’s employment. Annual compensation is defined as actual annual base salary paid to the participant (calculated on a calendar year basis rather than on a fiscal year basis as salary is calculated for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table) plus the incentive that would have been paid under any annual incentive plan then in effect if the participant had been paid exactly 50% of his or her target incentive compensation. As a result of limiting the incentive compensation component to 50% of target compensation for purposes of determining pensionable bonus, the current covered compensation under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for purposes of the calculations set forth in the table below for Messrs. Zev Weiss, Stephen Smith, MorryJeffrey Weiss, Jeffrey WeissJohn Beeder and Michael Goulder were $1,382,188, $521,236, $500,000, $1,045,838$1,480,600, $590,561, $1,120,302, $715,353 and $668,829,$709,561, respectively. Benefits are payable in a single life annuity form, provided that benefits will be payable to the participant’s beneficiary in the event of the participant’s death until a total of 180 monthly payments have been made under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan to or on behalf of such participant. Benefits are not subject to offset for Social Security or other payments.
Of the named executive officers, only Mr. Morry Weiss is eligible to retire with a fully vested benefit in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as of February 28, 2009. We do not have a policy for granting extra pension service but may do so based on individual situations on rare occasions.
42
Fiscal 2012 Pension Benefits Table
Name | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit(1) ($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | Plan Name | Number of Years of Credited Service (#) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit(1) ($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | |||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 17 | $ | 521,580 | — | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 20 | $ | 1,640,460 | — | |||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 6 | $ | 79,866 | — | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 9 | $ | 333,534 | — | |||||||||||||
Morry Weiss | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 48 | $ | 1,956,199 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 21 | $ | 564,312 | — | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 24 | $ | 1,401,388 | — | |||||||||||||
John W. Beeder | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 4 | $ | 211,050 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 6 | $ | 147,302 | — | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 9 | $ | 486,403 | — |
(1) | The accumulated benefit is based on service and compensation, as described above, considered by the plan for the period through February |
- 44 -
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20092012
Officers at the Vice President level and above,Our executive officers, including the named executive officers, may participate in our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and defer all or a portion of their base salary and any cash incentive that they receive under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service places a limit on the compensation that can be used for contributions to a qualified retirement plan such as the 401(k) component of our Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. As a result, executive officers, at the Vice President level and above, including the named executive officers, are permitted to contribute more than the statutory maximum ($15,50016,500 for 2008)2011) under the 401(k) component of our Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, and receive a corresponding match on the additional contributions (40% of the first 6% of compensation deferred). We refer to these contributions in excess of the statutory maximum and the associated company match as the “maximizer benefit.” Similarly, our executives at the Vice President level and above, which includes our named executive officers, receive an additional profit sharing contribution based on that portion of the executive’s base salary that exceeds the statutory compensation limits ($230,000245,000 for 2008)2011), but is below a maximum amount set by us ($367,662 for 2011), which we refer to as the “restoration benefit.” The restoration benefit is calculated by determining the amount of profit sharing contributions made to all employees, expressed as a percentage of compensation, and multiplying that by athe portion of the executive’s compensation described in excess of the compensation limit imposed by the profit sharing plan.prior sentence. Any maximizer benefit or restoration benefit is credited to the officer’s account in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Any such compensation that is deferred into the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is credited to the officer’s account and invested at the officer’s direction in one or more of the following mutual funds: PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares, Wellington Fund Investor Shares, Vanguard 500 Index InvestorSignal Shares and Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund. The named executive officer’s earnings and account balance reflected below with respect to such deferred cash compensation is based on the return on the mutual funds in which the officer is invested.
Under our 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan and our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as in effect until December 8, 2011, executives may defer all or a portion of earned and vested equity awards. Any such equity awards that are deferred must be held in share equivalents of American Greetings. Each participant is credited with dividend equivalents with respect to any dividends paid on American Greetings common shares during the deferral period. The deferred shares, together with dividend equivalents, will be paid to the officer in the form of shares at the end of their deferral period. The named executive officer’s earnings and account balance reflected below with respect to deferred American Greetings shares are based on the annual return on such shares and the value of such shares as of February 28, 2009.29, 2012.
43
In an effort to eliminate compensation programs offered by us that are not widely utilized, yet are administratively burdensome to operate, on December 8, 2011, the Compensation Committee made the decision to freeze the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Accordingly, effective December 8, 2011, participants were no longer permitted to make new deferral elections under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferral elections made prior to December 8, 2011, however, will continue to be honored, and amounts previously deferred will remain deferred in accordance with existing deferral elections and may be re-deferred in accordance with the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. In addition, executive officers will continue to be eligible to receive amounts, if any, that are contributed by us as additional matching and profit sharing contributions under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan’s maximizer and restoration benefits based on our performance in the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012, but not for future years.
The payment of a named executive officer’s benefits under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan will begin within thirty days after the earlier of:
the expiration of the deferral period provided under the named executive officer’s deferral;
the date that he incurs an unforeseeable emergency;
the date that he terminates service with us for any reason;
the date his service is terminated by us for any reason other than cause; or
the date that he incurs a separation from service as defined by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which means an officer’s termination from employment with us as a result of the officer’s death, permanent and total disability, retirement or other such termination of employment.
If the named executive officer is terminated by us for cause, no benefits will be payable to the named executive officer other than amounts representing negotiated contributions as determined under the agreement that is in effect for each plan year and earnings thereon. If a named executive officer incurs an unforeseeable emergency, the early withdrawal of benefits is limited to the amount necessary to meet the emergency. In the case of any distribution payable as a result of a separation from service by a named executive officer, the distribution will begin no earlier than six months from the date of the separation from service, or if earlier, the date of the named executive officer’s death, all in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
- 45 -
Fiscal 2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
Name | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) (1) | Aggregate Earnings (Loss) in Last Fiscal Year ($) (2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year ($) | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Aggregate Earnings (Loss) in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zev Weiss | $ | 682,732 | (3) | $ | 16,576 | $ | (1,633,181 | ) | — | $ | 622,579 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,856 | ($ | 407,487 | ) | ($ | 947,133 | ) | $ | 966,761 | |||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | $ | 13,514 | (4) | $ | 6,552 | $ | (15,075 | ) | — | $ | 23,125 | $ | 35,619 | (5) | $ | 10,856 | ($ | 3,086 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 180,205 | |||||||||||||
Morry Weiss | $ | 0 | $ | 2,262 | $ | (80,247 | ) | — | $ | 116,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | $ | 508,098 | (3) | $ | 12,066 | $ | (1,282,685 | ) | — | $ | 427,794 | $ | 30,905 | (4) | $ | 16,218 | ($ | 89,307 | ) | ($ | 678,880 | ) | $ | 296,552 | ||||||||||||
John W. Beeder | $ | 438,648 | (6) | $ | 12,658 | ($ | 89,300 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 672,077 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | $ | 11,943 | (4) | $ | 6,802 | $ | (27,052 | ) | — | $ | 72,366 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,856 | $ | 8,643 | $ | 0 | $ | 181,214 |
(1) | Reflects the maximizer and restoration benefits contributions made by us and credited to the accounts of the named executive officers based on fiscal 2012 performance. These amounts are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. Does not include the maximizer and restoration benefits contributed in fiscal |
(2) | Reflects earnings or losses on each type of deferred compensation listed above. The earnings are calculated based on (a) the total number of units credited to the account multiplied by the price of American Greetings common shares or the applicable mutual fund as of February |
44
(3) |
(4) | Represents employee contributions under the maximizer benefit, which is included in the “Salary” column of the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. |
(5) | Of the amount reported, $18,121 represents salary deferrals and the remainder represents employee contributions under the maximizer benefit, all of which are included in the “Salary” column of the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. |
(6) | Of the amount reported, (a) $354,000 represents Class A performance shares that were deferred (included in the “Stock Awards” column of the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2010) (b) $62,645 represents Class A RSUs that were deferred (included in the “Stock Awards” column of the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2011), and (c) the remainder represents employee contributions under the maximizer benefit that are included in the “Salary” column of the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
We do not offer separate change in control agreements for our officers. However, we provide for the payment of severance and certain other benefits to our named executive officers upon certain types of terminations of employment, and upon a change in control, as described below. These benefits are in addition to benefits generally available to all salaried employees. In all cases, the timing and amount of payments will comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, including, in the case of an officer who is a Specified Employee as defined under Section 409A (which generally includes our fifty highest paid officers), the delay of payments until six months following the date of separation.
Employment Agreements. Pursuant to their employment agreements, dated May 1, 1997 and June 1, 1991, respectively, if each of Messrs. Zev or Jeffrey Weiss, as applicable, is terminated by us for any reason other than a gross violation of his obligations to us, we must pay him a continuing salary at a rate of the highest base salary paid to him during the preceding six months for a period equivalent to one-half month for each year of his employment with us, but in no event will such payment be less than three months or greater than twelve months. The agreements each contain a customary confidentiality provision and prohibit Messrs. Zev or Jeffrey Weiss, as applicable, from working for any of our competitors in the United States or Canada for a period of twelve months following their employment with us. In addition, if Messrs. Zev or Jeffrey Weiss, as applicable, sign a waiver
- 46 -
and release agreement at the time of his termination of employment, he will receive the greater of the benefits provided in his employment agreement or the benefits provided under our American Greetings Severance Benefits Plan (Officers), which is described in greater detail below under “Severance Benefits Plan.”
Pursuant to his employment agreement, dated April 14, 2003, if Mr. Smith is terminated by us for any reason other than a gross violation of his obligations to us, we are required to pay him the highest base salary paid to him during the preceding six months for a period of twelve months. The agreement contains a customary confidentiality provision and prohibits Mr. Smith from working for any of our competitors in the United States or Canada for a period of twelve months following his employment with us. In addition, if Mr. Smith signs a waiver and release agreement at the time of his termination of employment, he will receive the greater of the benefits provided in his employment agreement or the benefits provided under our American Greetings Severance Benefits Plan (Officers) described below.
Mr. Beeder has an employment agreement with us dated June 12, 2008, which provides that if he is involuntarily terminated without cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or if Mr. Beeder terminates his employment because we have materially reduced his title, authority, duties and responsibilities (other than as a result of a change in control, as defined in his employment agreement), and, in each case, he executes a waiver and release for any claims against the company, he will be entitled to twelve months base salary at the salary in effect at the time of separation (reduced by the amount of salary Mr. Beeder may receive from subsequent employment during that period), which will not be less than $440,000, participation in our health care and life
45
insurance programs for twelve months following termination (at premiums and rates otherwise available to active employees), and outplacement services. If Mr. Beeder is involuntarily terminated without cause but he does not execute a waiver and release for any claims against the company, then Mr. Beeder will only be entitled to three months base salary at the salary in effect at the time of separation. Mr. Beeder’s employment agreement also provides that if his employment agreement is terminated by us as a result of a change in control or by Mr. Beeder because we have materially reduced his title, authority or responsibilities as a result of a change in control, he will be entitled to twelve months base salary at the salary in effect at the time of separation, which will not be less than $440,000; provided such amount will be reduced by the amount of salary Mr. Beeder may receive from subsequent employment during that period. Mr. Beeder’s agreement contains a customary confidentiality provision and prohibits Mr. Beeder from working for any of our competitors in the United States or Canada for a period of twelve months following his employment with us.
Mr. Goulder has an agreement with us dated October 17, 2002 that provides that if (1) he is involuntarily terminated for reasons other than a gross violation of his obligations to us; (2) his duties are reduced to a position below that of a Senior Vice President; or (3) there is a change of control in our ownership, he will be entitled to:
twelve months base salary at the salary in effect at the time of separation, which will not be less than $330,000;
if he has completed six months of active employment in the fiscal year of separation, continued participation in our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan for that fiscal year, which will be at the job level at the time of separation, with the payout based on the actual payout percentage earned and base salary earnings for the fiscal year up to the separation date;
continued vesting of any stock options that would otherwise vest during the twelve months following termination and the ability to exercise any vested options for up to 90 days following the end of the twelve months following termination;
participation in our health care and life insurance programs for twelve months following termination (at premiums and rates otherwise available to active employees); and
continued use of a company car for 90 days after his termination (all other executive officers receive continued use of a company car for 30 days following termination by us without cause).
Severance Benefits Plan. The American Greetings Severance Benefits Plan (Officers) provides severance benefits to our U.S. executive officers who lose their positions involuntarily other than as a result of a gross violation of their obligations to us. Upon a change in control, there is no payment to an officer unless there is a subsequent termination due to the fact that the officer is not offered a comparable position. If an officer does not sign a waiver and release agreement at the time of termination, the officer will receive one-half of one month’s base salary (exclusive of bonus, commission or other incentives). If an officer signs a waiver and release agreement at the time of termination, the officer will receive (a)(1) one month’s base salary (exclusive of bonus, commission or other incentives) for each year of continuous service completed with us, with a minimum total benefit of at least twelve months and a maximum total benefit of 24twenty-four months, and (b)(2) outplacement services for six months to assist the officer in seeking employment. In addition, each officer will receive continued health care coverage concurrently with COBRA in the plan in which the officer was enrolled at the time of termination at the employee payroll deduction rate through the end of the applicable severance period, and we will deduct the monthly premium from the severance payment. We will make the severance payments on a monthly basis or in a lump sum, at our discretion. Mr. Beeder and Mr. Goulder doesdo not participate in the American Greetings Severance Benefits Plan (Officers) and receivesreceive severance according to the terms of his agreementtheir respective agreements described above.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.The. The named executive officers participate in our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which is described above under “Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2009.2012.” Please see the narrative and the table in that section for information regarding the circumstances in our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that will trigger payments or the provision of benefits and the calculation of those benefits. In addition to those circumstances, if a named executive officer becomes disabled and is eligible for and receiving
- 47 -
benefits under our Long-Term Disability Plan, the named executive officer may begin receiving a disability
46
retirement benefit under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan on the later of the first day of the month coinciding with or next following: (a)(1) the date the named executive officer stops receiving benefit payments under the Long-Term Disability PlanPlan; and (b)(2) the date the named executive officer reaches age 65. The benefit payable to a named executive officer will be his accrued benefit determined as of the date he began receiving benefits under the Long-Term Disability Plan. If the named executive officer is not eligible to receive benefits under our Long-Term Disability Plan, his accrued benefit will be determined as of the date he is determined to have a disability under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Limitations on Benefits. During a named executive officer’s participation in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and for a period of two years following the date he separates from employment with us, each named executive officer must comply with certain obligations, including confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-disparagement obligations, obligations to disclose business opportunities to us, and obligations to refrain from engaging in criminal conduct. If a named executive officer violates one or more of the foregoing items,obligations, he will immediately forfeit any and all rights to benefits under the plan. In addition, for a period of ten years following the date a named executive officer separates from employment with us, he must (a)(1) refrain from engaging in certain competitive activities; (b)activities, (2) provide consulting services to us upon our request;request, and (c)(3) not commence or threaten to commence an action seeking recovery of a benefit under the plan that has been completely or partially denied or to enforce the terms of the plan without first signing a confidentiality agreement regarding the claim. If the named executive officer violates one or more of the foregoing items, we will not be required to pay any benefits to him. Under the plan, each named executive officer must assign and transfer to us any and all discoveries, inventions and improvements that he has conceived, or may make, conceive, acquire or suggest, whether solely or jointly with others during his employment by us, and which relate to any subject matter within the field in which he provides personal services to us and involves the use of resources belonging to us.
Committee Discretion to Impose Lesser Sanctions. If the Compensation and Management Development Committee determines that the financial impact on us from a violation of any of the requirements set forth in the “Limitations on Benefits” section described above is expected to be less than $250,000 in the aggregate, in lieu of the complete forfeiture of the named executive officer’s benefit the Compensation Committee may impose a limited monetary sanction equal to the lesser of (a)(1) one-half of the present value of his benefit under the plan (determined as of the date of the violation) or (b)(2) $100,000, as a set off against the plan benefit otherwise payable.
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The named executive officers participate in our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan described above under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2009.2012.” Please see the narrative and the table in that section for information regarding the circumstances in our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan that will trigger payments or the provision of benefits and the calculation of those benefits.
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. The named executive officers participate in our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. Please see the “Key“Analysis of Compensation Elements Paid to Named Executive Officers – Key Management Annual Incentive Plan” section in the “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis section for a more detailed description of our Key Management Annual Incentive Plan. If Messrs. Zev Weiss, Stephen Smith, Morry Weiss or Jeffrey Weissa named executive officer voluntarily or involuntarily leaves usseparates employment before the completion of a plan year, which coincides with our fiscal year, the officer will forfeit his award for that fiscal year. If a named executive officer’s employment with us ends during a plan year because the named executive officer (a)(1) elects to retire after age 60; (b)60, (2) takes a leave of absence;absence, or (c)(3) suffers a permanent disability or dies, the incentive payout will be prorated to the nearest full month based on the actual period the officer participated in the plan during the fiscal year. Pursuant to his employment agreement, if Mr. Goulder separates from employment with us under certain circumstances and has completed six months of active employment in that fiscal year of separation, he will receive a payment based on his earnings for that portion of the fiscal year.
- 48 -
Equity Incentive Plans. Each of our named executive officers has one or more grants of options outstanding under our American Greetings Corporation 1997 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, our 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, or both.
According to the terms of their stock option agreements, all options become immediately exercisable in full if the named executive officer dies, becomes permanently disabled or incompetent, or has ten or more years of continuous service with us and terminates employment at age 65. In addition, options granted to our named executive officers terminate on the earliest of the following
47
dates: (a)(1) ten years from the date of grant; (b)(2) nine months from the date of permanent disability of the named executive officer if the same was the cause of, or occurred within three months after, termination of the named executive officer’s employment with us; (c)(3) immediately, on the date the grantee’s employment is terminated for cause (in the case of grants under the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan), or on the date of an act by the officer that is intentionally committed and materially inimical to our interests (in the case of grants under the 1997 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan); or (d)(4) three months from the date of termination of employment in all other cases.
UnderEach of our named executive officers has one or more grants of RSUs outstanding under our 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. Except as described below, RSUs not vested on the terms ofdate the April 2008 performance share grant agreements that we have entered into with each of Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss, all of the performance shares not otherwise previously vested, earned or forfeitednamed executive officer separates from American Greetings will be deemed earned and shall be issued upon (a)forfeited. If the named executive officer’s death; (b)employment ends because he elects to retire at age 65 with ten years of continuous service, suffers a permanent disability, (as such term is defined in Section 409A(a)(2)or dies, RSUs that have not vested as of the Internal Revenue Code); or (c) our change in control (as defined in our 1997 Equitydate of separation will immediately vest on the date of separation on a pro-rata basis. The pro-rata percentage of shares that vest will be determined based on the period of time between the date the RSUs were granted and Performance Incentive Plan,the separation date, as a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10 to our Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-121982) filed on January 12, 2005). Copiespercentage of the full vesting period. If the named executive officer is terminated for cause, any RSUs not yet vested or vested but not issued, will also be forfeited.
Each of our named executive officers has a grant of performance share grant agreementsshares outstanding under our 2007 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. Except as described below, shares not vested on the date the named executive officer separates from American Greetings will be forfeited. If the named executive officer’s employment ends because he elects to retire at age 65 with ten years of continuous service, suffers a permanent disability, dies, or is involuntary separated without cause, shares that have not yet been credited as of the date of separation are attachedforfeited. Under those same circumstances, shares that are credited but not yet vested will immediately vest on the date of separation on a pro-rata basis. The pro-rata percentage of shares that vest will be determined based on the period of time between the date the shares were credited and the separation date, as Exhibits 10.7 and 10.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-Ka percentage of the full vesting period. If the named executive officer is terminated for the year ended February 29, 2008.cause, any performance shares credited but not yet vested or vested but not issued, will also be forfeited.
Life Insurance Benefits. For a description of the executive life insurance that provides coverage to the named executive officers, see footnote 6(d) to the above Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. We provide this coverage, together with any associated tax reimbursement, for six months following the termination of an executive officer by us without cause. We provide each named executive officer withto receive accidental death and dismemberment insurance, which entitles the beneficiaries of each named executive officerproceeds in an amount equal to receive supplemental accidental death and dismemberment proceeds$275,000. Additionally, we provide Business Travel Accident Insurance in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) three times his annual salary or (2) $3 million, subject to a minimum of $250,000 for each named executive officer.
Quantitative Disclosure. The tables below reflect the amount of compensation that would be paid to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination of such executive’s employment, disability or following a change in control. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of February 28, 2009,29, 2012, and thus include amounts earned through such date. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s actual separation. As necessary for purposes of calculations, we have used the closing price of our Class A common shares on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE on February 27, 2009,29, 2012, the last trading day of our fiscal year, which was $3.73.$15.00. The amounts shown do not include benefits and payments that are generally available to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis.
- 49 -
Zev Weiss (Chief Executive Officer)
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | — | $ | 1,228,612 | (1) | — | $ | 1,228,612 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 1,562,856 | (1) | — | $ | 1,562,856 | (1) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan (2) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 996,039 | $ | 996,039 | $ | 996,039 | $ | 399,946 | $ | 996,039 | — | $ | 996,039 | $ | 996,039 | $ | 996,039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 239,910 | $ | 239,910 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | — | — | — | — | $ | 127,596 | $127,596 | $ | 127,596 | $ | 127,596 | — | — | — | $ | 150,000 | — | $ | 150,000 | — | $ | 150,000 | $ | 150,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 184,890 | $ | 184,890 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 521,580 | (3) | — | — | — | $ | 1,640,460 | (3) | —(7) | $ | 1,640,460 | (3) | — | — | $ | 1,640,460 | (3) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 622,579 | $ | 622,579 | $ | 622,579 | $ | 561,093 | $ | 622,579 | — | $ | 622,579 | $ | 622,579 | $ | 622,579 | $ | 966,761 | $ | 966,761 | $ | 966,761 | $ | 869,018 | $ | 966,761 | — | $ | 966,761 | $ | 966,761 | $ | 966,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 16,163 | — | $ | 16,163 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 16,974 | — | $ | 16,974 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 7,528,754 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 8,172,400 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services (5) | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums (6) | — | — | $ | 14,972 | — | $ | 14,972 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 17,267 | — | $ | 17,267 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | — | $ | 948 | — | $ | 948 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 1,842 | — | $ | 1,842 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 622,579 | $ | 622,579 | $ | 1,898,274 | $ | 561,093 | $ | 2,025,870 | $127,596 | $ | 8,276,929 | $ | 1,271,755 | $ | 622,579 | $ | 1,962,800 | $ | 1,962,800 | $ | 5,367,199 | $ | 1,268,964 | $ | 5,367,199 | $ | 0 | $ | 10,710,000 | $ | 4,178,060 | $ | 1,962,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | — | $ | 386,100 | — | $ | 386,100 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual | $ | 26,693 | $ | 26,693 | $ | 26,693 | — | $ | 26,693 | — | $ | 26,693 | $ | 26,693 | $ | 26,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 79,866 | (3) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 23,125 | $ | 23,125 | $ | 23,125 | $ | 15,312 | $ | 23,125 | — | — | $ | 23,125 | $ | 23,125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 10,727 | — | $ | 10,727 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 3,341,604 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services (5) | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums (6) | — | — | $ | 8,894 | — | $ | 8,894 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | — | $ | 864 | — | $ | 864 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 49,818 | $ | 49,818 | $ | 471,403 | $ | 15,312 | $ | 471,403 | $ 0 | $ | 3,368,297 | $ | 129,684 | $ | 49,818 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morry Weiss (Chairman) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | — | $ | 800,000 | — | $ | 800,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan (2) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplement Executive Retirement Plan | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | — | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | $ | 1,956,199 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 116,815 | $ | 116,815 | $ | 116,815 | $ | 68,854 | $ | 116,815 | — | $ | 116,815 | $ | 116,815 | $ | 116,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 10,402 | — | $ | 10,402 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 4,050,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services (5) | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums (6) | — | — | $ | 48,549 | — | $ | 48,549 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | — | $ | 1,544 | — | $ | 1,544 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,073,014 | $ | 2,073,014 | $ | 2,948,509 | $ | 2,025,053 | $ | 2,948,509 | $ 0 | $ | 6,123,014 | $ | 2,073,014 | $ | 2,073,014 |
Stephen J. Smith (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
- 50 -
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | — | $ | 437,453 | — | $ | 437,453 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan(2) | $ | 309,484 | $ | 309,484 | $ | 309,484 | $ | 124,269 | $ | 309,484 | — | $ | 309,484 | $ | 309,484 | $ | 309,484 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | — | — | $ | 67,500 | — | $ | 67,500 | — | $ | 67,500 | $ | 67,500 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 54,510 | $ | 54,510 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 333,534 | (3) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 180,205 | $ | 180,205 | $ | 180,205 | $ | 141,621 | $ | 180,205 | — | $ | 180,205 | $ | 180,205 | $ | 180,205 | |||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 10,721 | — | $ | 10,721 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds(4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 3,994,866 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services(5) | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums(6) | — | — | $ | 12,372 | — | $ | 12,372 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | — | $ | 1,305 | — | $ | 1,305 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Total | $489,689 | $489,689 | $ | 1,034,040 | $ | 265,890 | $ | 1,034,040 | $0 | $4,606,565 | $945,233 | $489,689 |
Jeffrey Weiss (President and Chief Operating Officer)
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | — | $ | 1,202,113 | (1) | — | $ | 1,202,113 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 1,480,860 | (1) | — | $ | 1,480,860 | (1) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan (2) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 701,681 | $ | 701,681 | $ | 701,681 | $ | 281,750 | $ | 701,681 | — | $ | 701,681 | $ | 701,681 | $ | 701,681 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 179,933 | $ | 179,933 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | $ | 95,697 | $ | 95,697 | $ | 95,697 | $ | 95,697 | — | — | — | $ | 127,500 | — | $ | 127,500 | — | $ | 127,500 | $ | 127,500 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplement Executive Retirement Plan | — | $ | 564,312 | (3) | $ | 564,312 | (3) | — | $ | 564,312 | (3) | — | — | $ | 564,312 | (3) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 139,050 | $ | 139,050 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | 1,401,388 | (3) | —(7) | $ | 1,401,388 | (3) | — | — | $ | 1,401,388 | (3) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 427,794 | $ | 427,794 | $ | 427,794 | $ | 380,453 | $ | 427,794 | — | $ | 427,794 | $ | 427,794 | $ | 427,794 | $ | 296,552 | $ | 296,552 | $ | 296,552 | $ | 187,937 | $ | 296,552 | — | $ | 296,552 | $ | 296,552 | $ | 296,552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 18,330 | — | $ | 18,330 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 21,008 | — | $ | 21,008 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 4,377,608 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 4,935,732 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services (5) | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums (6) | — | — | $ | 13,842 | — | $ | 13,842 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 14,792 | $ | 14,792 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | — | $ | 679 | — | $ | 679 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 1,123 | — | $ | 1,123 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 427,794 | $ | 992,106 | $ | 2,242,070 | $ | 380,453 | $ | 2,334,767 | $ | 95,697 | $ | 4,901,099 | $ | 1,087,803 | $ | 427,794 | $998,233 | $998,233 | $ | 4,059,904 | $ | 469,687 | $ | 4,059,904 | $0 | $6,380,448 | $2,846,104 | $998,233 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder (Senior Vice President and Executive Supply Chain Officer) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | $ | 477,735 | $ | 477,735 | — | $ | 477,735 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplement Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 147,302 | (3) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 72,366 | $ | 72,366 | $ | 72,366 | $ | 54,939 | $ | 72,366 | — | $ | 72,366 | $ | 72,366 | $ | 72,366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 6,940 | — | $ | 6,940 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 2,916,410 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums (6) | — | $ | 11,374 | $ | 11,374 | — | $ | 11,374 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | $ | 2,238 | $ | 2,238 | — | $ | 2,238 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 72,366 | $ | 563,713 | $ | 570,653 | $ | 54,939 | $ | 570,653 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,988,776 | $ | 219,668 | $ | 72,366 |
49
John W. Beeder (Senior Vice President – Executive Sales and Marketing Officer)
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | $562,900(8) | $ | 562,900 | (8) | — | $ | 562,900 | (8) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan(2) | $ | 432,139 | $ | 432,139 | $ | 432,139 | $ | 173,519 | $ | 432,139 | — | $ | 432,139 | $ | 432,139 | $ | 432,139 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | — | — | $ | 90,000 | — | $ | 90,000 | — | $ | 90,000 | $ | 90,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 103,125 | $ | 103,125 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 211,050 | (3) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 672,077 | $ | 672,077 | $ | 672,077 | $ | 647,354 | $ | 672,077 | — | $ | 672,077 | $ | 672,077 | $ | 672,077 | |||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 10,740 | (8) | — | $ | 10,740 | (8) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds(4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 3,370,084 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services(5) | — | $15,000(8) | $ | 15,000 | (8) | — | $ | 15,000 | (8) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums(6) | — | — | $ | 12,109 | (8) | — | $ | 12,109 | (8) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | — | $ | 1,028 | — | $ | 1,028 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,104,216 | $ | 1,682,116 | $ | 1,795,993 | $ | 820,873 | $ | 1,795,993 | $ | 0 | $ | 4,667,425 | $ | 1,508,391 | $ | 1,104,216 |
Michael L. Goulder (Senior Vice President –Executive Supply Chain Officer)
Benefits and Payments | Resignation without Good Reason | Resignation with Good Reason | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us for Cause | Termination Following Change in Control | Change in Control (no termination) | Death | Disability | Early Retirement (Rule of 65) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary | — | $ | 506,829 | $ | 506,829 | — | $ | 506,829 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Management Annual Incentive Plan(2) | $ | 409,790 | $ | 409,790 | $ | 409,790 | $ | 164,545 | $ | 409,790 | — | $ | 409,790 | $ | 409,790 | $ | 409,790 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | — | — | $ | 90,000 | — | $ | 90,000 | — | $ | 90,000 | $ | 90,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 82,500 | $ | 82,500 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 486,403 | (3) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation | $ | 181,214 | $ | 181,214 | $ | 181,214 | $ | 130,868 | $ | 181,214 | — | $ | 181,214 | $ | 181,214 | $ | 181,214 | |||||||||||||||||||
Health Care | — | — | $ | 10,961 | — | $ | 10,961 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Proceeds(4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 3,340,974 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outplacement Services(5) | — | — | $ | 15,000 | — | $ | 15,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life Insurance Premiums(6) | — | — | $ | 13,493 | — | $ | 13,493 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Car | — | $ | 2,791 | $ | 2,791 | — | $ | 2,791 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 591,004 | $ | 1,100,624 | $ | 1,230,078 | $ | 295,413 | $ | 1,230,078 | $ | 0 | $ | 4,104,478 | $ | 1,249,907 | $ | 591,004 |
(1) | Assumes that the named executive officer signed the requisite waiver and release agreement contemplated by the American Greetings Severance Benefit Plan (Officers) as described above, entitling him to |
(2) | If |
- 51 -
(3) | Represents the present value of the accrued benefit. |
(4) | Assumes that the officer’s death occurred as the result of an accident covered under our accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy and our business travel accident insurance policy. The amounts represent the proceeds to be paid by the applicable insurance company to which |
50
(5) | Assumes that the named executive officer signs the requisite waiver and release agreement contemplated by the American Greetings Severance Benefit Plan (Officers) as described above, entitling him to six months of outplacement services, the value of which we estimate to be equal to $15,000 as of February |
(6) | Includes amounts reimbursed for the payment of taxes on income attributed to the officer for the value of universal life insurance premiums paid by American Greetings. |
(7) | Assumes that the named executive officer is terminated for violating his obligations as set forth in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. |
- 52 -
(8) | Assumes that the named executive officer signs the requisite waiver and release agreement pursuant to his employment agreement. If he does not sign the waiver and release agreement, the amounts he will receive in these categories will be reduced or eliminated. |
51
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
We use a combination of cash and equity-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board of Directors.Board. The compensation we pay our non-employee directors is designed to fairly pay directors for work required for a company of our size and scope, to align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of shareholders, and to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our Board. In setting director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that directors spend in fulfilling their duties to American Greetings, the skill level we require of members of the Board, and the compensation paid to directors of companies of our size and structure. Employees of American Greetings who are also directors are not compensated for serving on the Board of Directors.Board.
Cash Compensation Paid to Board Members
During fiscal 2009,2012, each non-employee director was entitled to receive the following cash compensation with respect to his or her service on the Board:
An$70,000 annual Board retainer of $40,000;fee;
$1,500 for each Board or committee meeting attended in person (75% of the applicable meeting fee if the meeting is conducted telephonically), with the members of the Audit Committee to receive an additional $500 (for a total of $2,000) for attending each Audit Committee meeting (including from time to time, in each case, for conferences with management regarding Board or committee-related matters);
$7,000 annual retainer fee to respective chairs of the Nominating and Governance and the Compensation and Management Development Committees;
$10,000 annual retainer fee to the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; $15,000 annual retainer fee to the chair of the Compensation and Management Development Committee; and $20,000 annual retainer fee to the chair of the Audit Committee;
$7,500 annual retainer fee to non-chair members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation and Management Development Committee and $10,000 annual retainer fee to non-chair members of the Audit Committee; and
Reimbursement of expenses related to attending Board and committee meetings.
From time to time, the Board may establish additional committees or subcommittees relating to specific matters. Although these committees are not standing committees and are formed on a temporary basis, directors serving on these committees are typically paid an additional retainer and/or a fee for meetings that they attend. Directors may make an election to receive American Greetings’ Class A or Class B common shares in lieu of all or a portion of the fees due to such directors as compensation for serving on the Board of Directors.Board. All of such shares are fully vested. For purposes of determining the number of shares to be issued in lieu of such fees, the shares are valued based on the closing price of the American GreetingsGreetings’ Class A common shares on the last trading day of the calendar quarter prior to the payment of such fees. During fiscal 2012, all of the independent directors elected to receive their retainers and fees in cash.
Stock OptionRSU Program
In addition to cash compensation, to further align non-employee directors’ interests with the interests of our shareholders, each year non-employee directors receive an annual grant of options to purchase our Class A common shares.RSUs. In accordance with our stock option grant policy, the annual RSU grant of options to purchase 7,000 Class A common shares to our non-employee directors which is made at the same time as the annual grant is made to our officers, is made on the second trading day following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. HalfThe RSUs vest in one-half increments on each of these options are exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and half on the second anniversarytwo anniversaries of the date of grant. The exerciseannual grant made in May 2011 was fixed at RSUs representing 3,800 Class A common shares. Consistent with the decision to base the grant size of RSUs made to our employees on a fixed dollar value of shares because the value of the RSU grant both to the recipient and for purposes of calculating the expense recorded by the company could vary greatly depending on the trading price of our common shares on the annualdate of grant if the grant size is a set number of optionsshares, beginning with grants made in May 2012 (fiscal 2013), the size of the RSU grant is based on a fixed dollar value of shares of $90,000 for each director. The dollar value of the fiscal 2013 target grant size was $18.12 per share, representingset at a level intended to approximate the aggregate value of the RSU grants made during fiscal 2012 based on the closing price of our Class A common shares on that date of grant, May 1, 2008,3, 2011, which was $23.72. The actual number of RSUs granted will vary in size depending on the closing price of our common shares on the date of grant. The full grant date fair value under SFAS 123(R) of such options to purchase 7,000 Class A common shares was $21,955. Generally, the full grant date fair value is the amount that we would expense in our financial statements over the award’s vesting schedule. Assumptions used in calculating this amount are included in footnote 15 to our audited financial statements for fiscal 2009 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2009. These amounts reflect our accounting expense, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the director.
- 53 -
Deferred Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
The American Greetings Outside Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan allowsallowed for each non-employee director to defer all or part of his or her compensation. Any cash compensation that is deferred is credited to the director’s account and invested according to the director’s instruction in the following mutual funds: PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares, Wellington Fund Investor Shares, Vanguard 500 Index InvestorSignal Shares and Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund. If a director electselected to defer his or her retainer or committee fees that are received in the form of shares, such deferred compensation is held in share equivalents of American Greetings. Each participant is credited with dividend equivalents with respect to any dividends paid on American Greetings common shares during the deferral period. The deferred shares, together with dividend equivalents, will be paid to the director in the form of shares at the end of their deferral period. No portion of a director’s earnings under the Outside Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan are “above-market” or preferential, as defined in applicable rules of the SecuritiesSEC. In an effort to eliminate compensation programs offered by us that are not widely utilized, yet are administratively burdensome to operate, on December 8, 2011, the Compensation Committee made the decision to freeze the Outside Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Accordingly, effective December 8, 2011, outside directors were no longer permitted to make new deferral elections under the Outside Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferral elections made prior to December 8, 2011, however, will continue to be honored, and Exchange Commission.amounts previously deferred will remain deferred in accordance with existing deferral elections and may be re-deferred in accordance with the Outside Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.
Director Compensation Table
Name (1) | Fees ($) (2) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) (3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | |||||||||||
Scott S. Cowen | $ | 86,250 | — | $ | 25,835 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 112,175 | |||||||
Jeffrey D. Dunn(5) | $ | 59,250 | — | $ | 29,929 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 89,269 | |||||||
Joseph S. Hardin, Jr. | $ | 62,875 | — | $ | 25,835 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 88,800 | |||||||
Stephen R. Hardis(5)(6) | $ | 35,667 | — | $ | 25,835 | — | — | $ | 0 | $ | 61,502 | |||||||
William E. MacDonald, III | $ | 89,417 | — | $ | 29,929 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 119,436 | |||||||
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | $ | 61,000 | — | $ | 30,862 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 91,952 | |||||||
Charles A. Ratner(5) | $ | 74,750 | — | $ | 25,835 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 100,675 | |||||||
Jerry Sue Thornton(5) | $ | 71,000 | — | $ | 25,835 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 96,925 |
Name(1) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(2) | Stock Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Scott S. Cowen | $ | 95,000 | $ | 86,797 | — | — | $ | 10,090 | (5) | $ | 191,887 | |||||||||||||
Jeffrey D. Dunn | $ | 87,500 | $ | 86,797 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 174,387 | ||||||||||||||
William E. MacDonald, III | $ | 97,500 | $ | 86,797 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 184,387 | ||||||||||||||
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | $ | 87,500 | $ | 86,797 | — | — | $ | 10,090 | (5) | $ | 184,387 | |||||||||||||
Charles A. Ratner | $ | 87,500 | $ | 86,797 | — | — | $ | 90 | $ | 174,387 | ||||||||||||||
Jerry Sue Thornton | $ | 85,000 | $ | 86,797 | — | — | $ | 10,090 | (5) | $ | 181,887 |
(1) | Zev Weiss, our Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey Weiss, our President and Chief Operating Officer, and Morry Weiss, our Chairman, are not included in this table as they are employees of American Greetings and thus receive no compensation for their services as directors. As named executive officers, the compensation received by Messrs. Zev |
(2) | As described above, directors may elect to receive a portion of their |
(3) | Reflects the |
- 54 -
|
As of February 29, 2012, each director had the following number of options and RSUs outstanding:
Name | RSUs | Options | ||
Scott S. Cowen | 3,800 | 65,000 | ||
Jeffrey D. Dunn | 3,800 | 44,000 | ||
William E. MacDonald, III | 3,800 | 44,000 | ||
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | 3,800 | 51,000 | ||
Charles A. Ratner | 3,800 | 69,000 | ||
Jerry Sue Thornton | 3,800 | 69,000 |
(4) |
(5) | In fiscal 2012, we established a charitable matching contribution program under which we will match, in any given fiscal year, up to $10,000 of contributions made by an independent director to a charitable or other non-profit organization. The |
54
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions
Policy. The Board has adopted a written policy and procedures for review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving American Greetings and “related persons,” which generally includes directors, executive officers and their immediate family members, and shareholders owning five percent or greater of our outstanding stock and their immediate family members. The policy covers related person transactions that meet the minimum threshold for disclosure in the proxy statement under the relevant rules of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest). Due to the nature of the transaction or the approvals previously obtained, the policy considers the following categories of transactions to be pre-approved even if the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000:
compensation paid to our executive officers and immediate family members of our executive officers or directors that has been approved or ratified by the Compensation Committee;
compensation paid to our directors;
transactions with another company at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), director or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million, or 2% of that company’s annual gross revenues;
charitable contributions, grants or endowments by American Greetings to a charitable organization at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), director or trustee, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts or annual gross revenue (which transactions are generally approved or ratified by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee);
transactions where the related person’s interest arises solely from the ownership of our common shares and all holders of our common shares received the same benefit on a pro rata basis, such as dividends; and
transactions with a related person involving services such as a bank depositarydepository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar services.services; and
any transaction with a related person involving the offer and sale to the company of Class B common shares, or exchange of Class B common shares for Class A common shares, in each case provided such offer, sale or exchange is effected in accordance with our articles of incorporation.
Related person transactions not otherwise pre-approved as described above must be approved or ratified by the Audit Committee, which will consider all relevant facts in doing so. As required under Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC rules, transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to American Greetings or a related person are disclosed in the proxy statement.
Procedures. The American Greetings legal staff is primarily responsible for developing and implementing processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related
- 55 -
person transactions and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether American Greetings or a related person may have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. If it is determined that American Greetings or a related person may have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction, the legal department will submit the matter to the Audit Committee for review and approval, if appropriate. Any member of the Audit Committee who may have a direct or indirect interest in the transaction in question must recuse himself or herself from any consideration of the matter. The Audit Committee will review all of the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction. Based on the conclusions reached, the Audit Committee will evaluate all options, including but not limited to approving, disapproving or restructuring the proposed transaction.
If it is not practical or desirable to wait until the next regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting to consider a potential related partyperson transaction, the matter will be submitted to the chair of the Audit Committee,
55
who has been delegated the authority to act between meetings. The chair will report any decisions made to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. If management becomes aware of a related partyperson transaction that was not previously reviewed or ratified, it will refer the matter to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting at which time the Audit Committee or the chair of the Audit Committee shall evaluate all options, including but not limited to ratification, amendment, or termination of the related partyperson transaction.
Related PartyPerson Transactions
Compensation paid to related persons.Morry Weiss, our Chairman of the Board, is the brother of Erwin Weiss, oura Senior Vice President Enterprise Resource Planning,of American Greetings, and is the father of (1) Zev Weiss, a director of American Greetings and our Chief Executive Officer, (2) Jeffrey Weiss, a director of American Greetings and our President and Chief Operating Officer, and (3) Gary Weiss, an American Greetings employee and non-executive officer. As employees of American Greetings, these individuals are compensated in a manner that is appropriate for their responsibilities and experience. The compensation paid to each of Messrs. Zev Morry and Jeffrey Weiss is described in the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table and in the tables that follow the Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table. With respect to fiscal 2009, we paid2012, the following compensation was accrued by, or paid to, Messrs. Morry, Erwin and Gary Weiss, neithernone of whom areis a named executive officers:officer:
• | Morry Weiss: With respect to fiscal 2012, Mr. Morry Weiss was paid a base salary of $400,000, earned incentive compensation under the Key Management Annual Incentive Plan of $203,120 and participated in other regular and customary employee benefit plans, programs and benefits generally available to our executive officers, including participation in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and use of a company car, as well as those described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section under the headings “Benefits” and “Perquisites and Other Benefits.” In addition, in fiscal 2012, Mr. Morry Weiss was granted 4,500 RSUs, which had a grant date value as calculated in accordance with Topic 718 of $102,786. |
• | Erwin Weiss: Under the terms of our employment agreement with Mr. Erwin Weiss, during his employment, Mr. Weiss will participate in any applicable fiscal year annual incentive compensation plan, with his individual performance component being calculated at a minimum of 100% of the applicable fiscal year target incentive amount for Senior Vice |
• | Gary Weiss: With respect to fiscal |
The foregoing compensation arrangements with Messrs. Morry, Erwin and Gary Weiss were either approved by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the related partyperson transactions policy or in place prior to our adoption of the related partyperson transactions policy and were therefore not subject to the policy.
- 56 -
Transactions in Class B common shares. It is the company’s policy, as approved by the Board, to repurchase Class B common shares, in accordance with the terms set forth in the company’s articles of incorporation, whenever they are offered by a holder, unless such a repurchase is not otherwise permitted under agreements to which the company is a party. As such, in fiscal 2012, the company and the following executive officers were also participants in the following transactions:
• | Jeffrey Weiss: On May 2, 2011, Mr. Jeffrey Weiss sold to American Greetings 61,233 Class B common shares for $1,506,332. The company repurchased the shares at $24.60 per share, which, as required by our articles of incorporation, was the closing price on May 1, 2011, the last day for which sales were publicly reported before the offer to sell was received by the company. On July 5, 2011, Mr. Jeffrey Weiss sold to American Greetings 18,794 Class B common shares for $450,680. The company repurchased the shares at $23.98 per share, which, as required by our articles of incorporation, was the closing price on July 3, 2011, the last day for which sales were publicly reported before the offer to sell was received by the company. |
• | Morry Weiss: On May 2, 2011, Mr. Morry Weiss sold 96,803 Class B common shares to American Greetings for $2,381,354. The company repurchased the shares at $24.60 per share, which, as required by our articles of incorporation, was the closing price on May 1, 2011, the last day for which sales were publicly reported before the offer to sell was received by the company. On May 3, 2011, Mr. Morry Weiss sold 776 Class B common shares to American Greetings for $18,407. The company repurchased the shares at $23.72 per share, which as required by our articles of incorporation, was the closing price on May 2, 2011, the last day for which sales were publicly reported before the offer to sell was received by the company. |
• | Zev Weiss: On May 2, 2011, Mr. Zev Weiss sold 196,412 Class B common shares to American Greetings for $4,831,735. The company repurchased the shares at $24.60 per share, which, as required by our articles of incorporation, was the closing price on May 1, 2011, the last day for which sales were publicly reported before the offer to sell was received by the company. On May 3, 2011, Mr. Zev Weiss sold 2,997 Class B common shares to American Greetings for $71,089. The company repurchased the shares at $23.72 per share, which, as required by our articles of incorporation, was the closing price on May 2, 2011, the last day for which sales were publicly reported before the offer to sell was received by the company. |
The foregoing transactions were pre-approved under our related persons transaction policy.
World headquarters relocation. In May 2011, we announced that we will be relocating our world headquarters to a new location in the City of Westlake, Ohio, in a mixed-use development known as Crocker Park (the “Crocker Park Development”), which offers a vibrant urban setting, with retail stores and restaurants, offices, apartments and private residences. Although we have not yet purchased the land on which our world headquarters is expected to be located (the “Crocker Park Site”), we have been negotiating the purchase of the Crocker Park Site from, and have entered into a preliminary, non-binding term sheet with, Crocker Park, LLC, the owner of the Crocker Park Development. Morry Weiss, our Chairman, Zev Weiss, our Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey Weiss, our President and Chief Operating officer, and Gary Weiss, a non-executive officer of the company, together with members of their family (collectively, but excluding Erwin Weiss, the “Weiss Family”), indirectly own a minority stake in Crocker Park, LLC through their indirect ownership of approximately 37% of the membership interests in Crocker Park, LLC. The authority to conduct, manage and control the business of Crocker Park, LLC, including operating the Crocker Park Development and the decision whether to sell the Crocker Park Site, are reserved to the manager of Crocker Park, LLC, who is unrelated to the Weiss Family. In addition, Morry Weiss has guaranteed certain of Crocker Park, LLC’s obligations that it incurred in connection with developing other portions of the Crocker Park Development that are adjacent to the Crocker Park Site. Although we have not entered into a binding obligation to purchase the Crocker Park Site, in anticipation of making this purchase and beginning construction of our new world headquarters in the Crocker Park Development, on March 23, 2012, we executed an agreement with the City of Westlake and Crocker Park LLC (the “City Development Agreement”). The City Development Agreement provides a framework for the financing and construction of public infrastructure by the City of Westlake related to the development of the Crocker Park Site where our new world headquarters will be located. Specifically, the City Development Agreement provides
57
that if certain conditions are met, including our purchase of the Crocker Park Site, the City of Westlake will issue tax-increment financing bonds (“TIF Bonds”) in an amount not to exceed $54,000,000 and utilize the proceeds of such TIF Bonds to construct streets, sidewalks, driveways and parking facilities in the Crocker Park Development (collectively, the “Public Infrastructure”). The City of Westlake’s construction of the Public Infrastructure will facilitate both the development of our headquarters at the Crocker Park Site and the development by Crocker Park, LLC of additional retail stores, restaurants and apartments on parcels adjacent to the Crocker Park Site. Pursuant to the City Development Agreement, the company and Crocker Park, LLC have each committed that, in consideration of the issuance of the TIF Bonds by the City of Westlake, they will each make service payments in lieu of taxes, including minimum service payments, and those service payments will be used by the City of Westlake to pay debt service on the TIF Bonds.
None of the parties will have any obligations under the City Development Agreement until we have purchased land in the City of Westlake to build our new world headquarters. However, if we do build our world headquarters on the Crocker Park Site as is currently contemplated, through their indirect ownership interest in Crocker Park, LLC, Messrs. Morry, Zev, Jeffrey and Gary Weiss, together with their family members, may be deemed to have an interest in the transactions contemplated by the City Development Agreement because:
the construction of the world headquarters by us, and the infrastructure improvements to be made by the City of Westlake and financed through the TIF bonds, will benefit the entire Crocker Park Development; and
we may not be able to purchase the Crocker Park Site, or develop our world headquarters, on terms that are acceptable to us, without the City of Westlake’s agreement to construct the Public Infrastructure pursuant to the City Development Agreement.
In selecting a location in Northeastern Ohio, an independent committee of the Board considered a number of sites both within and outside the State of Ohio. All of these sites were evaluated side by side for their benefits, disadvantages and costs, utilizing independent professional real estate advisors. The real estate investment by members of the Weiss family did not affect the decision to select the Crocker Park Development, as the independent directors reached their conclusion after more than a year-long analysis of a variety of factors, including changes in the greeting-card industry, employee recruitment, local tax rates, the costs of a new or renovated facility, moving expenses, and the company’s desire for offices and an environment that better fits an evolving business with a significant creative culture. The independent members of the Board unanimously approved and authorized the company to enter into the City Development Agreement, and we will not enter into any binding agreement with Crocker Park, LLC to purchase the Crocker Park Site unless it is approved by our independent directors. Because the City Development Agreement was unanimously approved by our independent directors, including all members of the Audit Committee, after a review of the relevant facts and circumstances, including the involvement of related persons, the City Development Agreement was not approved separately by the Audit Committee under our related persons transaction policy.
58
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
This report provides information concerning the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.Board.
The Audit Committee reviews our financial reporting practices on behalf of the Board of Directors.Board. Management is responsible for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the year ended February 28, 200929, 2012 with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles; the reasonableness of significant judgments; and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed byunder the statementStatement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol.1.AU Section 380),and as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee also obtained a formal written statement from the independent registered public accounting firm that described all of American Greetings’ relationships with the independent registered public accounting firm that might bear on the auditor’s independence as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm any relationships that might influence its objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of non-audit services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young’sYoung LLP’s independence. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of American Greetings’ financial statements, and the independent registered public accounting firm has the responsibility for the auditing of those statements.
Based on the above-referenced review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 200929, 2012 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.
Audit Committee
William E. MacDonald, III, ChairmanChair
Scott S. Cowen
Jeffrey D. Dunn
Jerry Sue ThorntonMichael J. Merriman, Jr.
- 57 -
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The firm of Ernst & Young LLP and its predecessors has been our independent registered public accounting firm since our incorporation in 1944. In connection with the audit of the fiscal 20092012 financial statements, we entered into an engagement agreement with Ernst & Young LLP which sets forth the terms by which Ernst & Young LLP would perform audit services for us. That agreement is subject to alternative dispute resolution procedures and an exclusion of punitive damages. The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2010.2013. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Paid to Ernst & Young LLP
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal 20092012 and fiscal 2008,2011, including the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and for Ernst & Young LLP’sthe reviews of the interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC for fiscal 20092012 and fiscal 20082011, and statutory audits required internationally and registration statements were $1,925,400$1,949,700 and $1,902,100,$1,635,100, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees. The aggregateThere were no fees billed for audit-related fees, such as assurance and related services, provided by Ernst & Young LLP thatfor either fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011 and which were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and were not otherwise reported under “Audit Fees” above for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 were $494,700 and $111,100, respectively. Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for due diligence in connection with acquisitions, statutory audits and assurance and related services including fees billed for audits of employee benefit plans.above.
Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for fiscal 20092012 and fiscal 20082011 were $351,500$191,100 and $655,100,$380,200, respectively. These fees related primarily to tax compliance, tax consulting and international tax matters.
All Other Fees. There were no fees billed for other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for either fiscal 20092012 or fiscal 2008.2011.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. It is the Audit Committee’s policy that all audit and non-audit services to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm be preapproved by the Audit Committee (including the fees and terms of such services), subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations thereunder. In accordance with such policy, the Audit Committee preapproved 100% of the services described above under the captions Audit, Audit-Related Fees Tax Fees and All OtherTax Fees for fiscal 20092012 and fiscal 2008.2011.
- 58 -
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Security Ownership of Management
At the close of business on May 1, 2009,April 30, 2012, our directors, the named executive officers and the directors and officers as a group beneficially owned and had sole voting and dispositive power (except as otherwise indicated) of our common shares as set forth in the following table:
Name | Title of Class | Amount & Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class Outstanding | Deferred Compensation Plan Share Equivalents(5) | |||||
Scott S. Cowen | Class A Common | 36,300 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | 1,826 | ||||||
Jeffrey D. Dunn | Class A Common | 7,000 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | ||||||
Joseph S. Hardin, Jr. | Class A Common | 28,000 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | 12,874 | ¿ | 1,466 | ||||||
William E. MacDonald, III | Class A Common | 8,000 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | ||||||
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | Class A Common | 17,500 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | ||||||
Charles A. Ratner | Class A Common | 43,500 | (1) | ¿ | 6,540 | ||||
Class B Common | 16,219 | ¿ | — | ||||||
Jerry Sue Thornton | Class A Common | 43,500 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | 12,632 | ||||||
Morry Weiss | Class A Common | 191,911 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | 766,458 | (1)(2)(3) | 21.92% | — | |||||
Zev Weiss | Class A Common | 58,936 | (1)(3) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | 463,850 | (1)(3)(4) | 13.26% | 117,393 | |||||
Jeffrey Weiss | Class A Common | 28,494 | (1)(3) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | 340,558 | (1)(4)(6) | 9.74% | 83,411 | |||||
Stephen J. Smith | Class A Common | 79,500 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | ||||||
Michael L. Goulder | Class A Common | 184,625 | (1) | ¿ | — | ||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | ||||||
All Directors & Executive | Class A Common | 1,654,970 | (1)(3) | 4.61% | 6,450 | ||||
Officers as a group (21 including the above) | Class B Common | 1,599,959 | (1)(2)(4) | 45.75% | 216,728 |
Name | Title of Class | Amount & Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class Outstanding | Deferred Compensation Plan Share Equivalents(5) | ||||||||||
Scott S. Cowen | Class A Common | 67,700 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | 1,994 | (6) | ¿ | — | ||||||||||
Jeffrey D. Dunn | Class A Common | 45,900 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | |||||||||||
William E. MacDonald, III | Class A Common | 46,900 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | |||||||||||
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | Class A Common | 52,900 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | |||||||||||
Charles A. Ratner | Class A Common | 82,036 | (1)(6) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | 16,219 | ¿ | — | |||||||||||
Jerry Sue Thornton | Class A Common | 66,900 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | 13,797 | (6) | ¿ | |||||||||||
Morry Weiss | Class A Common | 19,310 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | 339,405 | (1)(2) | 11.43% | — | ||||||||||
Zev Weiss | Class A Common | — | ¿ | — | ||||||||||
Class B Common | 551,504 | (1)(4) | 16.49% | 47,740 | ||||||||||
Jeffrey Weiss | Class A Common | 4,258 | (3) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | 353,245 | (1)(4) | 11.18% | — | ||||||||||
Stephen J. Smith | Class A Common | 108,158 | (1) | ¿ | — | |||||||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | |||||||||||
John W. Beeder | Class A Common | 30,125 | (1) | ¿ | 38,888 | |||||||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | — | |||||||||||
Michael L. Goulder | Class A Common | 281,736 | (1) | ¿ | ||||||||||
Class B Common | — | ¿ | ||||||||||||
All Directors & Executive | Class A Common | 1,499,068 | (1)(3)(6) | 4.47% | 38,888 | |||||||||
Officers as a group | Class B Common | 1,276,163 | (1)(2)(4)(6) | 33.68% | 47,740 |
- 59 -¿ less than 1.0% of class outstanding
61
(1) | Includes the following shares for the following individuals who under Rule 13d-3 of the |
Scott S. Cowen | Class A Common | 66,900 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
Jeffrey D. Dunn | Class A Common | 45,900 | ||||
Class B Common | ||||||
| ||||||
— | ||||||
William E. MacDonald, III | Class A Common | 45,900 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
Michael J. Merriman, Jr. | Class A Common | 52,900 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
Charles A. Ratner | Class A Common | 66,900 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
Jerry Sue Thornton | Class A Common | 66,900 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
Morry Weiss | Class A Common | 19,310 | ||||
Class B Common | 126,022 | |||||
Zev Weiss | Class A Common | — | ||||
Class B Common | 502,431 | |||||
Jeffrey Weiss | Class A Common | — | ||||
Class B Common | 318,065 | |||||
Stephen J. Smith | Class A Common | 96,110 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
John W. Beeder | Class A Common | 30,125 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
Michael L. Goulder | Class A Common | 265,600 | ||||
Class B Common | — | |||||
All Directors & Executive | Class A Common | 1,313,488 | ||||
Officers as a group |
Class B Common |
| 946,518 |
(2) | Includes 26,737 Class B common shares that have been pledged as security for a loan from a financial institution. Excludes the following shares with respect to which Mr. Morry Weiss disclaims beneficial ownership: 78,800 Class B common shares beneficially owned by Mr. Weiss’s wife, Judith Weiss; 203,964 Class B common shares owned by the Irving I. Stone Foundation, of which Mr. Weiss is a trustee; and 200,000 Class B common shares owned by the Irving I. Stone Support Foundation, of which Mr. Weiss is a trustee. Includes 5,827 Class B common shares that are issuable under performance shares that have been credited to Mr. Morry Weiss but that have not vested, as well as 1,140 RSUs that have not vested, such shares being issuable upon Mr. Weiss’s retirement in accordance with the terms of the respective grant agreements. |
(3) | One of the investment alternatives in the American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan is a fund made up of our Class A common shares. As of |
62
shares that is allocated to a participant is proportionate to the participant’s investment in the fund relative to all participant investments in the fund. Accordingly, the amounts include the following shares which, under Rule 13d-3 of the |
- 60 -
|
(4) | The amounts exclude the following shares with respect to which each of Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss disclaims beneficial ownership: 203,964 Class B common shares owned by the Irving I. Stone Foundation, of which each of Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss is a trustee; 200,000 Class B common shares owned by the Irving I. Stone Support Foundation, of which each of Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss is a trustee; and 1,812,182 Class B common shares beneficially owned by the Irving I. Stone Limited Liability Company and the Irving I. Stone Oversight Trust. Each of Messrs. Zev and Jeffrey Weiss |
(5) | Represents share equivalents credited to the accounts of the named individual with respect to shares deferred under American Greetings deferred compensation programs. These individuals have neither voting power with respect to the shares allocated to the |
(6) |
Scott S. Cowen: 1,994 Class B common shares
- 61 -Charles A. Ratner: 7,136 Class A common shares
Jerry Sue Thornton: 13,797 Class B common shares
63
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
In addition to Morry Weiss, Zev Weiss and Jeffrey Weiss, each of whose business address is One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144 and whose share ownership is presented above, the following table presents certain information regarding other shareholders who are known to us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our voting securities as of the close of business on May 1, 2009:April 30, 2012:
Name and Address | Title of Class | Amount & Nature
| Percent
| ||||||
M.A.M. Investments Ltd., et al | Class A Common | 5,677,509 | (1) | ||||||
Orion House, 5 Upper St. Martin’s Lane | Class B Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
London WC2H 9EA, United Kingdom | |||||||||
Dimensional | Class A Common | 3,250,502 | (2) | ||||||
Palisades West, Building One, | Class B Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
6300 Bee Cave Road | |||||||||
Austin, Texas 78746 | |||||||||
| Class A Common | 2,803,990 | (3) | ||||||
| Class B Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
| |||||||||
LSV Asset Management | Class A Common | 1,990,600 | (4) | ||||||
| Class B Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
Chicago, Illinois 60606 | |||||||||
| Class A Common | 1,888,486 | (5) | ||||||
| Class B Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
The Irving I. Stone Limited Liability Company | Class A Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
Irving I. Stone Oversight Trust | Class B Common | 1,812,182 | |||||||
One American Road | |||||||||
Cleveland, Ohio 44144 | |||||||||
The Irving I. Stone Foundation | Class A Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
One American Road | Class B Common | 203,964 | (7) | 7.17% | |||||
Cleveland, Ohio 44144 | |||||||||
The Irving I. Stone Support Foundation | Class A Common | — | ¿ | ||||||
One American Road | Class B Common | 200,000 | (8) | 7.04% | |||||
Cleveland, Ohio 44144 |
¿ | less than 1.0% of class outstanding |
(1) | Information is as of December 31, 2011, and is based on an amended report on Schedule 13G filed with the |
(2) | Information is as of December 31, |
64
investment advisor |
- 62 -
(3) | Information is as of December |
(4) | Information is as of December 31, 2011, and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the |
(5) | Information is as of December 31, 2011, and is based on |
(6) | The shares are held by The Irving I. Stone Limited Liability Company and are voted at the direction of the Irving I. Stone Oversight Trust. Messrs. Zev, Jeffrey, Gary and Elie Weiss, who are brothers, are the sole trustees of the Irving I. Stone Oversight Trust, and each own, in their individual capacities, membership interests representing 24.5% of the non-voting equity interests in the Irving I. Stone Limited Liability Company. Each of Messrs. Zev, Jeffrey, Gary and Elie Weiss disclaim beneficial ownership of shares held by The Irving I. Stone Limited Liability Company. Mr. Gary Weiss is an employee and non-executive officer of American Greetings and Mr. Elie Weiss is not employed by American Greetings. |
(7) | Information is as of December 31, 2011, and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on April 15, 2010. The shares are held by the Irving I. Stone Foundation and are voted at the direction of its board of trustees, consisting of seven members. Messrs. Zev, Morry and Jeffrey Weiss are trustees of this foundation. |
(8) | Information is as of December 31, 2011, and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on April 15, 2010. The shares are held by the Irving I. Stone Support Foundation and are voted at the direction of its board of trustees, consisting of seven members. Messrs. Zev, Morry and Jeffrey Weiss are trustees of this foundation. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of American Greetings’ common shares file reports with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC indicating the number of shares of any class of American Greetings’ equity securities they owned when they became a director, executive officer or a greater-than-10% beneficial owner and, after that, any changes in their ownership of American Greetings’ equity securities. They must also provide us with copies of these reports. These reports are required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required during fiscal 2009,2012, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors, executive officers and greater-than-10% beneficial owners were complied with.
65
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20102013 ANNUAL MEETING
Any shareholder who wishes to offer a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card in compliance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must submit the proposal and any supporting statement by January 19, 201011, 2013 to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices. We will not be required to include in our proxy statement and form of proxy a shareholder proposal that is received after that date or which otherwise fails to meet the requirements for shareholder proposals established by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. In addition, if a shareholder intends to present a proposal at our 20102013 Annual Meeting, the shareholder must give written notice no less than 60 nor more than 90
- 63 -
days prior to the 2010 annual meeting;2013 Annual Meeting; however, the proposal will not be included in our proxy materials. Furthermore, the appointed proxies may exercise their discretionary voting authority for any shareholder proposal received after April 1, 2010,March 27, 2013 without any discussion of the proposal in our proxy statement.
MISCELLANEOUS
Other Business
The managementManagement knows of no other matters to be acted upon at the meeting, but if any such matters properly come before the meeting, it is intended that the persons voting the proxies will vote them according to their best judgment.
Important Notice Regarding Delivery of Shareholder Documents
The Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC permits a single set of annual reports and proxy statements to be sent to any household at which two or more shareholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each shareholder continues to receive a separate proxy and voting instruction card. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information shareholders receive and reduces mailing and printing costs. A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding. In accordance with an earlier notice previously sent to certain beneficial shareholders who share a single address, only one copy of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Annual Report will be sent to beneficial owners who share that address, unless any shareholder residing at that address gave us contrary instructions.
If any beneficial shareholder residing at such an address desires to receive a separate copy of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Annual Report, the shareholder should call National City Bank toll-freeWells Fargo Shareowner Services at1-800-622-6757, 1-800-468-9716, or write to American Greetings Corporation, Investor Relations, at One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144, with such request, and a copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report will be promptly delivered on behalf of us. In addition, if any such shareholder wishes to receive a separate Proxy Statement and Annual Report in the future, the shareholder should provide such instructions by calling National City Bank toll-freeWells Fargo Shareowner Services at1-800-622-6757 1-800-468-9716 or by writing to American Greetings Corporation, Investor Relations, at One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144.
Also, shareholders that share an address and that receive multiple copies of Annual Reports or Proxy Statements can request that only a single copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement be sent to that address in the future by providing us instructions, either by calling toll-free1-800-622-6757Wells Fargo Shareowner Services at 1-800-468-9716 or by writing to American Greetings Corporation, Investor Relations, at One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144.
By order of the Board of Directors,
CATHERINE M. KILBANE
Secretary
66
PLEASE EXECUTE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED
PROXY AND VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD PROMPTLY
OR
VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR VIA THE INTERNET
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS.
- 64 -
EXHIBIT A
AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION
2007 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
(AS AMENDED APRIL 17, 2009)
ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS
In this Plan, except where the context otherwise indicates, the following definitions apply.
A-1
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of Section 1.5(iii) and (iv) above, a “Change in Control” shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of this Plan (i) solely because (A) the Corporation; (B) a Subsidiary; (C) any Corporation–sponsored employee stock ownership plan or other employee benefit plan of the Corporation; or (D) any family member of Jacob Sapirstein (including lineal descendants, spouses of such descendants, the lineal descendants of any such spouse, the spouses of any such spouses’ lineal descendants and trust (including voting trusts)) either files or becomes obligated to file a report or proxy statement under or in response to Schedule 13D, Schedule TO, Form 8-K or Schedule 14A (or any successor schedule, form or report or item therein) under the Exchange Act, disclosing beneficial ownership by it of shares, whether in excess of 20% of the Voting Power or otherwise, or because the Corporation reports that a Change in Control of the Corporation has or may have occurred or will or may occur in the future by reason of such beneficial ownership or (ii) solely because of a Change in Control of any Subsidiary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if and to the extent that any provision of this Plan or an Award would cause a payment of deferred compensation that is subject to Section 409A(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code to be made upon the occurrence of a “Change in Control,” then such payment shall not be made unless such “Change in Control” satisfies the requirements of Section 409A(2)(A)(v) of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations and rulings thereunder.
A-2
A-3
A-4
ARTICLE 2
PURPOSE
The Plan is intended to promote the success and enhance the value of the Corporation by linking the personal interests of Directors, officers and other key employees and consultants to those of the Corporation’s shareholders and by providing flexibility to the Corporation in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of Directors, officers and other key employees and consultants upon whose judgment, interest and special effort the successful conduct of the Corporation’s operations is largely dependent.
A-5
ARTICLE 3
PLAN MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
The Plan will be managed by the Committee. Administrative functions may include, without limitation, documenting and communicating Awards made hereunder, maintaining records concerning such Awards, and satisfying (or assisting Eligible Persons in satisfying) any applicable reporting, disclosure, tax filing or withholding, or other legal requirements concerning Awards. Each member of the Committee is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act upon any report or other information furnished to that member by any officer or other employee of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm or other certified public accountants, or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained to assist in the administration of the Plan. In addition to any other powers granted to the Committee, it will have the following management powers, subject to the express provisions of the Plan:
A-6
Any determinations or actions made or taken by the Committee pursuant to this Article will be binding and final.
ARTICLE 4
ELIGIBILITY
Eligible Persons may be granted one or more Awards; provided, however, that Incentive Stock Options will not be granted to Directors.
ARTICLE 5
SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
|
A-7
|
ARTICLE 6
OPTIONS
|
A-8
|
ARTICLE 7
SHARE AWARDS, PERFORMANCE UNITS AND DIRECTORS’ AWARDS
|
A-9
|
A-10
ARTICLE 8
APPRECIATION RIGHTS
A-11
An Appreciation Right granted under clause (i) or (ii) of the preceding sentence is a Related Right. A Related Right may, in the Committee’s discretion, apply to all or a portion of the Options subject to the Related Award.
ARTICLE 9
PERFORMANCE BONUSES
The Committee may grant Performance Bonuses under the Plan in the form of cash or Shares to Eligible Persons that the Committee may from time to time select, in the amounts and pursuant to the terms and conditions that the Committee may determine, subject to the provisions below:
A-12
ARTICLE 10
QUALIFIED PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION
A-13
ARTICLE 11
TRANSFERABILITY
ARTICLE 12
EXERCISE; PAYMENT OF WITHHOLDING TAXES
An Award that is exercisable by the Grantee may, subject to the provisions of the Agreement under which it was granted, be exercised in whole or in part by the delivery to the Corporation of written notice of the exercise, in such form as the Committee may prescribe. The exercise, however, will not be effective until the Corporation has received the election notice and will be subject to receipt by the Corporation of payment of any applicable Option Price or other amount due in connection with such exercise, calculation by the Corporation of the applicable withholding taxes, and receipt by the Corporation of payment for any applicable withholding taxes.
A-14
ARTICLE 13
DEFERRAL OF AWARDS OR COMPENSATION
ARTICLE 14
CAPITAL ADJUSTMENTS
The number and class of Shares subject to each outstanding Share Award, the Option Price, the base price for any Appreciation Right or other Award using such a price, the aggregate number and class of Shares for which grants of Share Awards thereafter may be made or in which Awards may be paid, and the limits provided for in Article 5 of this Plan, will be subject to such adjustment, if any, as the Committee in its sole discretion deems appropriate to reflect any corporate transaction or event, including, without limitation, dividends, Share splits, spin-offs, split-ups, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations or reorganizations of or by the Corporation.
ARTICLE 15
CONSEQUENCES OF A CHANGE IN CONTROL
OR POTENTIAL CHANGE IN CONTROL
|
A-15
|
ARTICLE 16
TERMINATION OR AMENDMENT
ARTICLE 17
TERM OF THE PLAN
Unless sooner terminated by the Board or the Committee pursuant to Article 16 of this Plan, the Plan will terminate ten years after the date on which the Plan was first approved by the shareholders of the Corporation. The termination will not affect the validity of any Awards outstanding on the date of termination. Awards may be
A-16
granted or awarded prior to shareholder approval of this Plan, but any Award requiring such shareholder approval will be subject to approval of the Plan by the shareholders. No Award granted subject to such shareholder approval, and any dividends payable thereon, are subject to forfeiture if such shareholder approval is not obtained.
ARTICLE 18
INDEMNIFICATION OF COMMITTEE
In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as directors or as members of the Committee, the members of the Committee will be indemnified by the Corporation against the reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan or any Awards granted hereunder, and against all amounts reasonably paid by them in settlement thereof or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, if such members acted in good faith and in a manner which they believed to be in, and not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation.
ARTICLE 19
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
To the extent the Committee determines that any Award granted under the Plan is subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the Agreement evidencing such Award will incorporate the terms and conditions required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. To the extent applicable, the Plan and Agreement will be interpreted in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance issued thereunder, including without limitation any such regulations or other guidance that may be issued after the Effective Date. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, in the event that following the Effective Date the Committee determines that any Award may be subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the Committee may adopt such amendments to the Plan and/or the applicable Agreement or adopt policies and procedures or take any other action or actions, including an action or amendment with retroactive effect, that the Committee determines is necessary or appropriate to (i) exempt the Award from the application of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
ARTICLE 20
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
A-17
|
A-18
American Greetings Corporation
One American Road
Cleveland, Ohio 44144
| ONEAMERICANROAD CLEVELAND,OH44144 |
| ||||
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 14, 2012 if you are a registered holder or by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 12, 2012 if you are a participant in the American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Have your proxy and voting instruction card VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
| ||||||
| ||||||
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 14, 2012 if you are a registered holder or by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on June 12, 2012 if you are a participant in the American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Have your proxy and voting instruction card VOTE BY MAIL
| ||||||
| ||||||
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! Besurethatthesharesarerepresented.Whetherornot you plantoattendtheAnnualMeeting,pleasevotethe sharesbymail,bytelephoneorovertheInternet. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
| ||||||||
|
|
|
Telephone and Internet access is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. In order to be counted in the final tabulation, your telephone or Internet vote must be received by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time on June 23, 2009 if you are a participant in the American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, or by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time on June 26, 2009 if you are a registered holder.
|
|
| ||
|
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Jeffrey Weiss, Morry Weiss and Zev Weiss and each of them, his or her true and lawful agents and proxies with full power of substitution in each, to vote, as indicated on the reverse side of this card, all the American Greetings common shares held by the signing shareholder on the record date, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of American Greetings Corporation to be held at its World Headquarters located at One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio, at 2:30 p.m., Cleveland time, on Friday, June 26, 2009, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof and, in their discretion, on all other business properly brought before the meeting.— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
As described more fully in the proxy statement and on the reverse side, this card also provides voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, as Trustee under The American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”). The signing Savings Plan participant directs the Trustee to vote, as indicated on the reverse side of this card, all the American Greetings common shares credited to the account of the signing Savings Plan participant as of the record date, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and in accordance with the Savings Plan, on all other business properly brought before the meeting.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
| ||||
| ||||
|
| |||
|
NOTE TO PARTICIPANTS IN THE AMERICAN GREETINGS RETIREMENT PROFIT SHARINGTHIS PROXY AND SAVINGS PLAN (THE “SAVINGS PLAN”). As a participant in the Savings Plan, you have the right to direct Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, as Trustee for the Savings Plan, to vote the shares allocated to your Savings Plan account. To direct the Trustee by mail to vote the shares allocated to your Savings Plan account, please mark the voting instruction card below and sign and date it on the reverse side. A postage-paid envelope for mailing has been included with your materials. To direct the Trustee by telephone or over the Internet to vote the shares allocated to your Savings Plan account, please follow the instructions on the reverse side.
As described in the proxy statement, if you do not give specific voting directions on the voting instruction card, do not return the voting instruction card or do not vote by phone or over the Internet, the Trustee will vote your Savings Plan shares as directed by American Greetings Corporation.
|
|
AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION | For All | Withhold All | For All Except | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | ||||||||||||||||||
1. | ElectionofClassIIDirectorsfor a three-year term expiring on the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||||||
Nominees: 01) Charles A. Ratner 02) Jerry Sue Thornton 03) Jeffrey Weiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In their discretion, the proxies named herein are also authorized to take any action upon any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any reconvened meeting following an adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Address change? Mark box, sign and indicate changes on reverse side. | ¨ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ¨ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I plan to attend the Annual Meeting. | Yes | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on the proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy. |
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
M47312-P25175
AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders June 15, 2012 2:30 PM This proxy and these voting instructions are solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Jeffrey Weiss, Morry Weiss and Zev Weiss, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the common shares of AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 2:30 PM, Eastern Daylight Saving Time on June 15, 2012, at the American Greetings Corporation World Headquarters, One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44144, and any adjournment or postponement thereof and, in their discretion, on all other business properly brought before the meeting. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. As described more fully in the proxy statement, this card also provides voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, as Trustee under The American Greetings Retirement Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”), to vote the shares allocated to his or her account. By signing the reverse side of this card, the signing Savings Plan participant directs the Trustee to vote as indicated on the reverse side of this card all the American Greetings common shares credited to the account of the signing Savings Plan participant as of the record date at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and in accordance with the Savings Plan on all other business properly brought before the meeting. If you do not give specific voting directions on the voting instruction card, do not return the voting instruction card, or do not vote by phone or over the Internet, the Trustee will vote the shares in the Savings Plan as directed by American Greetings Corporation. | ||||||||
Address Changes/Comments: | ||||||||
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side |